Literature DB >> 28688934

Humeral bone resorption after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty using an uncemented stem.

Kazuya Inoue1, Naoki Suenaga2, Naomi Oizumi2, Hiroshi Yamaguchi3, Naoki Miyoshi4, Noboru Taniguchi5, Mitsuru Munemoto6, Takuya Egawa6, Yasuhito Tanaka6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone resorption around the femoral stem after total hip arthroplasty is a well-known phenomenon. However, only a few studies have evaluated bone resorption after shoulder arthroplasty. This study investigated the prevalence of humeral bone resorption after different shoulder arthroplasty procedures.
METHODS: The study included 147 shoulders that underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or humeral head replacement (HHR) with an uncemented humeral stem from November 2008 to May 2015 and were monitored for more than 1 year. The prevalence of humeral bone resorption and risk factors were investigated.
RESULTS: The most advanced grade of bone resorption, grade 0, occurred in 21 shoulders (14.3%). Grade 1 bone resorption occurred in 10 (6.8%), grade 2 in 28 (19.0%), grade 3 in 61 (41.5%), and grade 4 in 27 (18.4%). High occurrence of bone absorption was observed in zones 1, 2, and 7. Grade 4 bone resorption did not occur in zones 3 and 5. HHR, on-growth type stem coating, and occupation ratio were significant independent risk factors for grade ≥3 bone resorption, whereas female sex and HHR were significant independent risk factors for grade 4.
CONCLUSION: Bone resorption was observed in 126 shoulders (85.7%), and full-thickness cortical bone resorption occurred in 27 shoulders (18.4%). Bone resorption was frequently observed at the greater tuberosity, lateral diaphysis, and calcar region (zones 1, 2, and 7). Significant risk factors included female sex, HHR with rotator cuff reconstruction, on-growth type stem coating, and high occupation ratio of the implant.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humeral bone; bone resorption; risk factor; shoulder arthroplasty; stress shielding; uncemented humeral stem

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Jong Hun Park; Hashem Bukhary; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Does proximal porous coating in short-stem humeral arthroplasty reduce stress shielding?

Authors:  Martin T Tan; John W Read; Desmond J Bokor
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 3.  Bioactive Glass and Silicate-Based Ceramic Coatings on Metallic Implants: Open Challenge or Outdated Topic?

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Hamada Elsayed; Lisa Biasetto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  The Application of Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) to Evaluate Strain Predictions Generated by Finite Element Models of the Osteoarthritic Humeral Head.

Authors:  Jonathan Kusins; Nikolas Knowles; Melanie Columbus; Sara Oliviero; Enrico Dall'Ara; George S Athwal; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Humeral bone resorption after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using uncemented stem.

Authors:  Kazuya Inoue; Naoki Suenaga; Naomi Oizumi; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Naoki Miyoshi; Noboru Taniguchi; Shuzo Morita; Mitsuru Munemoto; Shimpei Kurata; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-14

6.  Proximal humeral bony adaptations with a short uncemented stem for shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Peduzzi; Thomas Goetzmann; Frank Wein; Olivier Roche; François Sirveaux; Daniel Mole; Adrien Jacquot
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.