Anastasija Wang-Chan1, Christian Gingert2, Eliane Angst3, Franc Heinrich Hetzer4. 1. Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Hospital Linth, Uznach, Switzerland. Electronic address: anastasija.wang-chan@spital-linth.ch. 2. Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; Faculty of Health, Department of Medicine, University of Witten/Herdecke, Herdecke, Germany. 3. Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland; Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Hospital Linth, Uznach, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical wound classification (SWC) is used for risk stratification of surgical site infection (SSI) and serves as the basis for measuring quality of care. The objective was to examine the accuracy and reliability of SWC. This study was purposed to evaluate the discrepancies in SWC as assessed by three groups: surgeons, an infection control nurse, and histopathologic evaluation. The secondary aim was to compare the risk-stratified SSI rates using the different SWC methods for 30 d postoperatively. METHODS: An analysis was performed of the appendectomies from January 2013 to June 2014 in the Cantonal Hospital of Schaffhausen. SWC was assigned by the operating surgeon at the end of the procedure and retrospectively reviewed by a Swissnoso-trained infection control nurse after reading the operative and pathology report. The level of agreement among the three different SWC assessment groups was determined using kappa statistic. SSI rates were analyzed using a chi-square test. RESULTS: In 246 evaluated cases, the kappa scores for interrater reliability among the SWC assessments across the three groups ranged from 0.05 to 0.2 signifying slight agreement between the groups. SSIs were more frequently associated with trained infection control nurse-assigned SWC than with surgeons based SWC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a considerable discordance in the SWC assessments performed by the three groups. Unfortunately, the currently practiced SWC system suffers from ambiguity in definition and/or implementation of these definitions is not clearly stated. This lack of reliability is problematic and may lead to inappropriate comparisons within and between hospitals and surgeons.
BACKGROUND: Surgical wound classification (SWC) is used for risk stratification of surgical site infection (SSI) and serves as the basis for measuring quality of care. The objective was to examine the accuracy and reliability of SWC. This study was purposed to evaluate the discrepancies in SWC as assessed by three groups: surgeons, an infection control nurse, and histopathologic evaluation. The secondary aim was to compare the risk-stratified SSI rates using the different SWC methods for 30 d postoperatively. METHODS: An analysis was performed of the appendectomies from January 2013 to June 2014 in the Cantonal Hospital of Schaffhausen. SWC was assigned by the operating surgeon at the end of the procedure and retrospectively reviewed by a Swissnoso-trained infection control nurse after reading the operative and pathology report. The level of agreement among the three different SWC assessment groups was determined using kappa statistic. SSI rates were analyzed using a chi-square test. RESULTS: In 246 evaluated cases, the kappa scores for interrater reliability among the SWC assessments across the three groups ranged from 0.05 to 0.2 signifying slight agreement between the groups. SSIs were more frequently associated with trained infection control nurse-assigned SWC than with surgeons based SWC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a considerable discordance in the SWC assessments performed by the three groups. Unfortunately, the currently practiced SWC system suffers from ambiguity in definition and/or implementation of these definitions is not clearly stated. This lack of reliability is problematic and may lead to inappropriate comparisons within and between hospitals and surgeons.
Authors: Joseph W Gorvetzian; Katharine E Epler; Samuel Schrader; Joshua M Romero; Ronald Schrader; Alissa Greenbaum; Rohini McKee Journal: Heliyon Date: 2018-08-08