Eun-Hyung Yoo1, Hyun-Jung Cho2. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konyang University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konyang University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hjchomd@kyuh.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent nucleotide analogue recommended as first-line monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated the clinical response to TDF monotherapy in Korean CHB patients. METHODS: A total of 90 CHB patients [55 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 35 HBeAg-negative] who received TDF monotherapy for >2year, were enrolled. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) levels, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBeAg, anti-HBe and HBV DNA levels were measured during treatment. Virologic response (VR) was defined as undetectable HBV DNA level. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of complete virologic response (CVR) were 75.6% and 89.9% at months 12 and 24, respectively. The cumulative CVR rates were significantly higher in HBeAg-negative than HBeAg-positive group (P<0.001). HBeAg loss/seroconversion was observed in 21 (38.2%) out of 55 HBeAg-positive patients. One HBeAg-positive and 1 HBeAg-negative patients (2.2%) achieved HBsAg loss at months 6 and 8 of TDF therapy, respectively. Baseline HBV DNA level and qHBsAg were significant predictive factors for a CVR (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Virologic, serologic, biochemical responses were achieved in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients under 24-month TDF therapy. Monitoring using baseline HBV DNA and qHBsAg levels would be helpful to predict CVR.
BACKGROUND:Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a potent nucleotide analogue recommended as first-line monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated the clinical response to TDF monotherapy in Korean CHB patients. METHODS: A total of 90 CHB patients [55 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 35 HBeAg-negative] who received TDF monotherapy for >2year, were enrolled. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) levels, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBeAg, anti-HBe and HBV DNA levels were measured during treatment. Virologic response (VR) was defined as undetectable HBV DNA level. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of complete virologic response (CVR) were 75.6% and 89.9% at months 12 and 24, respectively. The cumulative CVR rates were significantly higher in HBeAg-negative than HBeAg-positive group (P<0.001). HBeAg loss/seroconversion was observed in 21 (38.2%) out of 55 HBeAg-positive patients. One HBeAg-positive and 1 HBeAg-negative patients (2.2%) achieved HBsAg loss at months 6 and 8 of TDF therapy, respectively. Baseline HBV DNA level and qHBsAg were significant predictive factors for a CVR (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Virologic, serologic, biochemical responses were achieved in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients under 24-month TDF therapy. Monitoring using baseline HBV DNA and qHBsAg levels would be helpful to predict CVR.