Gregory M Parker1, Virginia T LeBaron2, Monica Krishnan3, Ron Y Shiloh4, Alexander Spektor3, Lauren Hertan5, Tracy A Balboni6. 1. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. University of Virginia, School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: tbalboni@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiation oncologists frequently provide care for patients with advanced cancer who are in their last months or weeks of life. This study examined the previously not well-characterized types and frequencies of palliative care issues encountered in consultations for palliative radiation therapy (PRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective, survey-based study assessed consecutive consults for PRT from May 19, 2014, to September 26, 2014 at 3 Boston-area community and academic, hospital-based centers. Participating physicians and nurse practitioners completed a survey to identify and rank the relevance (5-point Likert scale, not at all to extremely) of palliative care issues. Eight domains adapted from national palliative care guidelines (physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, cultural considerations, spiritual needs, care coordination, advance care planning, goals of care, and ethical and legal issues) were evaluated. A total of 162 consecutive consultations were surveyed with 140 responses received (86% response rate). RESULTS: Most (82%) consults had 2 or more palliative care domains ranked as highly (very or extremely) relevant to care. The domains of physical symptoms (91%), care coordination (70%), goals of care (59%), and psychosocial issues (52%) were the most commonly reported domains as highly relevant to care. Forty-six percent of consults involved a high palliative care burden (4 or more palliative care domains identified as highly relevant to care). Predictors of high palliative care burden in multivariable analysis were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >2 (odds ratio, 3.57; P = .047), a plan for no further anticancer therapy after PRT (odds ratio, 3.46; P = .03), and a recommendation against PRT (odds ratio, 4.80; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology clinicians encounter multiple palliative care issues when consulting on patients for PRT. Clinicians identified physical symptoms, care coordination, and goals of care as the most relevant palliative care domains. These findings can help guide palliative care development within radiation oncology, including education and structures of care delivery.
PURPOSE: Radiation oncologists frequently provide care for patients with advanced cancer who are in their last months or weeks of life. This study examined the previously not well-characterized types and frequencies of palliative care issues encountered in consultations for palliative radiation therapy (PRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective, survey-based study assessed consecutive consults for PRT from May 19, 2014, to September 26, 2014 at 3 Boston-area community and academic, hospital-based centers. Participating physicians and nurse practitioners completed a survey to identify and rank the relevance (5-point Likert scale, not at all to extremely) of palliative care issues. Eight domains adapted from national palliative care guidelines (physical symptoms, psychosocial issues, cultural considerations, spiritual needs, care coordination, advance care planning, goals of care, and ethical and legal issues) were evaluated. A total of 162 consecutive consultations were surveyed with 140 responses received (86% response rate). RESULTS: Most (82%) consults had 2 or more palliative care domains ranked as highly (very or extremely) relevant to care. The domains of physical symptoms (91%), care coordination (70%), goals of care (59%), and psychosocial issues (52%) were the most commonly reported domains as highly relevant to care. Forty-six percent of consults involved a high palliative care burden (4 or more palliative care domains identified as highly relevant to care). Predictors of high palliative care burden in multivariable analysis were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >2 (odds ratio, 3.57; P = .047), a plan for no further anticancer therapy after PRT (odds ratio, 3.46; P = .03), and a recommendation against PRT (odds ratio, 4.80; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncology clinicians encounter multiple palliative care issues when consulting on patients for PRT. Clinicians identified physical symptoms, care coordination, and goals of care as the most relevant palliative care domains. These findings can help guide palliative care development within radiation oncology, including education and structures of care delivery.
Authors: Daniel Hong; Lauren C Das; Ellen Daily; Stacie K Levine; Olwen M Hahn; Stanley L Liauw; Daniel W Golden; Christina H Son Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.603