Literature DB >> 28689719

The thermal environment of the nest affects body and cell size in the solitary red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.).

Justyna Kierat1, Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi2, Marcin Czarnoleski3, Michał Woyciechowski4.   

Abstract

Many ectotherms grow larger at lower temperatures than at higher temperatures. This pattern, known as the temperature-size rule, is often accompanied by plastic changes in cell size, which can mechanistically explain the thermal dependence of body size. However, the theory predicts that thermal plasticity in cell size has adaptive value for ectotherms because there are different optimal cell-membrane-to-cell-volume ratios at different temperatures. At high temperatures, the demand for oxygen is high; therefore, a large membrane surface of small cells is beneficial because it allows high rates of oxygen transport into the cell. The metabolic costs of maintaining membranes become more important at low temperatures than at high temperatures, which favours large cells. In a field experiment, we manipulated the thermal conditions inside nests of the red mason bee, a solitary bee that does not regulate the temperature in its nests and whose larvae develop under ambient conditions. We assessed the effect of temperature on body mass and ommatidia size (our proxy of cell size). The body and cell sizes decreased in response to a higher mean temperature and greater temperature fluctuations. This finding is in accordance with predictions of the temperature-size rule and optimal cell size theory and suggests that both the mean temperature and the magnitude of temperature fluctuations are important for determining body and cell sizes. Additionally, we observed that males of the red mason bee tend to have larger ommatidia in relation to their body mass than females, which might play an important role during mating flight.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell size; Developmental conditions; Osmia bicornis; Temperature-size rule; Theory of optimal cell size

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28689719     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Therm Biol        ISSN: 0306-4565            Impact factor:   2.902


  5 in total

1.  Forewing structure of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis developing on heavy metal pollution gradient.

Authors:  Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Dawid Moroń; Anna Nawrocka; Adam Tofilski; Michał Woyciechowski
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Not all cells are equal: effects of temperature and sex on the size of different cell types in the Madagascar ground gecko Paroedura picta.

Authors:  Marcin Czarnoleski; Anna Maria Labecka; Zuzana Starostová; Anna Sikorska; Elżbieta Bonda-Ostaszewska; Katarzyna Woch; Lukáš Kubička; Lukáš Kratochvíl; Jan Kozlowski
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.422

3.  Genome Size Covaries More Positively with Propagule Size than Adult Size: New Insights into an Old Problem.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Effects of thermal and oxygen conditions during development on cell size in the common rough woodlice Porcellio scaber.

Authors:  Andrzej Antoł; Anna Maria Labecka; Terézia Horváthová; Anna Sikorska; Natalia Szabla; Ulf Bauchinger; Jan Kozłowski; Marcin Czarnoleski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Effects of developmental plasticity on heat tolerance may be mediated by changes in cell size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadja Verspagen; Félix P Leiva; Irene M Janssen; Wilco C E P Verberk
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.