Literature DB >> 28688650

Pilot evaluation of the Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics test.

Edward S Shipper1, Laura M Mazer2, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell2, Dana T Lin2, James N Lau2, Marc L Melcher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High attrition rates hint at deficiencies in the resident selection process. The evaluation of personal characteristics representative of success is difficult. Here, we evaluate a novel tool for assessing personal characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate feasibility, we used an anonymous voluntary survey questionnaire offered to study participants before and after contact with the CASPer test. To evaluate the CASPer test as a predictor of success, we compared CASPer test assessments of personal characteristics versus traditional faculty assessment of personal characteristics with applicant rank list position.
RESULTS: All applicants (n = 77) attending an in-person interview for general surgery residency, and all faculty interviewers (n = 34) who reviewed these applications were invited to participate. Among applicants, 84.4% of respondents (65 of 77) reported that a requirement to complete the CASPer test would have no bearing or would make them more likely to apply to the program (mean = 3.30, standard deviation = 0.96). Among the faculty, 62.5% respondents (10 of 16) reported that the same condition would have no bearing or would make applicants more likely to apply to the program (mean = 3.19, standard deviation = 1.33). The Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients for the relationships between traditional faculty assessment of personal characteristics and applicant rank list position, and novel CASPer assessment of personal characteristics and applicant rank list position, were -0.45 (P = 0.033) and -0.41 (P = 0.055), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The CASPer test may be feasibly implemented as component of the resident selection process, with the potential to predict applicant rank list position and improve the general surgery resident selection process.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Personal characteristics; Resident assessment; Resident attrition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688650     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Reimagining Residency Selection: Part 3-A Practical Guide to Ranking Applicants in the Post-COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Kevan Sternberg; Mary R C Haas; Shuhan He; Lalena M Yarris; Teresa M Chan; Nicole M Deiorio
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 2.  Evaluating the Whole Applicant: Use of Situational Judgment Testing and Personality Testing to Address Disparities in Resident Selection.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.862

3.  The influence of income on medical school admissions in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tyler Pitre; Alexander Thomas; Kyle Evans; Aaron Jones; Margo Mountjoy; Andrew P Costa
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  COVID-19: A Driver for Disruptive Innovation of the Emergency Medicine Residency Application Process.

Authors:  Alexis Pelletier-Bui; Doug Franzen; Liza Smith; Laura Hopson; Lucienne Lutfy-Clayton; Kendra Parekh; Mark Olaf; Tom Morrissey; David Gordon; Erin McDonough; Benjamin H Schnapp; Mary Ann Edens; Michael Kiemeney
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.