Literature DB >> 28688492

Quantifying the informativeness for biomedical literature summarization: An itemset mining method.

Milad Moradi1, Nasser Ghadiri2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Automatic text summarization tools can help users in the biomedical domain to access information efficiently from a large volume of scientific literature and other sources of text documents. In this paper, we propose a summarization method that combines itemset mining and domain knowledge to construct a concept-based model and to extract the main subtopics from an input document. Our summarizer quantifies the informativeness of each sentence using the support values of itemsets appearing in the sentence.
METHODS: To address the concept-level analysis of text, our method initially maps the original document to biomedical concepts using the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Then, it discovers the essential subtopics of the text using a data mining technique, namely itemset mining, and constructs the summarization model. The employed itemset mining algorithm extracts a set of frequent itemsets containing correlated and recurrent concepts of the input document. The summarizer selects the most related and informative sentences and generates the final summary.
RESULTS: We evaluate the performance of our itemset-based summarizer using the Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) metrics, performing a set of experiments. We compare the proposed method with GraphSum, TexLexAn, SweSum, SUMMA, AutoSummarize, the term-based version of the itemset-based summarizer, and two baselines. The results show that the itemset-based summarizer performs better than the compared methods. The itemset-based summarizer achieves the best scores for all the assessed ROUGE metrics (R-1: 0.7583, R-2: 0.3381, R-W-1.2: 0.0934, and R-SU4: 0.3889). We also perform a set of preliminary experiments to specify the best value for the minimum support threshold used in the itemset mining algorithm. The results demonstrate that the value of this threshold directly affects the accuracy of the summarization model, such that a significant decrease can be observed in the performance of summarization due to assigning extreme thresholds.
CONCLUSION: Compared to the statistical, similarity, and word frequency methods, the proposed method demonstrates that the summarization model obtained from the concept extraction and itemset mining provides the summarizer with an effective metric for measuring the informative content of sentences. This can lead to an improvement in the performance of biomedical literature summarization.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biomedical text mining; Concept-based text analysis; Data mining; Domain knowledge; Frequent itemset mining; Informativeness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688492     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  4 in total

1.  Identifying Effective Motivational Interviewing Communication Sequences Using Automated Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Mehedi Hasan; April Idalski Carcone; Sylvie Naar; Susan Eggly; Gwen L Alexander; Kathryn E Brogan Hartlieb; Alexander Kotov
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2018-10-31

2.  Increasing Women's Knowledge about HPV Using BERT Text Summarization: An Online Randomized Study.

Authors:  Hind Bitar; Amal Babour; Fatema Nafa; Ohoud Alzamzami; Sarah Alismail
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  A systematic review of automatic text summarization for biomedical literature and EHRs.

Authors:  Mengqian Wang; Manhua Wang; Fei Yu; Yue Yang; Jennifer Walker; Javed Mostafa
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  Clinical Context-Aware Biomedical Text Summarization Using Deep Neural Network: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Muhammad Afzal; Fakhare Alam; Khalid Mahmood Malik; Ghaus M Malik
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.