Literature DB >> 28687327

Masking of random-walk motion by flicker, and its role in the allocation of motion in the on-line jitter illusion.

Adela S Y Park1, Phillip A Bedggood1, Andrew B Metha1, Andrew J Anderson2.   

Abstract

Typically, perceptual stabilization mechanisms make us unaware of the retinal image motion produced by the small, involuntary eye movements our eyes constantly make during fixation. The breakdown of perceptual stability is demonstrated by the on-line jitter illusion, in which a circular static pattern appears to jitter coherently when surrounded by a flickering annular pattern. Although both regions of the stimulus are subject to retinal motion from eye movements, the visual system attributes this motion to the central static region in the form of visual jitter, while the surrounding flickering region remains perceptually stable. We investigated factors influencing this allocation of motion and reference frame in the on-line jitter illusion. The flickering of the surround was found to impair the detection of simultaneous random-walk motion in this area, giving a detection reliability of around 80% for motion approximating that from fixational eye movements. Changes to spatial texture and location of flicker (centre vs. surrounding annulus) had little effect on the final percept. However, use of a nonconcentric stimulus resulted in a marked reduction in apparent jitter in all subjects. Our results suggest for the on-line jitter illusion, allocation of motion and reference frame is influenced by the general principle that, if one region surrounds another, the surrounding region tends to be allocated as the frame of reference. When this factor is controlled for, spatial textures, location of flicker, and the masking of motion by flicker have a smaller but measurable influence on the final percept.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flicker; Motion energy; Motion perception; Perceptual stability; Reference frame allocation; Small eye movements of fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687327     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  2 in total

1.  Interactions of flicker and motion.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Sion Gutentag; Christopher D Blair; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Theta-burst stimulation causally affects side perception in the Deutsch's octave illusion.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Stefania Della Penna; Vittorio Pizzella; Filippo Zappasodi; Gian Luca Romani; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Alfredo Brancucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.