Literature DB >> 28689470

Analysis and comparison of wrist splint designs using the finite element method: Multi-material three-dimensional printing compared to typical existing practice with thermoplastics.

Aitor Cazon1, Sarah Kelly2, Abby M Paterson2, Richard J Bibb2, R Ian Campbell2.   

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disease affecting the joints. Treatment can include immobilisation of the affected joint with a custom-fitting splint, which is typically fabricated by hand from low temperature thermoplastic, but the approach poses several limitations. This study focused on the evaluation, by finite element analysis, of additive manufacturing techniques for wrist splints in order to improve upon the typical splinting approach. An additive manufactured/3D printed splint, specifically designed to be built using Objet Connex multi-material technology and a virtual model of a typical splint, digitised from a real patient-specific splint using three-dimensional scanning, were modelled in computer-aided design software. Forty finite element analysis simulations were performed in flexion-extension and radial-ulnar wrist movements to compare the displacements and the stresses. Simulations have shown that for low severity loads, the additive manufacturing splint has 25%, 76% and 27% less displacement in the main loading direction than the typical splint in flexion, extension and radial, respectively, while ulnar values were 75% lower in the traditional splint. For higher severity loads, the flexion and extension movements resulted in deflections that were 24% and 60%, respectively, lower in the additive manufacturing splint. However, for higher severity loading, the radial defection values were very similar in both splints and ulnar movement deflection was higher in the additive manufacturing splint. A physical prototype of the additive manufacturing splint was also manufactured and was tested under normal conditions to validate the finite element analysis data. Results from static tests showed maximum displacements of 3.46, 0.97, 3.53 and 2.51 mm flexion, extension, radial and ulnar directions, respectively. According to these results, the present research argues that from a technical point of view, the additive manufacturing splint design stands at the same or even better level of performance in displacements and stress values in comparison to the typical low temperature thermoplastic approach and is therefore a feasible approach to splint design and manufacture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthritis; Von Mises stress; additive manufacturing; finite element analysis; wrist splint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689470     DOI: 10.1177/0954411917718221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  5 in total

1.  In-hospital production of 3D-printed casts for non-displaced wrist and hand fractures.

Authors:  Shai Factor; Franck Atlan; Tamir Pritsch; Netta Rumack; Eran Golden; Solomon Dadia
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Rapid customization system for 3D-printed splint using programmable modeling technique - a practical approach.

Authors:  Jianyou Li; Hiroya Tanaka
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2018-05-25

3.  Overview of In-Hospital 3D Printing and Practical Applications in Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Marco Keller; Alissa Guebeli; Florian Thieringer; Philipp Honigmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Leonie Waldburger; Romain Schaller; Christina Furthmüller; Lorena Schrepfer; Dirk J Schaefer; Alexandre Kaempfen
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-12-02

5.  Evaluation and Comparison of Traditional Plaster and Fiberglass Casts with 3D-Printed PLA and PLA-CaCO3 Composite Splints for Bone-Fracture Management.

Authors:  Ádám Tibor Schlégl; Roland Told; Kinga Kardos; András Szőke; Zoltan Ujfalusi; Péter Maróti
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.