Fernanda Gonçalves Basso1,2,3, Taisa N Pansani4,5, Diana G Soares4,5, Lais M Cardoso4,5, Josimeri Hebling4,5, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa4,5. 1. Araraquara School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. fergbasso@gmail.com. 2. Department of Physiology and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, SP, Brazil. fergbasso@gmail.com. 3. Araraquara School of Dentistry, Campus Araraquara, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, SP, Brazil. fergbasso@gmail.com. 4. Araraquara School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araraquara, SP, Brazil. 5. Araraquara School of Dentistry, Campus Araraquara, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of sodium alendronate (SA) and zoledronic acid (ZA), on the adhesion and metabolism of epithelial cells and gingival fibroblasts to titanium surfaces considering cell functions related to an effective mucosal barrier around the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cells were seeded onto titanium discs and incubated for 24 h. Then, serum-free DMEM containing selected bisphosphonates (0, 0.5, 1, or 5 μM) was added for 24 and 48 h. Factors related to the achievement of an effective mechanical and immunological barrier-cell adhesion, viability, collagen epidermal growth factor, and immunoglobulin synthesis-were evaluated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests as well as by ANOVA and Tukey's tests, (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The presence of bisphosphonates culminated in lower cell adhesion to the titanium discs, particularly for SA at 5 μM (40%) and ZA at all concentrations (from 30 to 50%, according to increased concentrations). Reduced cell viability occurred after exposing these cells to ZA (40%); however, only 5 μM SA-treated cells had decreased viability (30%). Reduced synthesis of growth factors and collagen was observed when cells were reated with ZA (20 and 40%, respectively), while about 70% of IgG synthesis was enhanced. CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonates negatively affected the adhesion and metabolism of oral mucosal cells, and this effect was related to the type of bisphosphonate as well as to concentration and period of treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The negative effects of bisphosphonates on oral mucosal cells can hamper the formation of an effective biological seal in osseointegrated implants.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of sodium alendronate (SA) and zoledronic acid (ZA), on the adhesion and metabolism of epithelial cells and gingival fibroblasts to titanium surfaces considering cell functions related to an effective mucosal barrier around the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cells were seeded onto titanium discs and incubated for 24 h. Then, serum-free DMEM containing selected bisphosphonates (0, 0.5, 1, or 5 μM) was added for 24 and 48 h. Factors related to the achievement of an effective mechanical and immunological barrier-cell adhesion, viability, collagen epidermal growth factor, and immunoglobulin synthesis-were evaluated. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests as well as by ANOVA and Tukey's tests, (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The presence of bisphosphonates culminated in lower cell adhesion to the titanium discs, particularly for SA at 5 μM (40%) and ZA at all concentrations (from 30 to 50%, according to increased concentrations). Reduced cell viability occurred after exposing these cells to ZA (40%); however, only 5 μM SA-treated cells had decreased viability (30%). Reduced synthesis of growth factors and collagen was observed when cells were reated with ZA (20 and 40%, respectively), while about 70% of IgG synthesis was enhanced. CONCLUSION:Bisphosphonates negatively affected the adhesion and metabolism of oral mucosal cells, and this effect was related to the type of bisphosphonate as well as to concentration and period of treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The negative effects of bisphosphonates on oral mucosal cells can hamper the formation of an effective biological seal in osseointegrated implants.
Authors: Cesar Augusto Migliorati; Sook-Bin Woo; Ian Hewson; Andrei Barasch; Linda S Elting; Fred K L Spijkervet; Michael T Brennan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Regina Landesberg; Victoria Woo; Serge Cremers; Matthew Cozin; Darja Marolt; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Stavroula Kousteni; Srikala Raghavan Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Ingo J Diel; Ignac Fogelman; Bilal Al-Nawas; Bodo Hoffmeister; Cesar Migliorati; Joseph Gligorov; Kalervo Väänänen; Liisa Pylkkänen; Martin Pecherstorfer; Matti S Aapro Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Fernanda Gonçalves Basso; Taisa Nogueira Pansani; Camila Fávero de Oliveira; Ana Paula Silveira Turrioni; Diana Gabriela Soares; Josimeri Hebling; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec
Authors: Siri Paulo; Mafalda Laranjo; Ana M Abrantes; João Casalta-Lopes; Kathleen Santos; Ana C Gonçalves; Anabela Baptista Paula; Carlos Miguel Marto; Ana Bela Sarmento-Ribeiro; Eunice Carrilho; Arménio Serra; Maria F Botelho; Manuel M Ferreira Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.623