Literature DB >> 28688158

Determination of hepatocellular carcinoma grade by needle biopsy is unreliable for liver transplant candidate selection.

Colin M Court1,2, Michael P Harlander-Locke3, Daniela Markovic4, Samuel W French5,6, Bita V Naini5, David S Lu7, Steven S Raman7, Fady M Kaldas3,1, Ali Zarrinpar3,1,6, Douglas G Farmer3,1, Richard S Finn6,8, Saeed Sadeghi8, James S Tomlinson1,6,2, Ronald W Busuttil3,1,6, Vatche G Agopian3,1,6.   

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the utility of preoperative needle biopsy (PNB) grading of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a biomarker for liver transplantation (LT) candidate selection. Given the prognostic significance of HCC tumor grade, PNB grading has been proposed as a biomarker for LT candidate selection. Clinicopathologic characteristics of HCC LT recipients (1989-2014) with a PNB were analyzed, and the concordance of PNB grade to explant grade and vascular invasion was assessed to determine whether incorporation of PNB grade to accepted transplant criteria improved candidate selection. Of 965 patients undergoing LT for HCC, 234 (24%) underwent PNB at a median of 280 days prior to transplant. Grade by PNB had poor concordance to final explant pathology (κ = 0.22; P = 0.003), and low sensitivity (29%) and positive predictive value (35%) in identifying poorly differentiated tumors. Vascular invasion was predicted by explant pathologic grade (rs= 0.24; P < 0.001) but not PNB grade (rs = -0.05; P = 0.50). Increasing explant pathology grade (P = 0.02), but not PNB grade (P = 0.65), discriminated post-LT HCC recurrence risk. The incorporation of PNB grade to the established radiologic Milan criteria (MC) did not result in improved prognostication of post-LT recurrence (net reclassification index [NRI] = 0%), whereas grade by explant pathology resulted in significantly improved reclassification of risk (NRI = 19%). Preoperative determination of HCC grade by PNB has low concordance with explant pathologic grade and low sensitivity and positive predictive value in identifying poorly differentiated tumors. PNB grade did not accurately discriminate post-LT HCC recurrence and had no utility in improving prognostication compared with the MC alone. Incorporation of PNB to guide transplant candidate selection appears unjustified. Liver Transplantation 23 1123-1132 2017 AASLD.
© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688158     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  9 in total

1.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for assessment of histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of three methods for positioning region of interest.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Feifei Gao; Min Wang; Zixing Huang; Hehan Tang; Jiaxing Li; Yi Wang; Tong Zhang; Xiaocheng Wei; Dandan Zheng; Bin Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI radiomic features for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yingfan Mao; Jincheng Wang; Yong Zhu; Jun Chen; Liang Mao; Weiwei Kong; Yudong Qiu; Xiaoyan Wu; Yue Guan; Jian He
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  A study of the correlations between IVIM-DWI parameters and the histologic differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Gang Yang; Xue-Qin Gong; Yun-Yun Tao; Ran Wang; Jing Zheng; Cui Yang; Juan Peng; Lin Yang; Jing-Dong Li; Xiao-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Benefit of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Evaluating the Invasiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mengyuan Jing; Yuntai Cao; Peng Zhang; Bin Zhang; Xiaoqiang Lin; Liangna Deng; Tao Han; Junlin Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Development of a novel prognostic nomogram for the early recurrence of liver cancer after curative hepatectomy.

Authors:  Wuzheng Xia; Tianyi Peng; Renguo Guan; Yu Zhou; Cong Zeng; Ye Lin; Zhongshi Wu; Hongmei Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

Review 6.  Patient Selection for Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation-Adjusting the Odds?

Authors:  Daniel Seehofer; Henrik Petrowsky; Stefan Schneeberger; Eric Vibert; Jens Ricke; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Jean-Charles Nault; Thomas Berg
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in liver ultrasound.

Authors:  Liu-Liu Cao; Mei Peng; Xiang Xie; Gong-Quan Chen; Shu-Yan Huang; Jia-Yu Wang; Fan Jiang; Xin-Wu Cui; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.374

8.  Somatic copy number profiling from hepatocellular carcinoma circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Colin M Court; Shuang Hou; Lian Liu; Paul Winograd; Benjamin J DiPardo; Sean X Liu; Pin-Jung Chen; Yazhen Zhu; Matthew Smalley; Ryan Zhang; Saeed Sadeghi; Richard S Finn; Fady M Kaldas; Ronald W Busuttil; Xianghong J Zhou; Hsian-Rong Tseng; James S Tomlinson; Thomas G Graeber; Vatche G Agopian
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 9.  Serum biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maria J Citores; Jose L Lucena; Sara de la Fuente; Valentin Cuervas-Mons
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.