| Literature DB >> 28690129 |
Lanfang Liu1, Xin Yan2, Jin Liu1, Mingrui Xia1, Chunming Lu1, Karen Emmorey3, Mingyuan Chu4, Guosheng Ding5.
Abstract
Signed languages are natural human languages using the visual-motor modality. Previous neuroimaging studies based on univariate activation analysis show that a widely overlapped cortical network is recruited regardless whether the sign language is comprehended (for signers) or not (for non-signers). Here we move beyond previous studies by examining whether the functional connectivity profiles and the underlying organizational structure of the overlapped neural network may differ between signers and non-signers when watching sign language. Using graph theoretical analysis (GTA) and fMRI, we compared the large-scale functional network organization in hearing signers with non-signers during the observation of sentences in Chinese Sign Language. We found that signed sentences elicited highly similar cortical activations in the two groups of participants, with slightly larger responses within the left frontal and left temporal gyrus in signers than in non-signers. Crucially, further GTA revealed substantial group differences in the topologies of this activation network. Globally, the network engaged by signers showed higher local efficiency (t(24)=2.379, p=0.026), small-worldness (t(24)=2.604, p=0.016) and modularity (t(24)=3.513, p=0.002), and exhibited different modular structures, compared to the network engaged by non-signers. Locally, the left ventral pars opercularis served as a network hub in the signer group but not in the non-signer group. These findings suggest that, despite overlap in cortical activation, the neural substrates underlying sign language comprehension are distinguishable at the network level from those for the processing of gestural action.Entities:
Keywords: Graph theoretical analysis; Hub; Left ventral pars opercularis; Sign language
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28690129 PMCID: PMC7061525 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.06.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252