Literature DB >> 28692568

Superior Segment Facet Joint Violation During Instrumented Lumbar Fusion is Associated With Higher Reoperation Rates and Diminished Improvement in Quality of Life.

Jay M Levin1,2,3,4, Vincent J Alentado5, Andrew T Healy1, Michael P Steinmetz1, Edward C Benzel1,3, Thomas E Mroz1,3,4.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of superior segment facet joint violation (FJV) during lumbar fusion on reoperation rates and quality of life (QOL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although lumbar fusion is an efficacious and durable treatment for numerous spinal pathologies, adjacent segment degeneration remains a serious complication. FJV has been suggested to alter load-bearing capability and potentially contribute to adjacent segment degeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent instrumented lumbar fusion surgery between 2009 and 2013 with postoperative computed tomography imaging were included. Patients were placed in the FJV group if either of the superior segment facet joints were compromised by the pedicle screw or rod. Patients with preserved facet joints were placed in the control group. Demographic, perioperative, QOL, and reoperation data were collected. QOL scores including the Pain Disability Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and EuroQOL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) were acquired.
RESULTS: Of 240 patients included, 112 patients were found to have FJV and the remaining 128 patients were placed in the control group. One year following lumbar fusion, QOL outcomes and reoperation rates were similar between the FJV and control groups. At 2-year follow-up, patients in the FJV group were less likely to make a significant improvement in EQ-5D (P=0.041). Also, the reoperation rate in the FJV group was significantly higher than in the control group at 2 years (15.2% vs. 6.3%, respectively; P=0.024) and 3 years (19.6% vs. 9.4%, P=0.023). Multivariable logistic regression showed FJV to be an independent predictor of both (1) failing to make a significant improvement in EQ-5D (P=0.046) and (2) undergoing reoperation at both 2 and 3 years postoperatively (P=0.024 and 0.020, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: FJV was independently associated with a higher reoperation rate and diminished improvement in QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28692568     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  12 in total

1.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shutao Gao; Zhengtao Lv; Huang Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adult spine deformity.

Authors:  Dawn Bowden; Annalisa Michielli; Michelle Merrill; Steven Will
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Facet Violation With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Impact of 3D Navigation and Facet Orientation.

Authors:  Ting Cong; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Christopher M Mikhail; Avani S Vaishnav; James Dowdell; Joseph Barbera; Hiroshi Kumagai; Jonathan Markowitz; Evan Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-03

5.  Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery.

Authors:  Jia-Nan Zhang; Yong Fan; Xin He; Tuan-Jiang Liu; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Accuracy and safety of robot-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw placement: a comparison of robot-assisted technique with fluoroscopy-assisted approach.

Authors:  Yue Li; Long Chen; Yuzeng Liu; Hongtao Ding; Hongyi Lu; Aixing Pan; Xinuo Zhang; Yong Hai; Li Guan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Lai Zhang; Hua-Qing Zhang; Jian-Xiang Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  Rate and Risk Factors of Superior Facet Joint Violation during Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement: A Comparison of Robot-Assisted Approach with a Conventional Technique.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Le; Zhan Shi; Qi-Long Wang; Yun-Feng Xu; Jing-Wei Zhao; Wei Tian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Comparison of Superior-Level Facet Joint Violations Between Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Yun-Feng Xu; Wei Tian; Xiao-Feng Le; Bo Liu; Ya-Jun Liu; Da He; Yu-Qin Sun; Qiang Yuan; Zhao Lang; Xiao-Guang Han
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis With Pedicle Screws at Upper Instrumented Vertebrae in Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; Steven D Glassman; Daniel Sucato; M Timothy Hresko; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.