Literature DB >> 28688632

ECMO Support in Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary Analysis of Hospital Charges in the United States.

J W Awori Hayanga1, Norihisa Shigemura2, Jonathan K Aboagye3, Chris Ensor4, Mary Amanda Dew5, Heather K Hayanga6, Stephen A Esper6, Kyla Joubert2, Matthew R Morrell7, Jonathan D'Cunha2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little in the literature pertaining to cost associated with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in lung transplantation. We sought to evaluate charges associated with the index hospitalization among recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO to identify factors that increase hospital charges in these patients.
METHODS: With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we reviewed data pertaining to patients who received a lung transplant between 2000 and 2011 and stratified them into ECMO and non-ECMO groups based on use of ECMO. Regression modeling was used to identify differences in charges.
RESULTS: Data pertaining to 15,596 recipients of a lung transplant were evaluated, 658 (4.2%) of whom required ECMO. ECMO recipients were more likely to have a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (3.5% versus 1.3%, p = 0.007) or pulmonary hypertension (PH) (9.1% versus 3.0%, p < 0.001). Patients who received a bilateral lung transplant had 32.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.2% to 37.9%, p < 0.001) higher charges. Recipients with PH had 28.7% (95% CI: 14.9% to 42.4%, p = 0.001) higher charges. Median charges for recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO were $780,391.50 versus $324,279.80 for non-ECMO recipients of a lung transplant and were 50.3% (95% CI: 33.0% to 67.5%, p < 0.001) higher. Hospital charges among Medicare enrollees were 6.6% (95% CI: 0.7% to 12.5%, p = 0.028) higher than privately insured recipients of a lung transplant. Black recipients had approximately 34.2% (95% CI: 3.2% to 65.0%, p = 0.030) higher charges. The ECMO group had longer median length of stay (LOS) (25 versus 15 days, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of a lung transplant who required ECMO support had longer LOS and higher hospital charges, specifically among black recipients, recipients with PH, and Medicare enrollees.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688632     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Early trends in ECMO mortality during the first quarters of 2019 and 2020: Could we have predicted the onset of the pandemic?

Authors:  J W Awori Hayanga; Jahnavi Kakuturu; Alper Toker; Fatima Asad; Anthony Siler; Heather Hayanga; Vinay Badhwar
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 1.581

Review 2.  The new allocation era and policy.

Authors:  Luke J Benvenuto; Selim M Arcasoy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Contemporary analysis of charges and mortality in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A cautionary tale.

Authors:  J W Awori Hayanga; Jonathan Aboagye; Errol Bush; Joseph Canner; Heather K Hayanga; Alyssa Klingbeil; Paul McCarthy; James Fugett; Ghulam Abbas; Vinay Badhwar
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-06

4.  Incremental cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac transplant or left ventricular assist device placement in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Joseph Reza; Ashley Mila; Bradford Ledzian; Jingwei Sun; Scott Silvestry
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-07-02

5.  Hospital Costs of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annemieke Oude Lansink-Hartgring; Olivier van Minnen; Karin M Vermeulen; Walter M van den Bergh
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-05-31

6.  Factors associated with intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during lung transplantation.

Authors:  Rong Zhang; Yonghao Xu; Ling Sang; Sibei Chen; Yongbo Huang; Lingbo Nong; Chun Yang; Xuesong Liu; Dongdong Liu; Yin Xi; Weiqun He; Bing Wei; Jianxing He; Yimin Li; Xiaoqing Liu
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2020-04-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.