| Literature DB >> 28687046 |
Dong-Won Oh1, Ji-Hyun Kang1, Hyo-Jung Lee1, Sang-Duk Han2, Min-Hyung Kang2, Yie-Hyuk Kwon2, Joon-Ho Jun2, Dong-Wook Kim3, Yun-Seok Rhee4, Ju-Young Kim5, Eun-Seok Park6, Chung-Woong Park1.
Abstract
The film forming gel, adhered to skin surfaces upon application and formed a film, has an advantage onto skin to provide protection and continuous drug release to the application site. This study aimed to prepare a chitosan-based film forming gel containing ketoprofen (CbFG) and to evaluate the CbFG and film from CbFG (CbFG-film). CbFG were prepared with chitosan, lactic acid and various skin permeation enhancers. The physicochemical characteristics were evaluated by texture analysis, viscometry, SEM, DSC, XRD and FT-IR. To identify the mechanism of skin permeation, in vitro skin permeation study was conducted with a Franz diffusion cell and excised SD-rat and hairless mouse dorsal skin. In vivo efficacy assessment in mono-iodoacetate (MIA)-induced rheumatoid arthritis animal model was also conducted. CbFG was successfully prepared and, after applying CbFG to the excised rat dorsal skin, the CbFG-film was also formed well. The physicochemical characteristics of CbFG and CbFG-film could be explained by the grafting of oleic acid onto chitosan in the absence of catalysts. In addition, CbFG containing oleic acid had a higher skin permeation rate in comparison with any other candidate enhancers. The in vivo efficacy study also confirmed significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. Consequently, we report the successful preparation of chitosan-based film forming gel containing ketoprofen with excellent mechanical properties, skin permeation and anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects.Entities:
Keywords: Chitosan-based film-forming gel; anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects; chitosan; dermal drug delivery systems; ketoprofen; oleic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28687046 PMCID: PMC8241006 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1346001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Formulation of CbFG containing permeation enhancer.
| weight ratio % | CbFG-OA 5% | CbFG-NMP 5% | CbFG-Tw80 5% | CbFG-Cr40 5% | CbFG-OA 3% | CbFG-OA 2% | CbFG-OA 1% | CbFG-OA 0.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketoprofen | 3 | |||||||
| Chitosan | 3 | |||||||
| Lactic acid | 4 | |||||||
| Propylene glycol | 2 | |||||||
| Oleic acid | 5 | – | – | – | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 |
| NMP | – | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Tween 80 | – | – | 5 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cremophor RH 40 | – | – | – | 5 | – | – | – | – |
| 95% Ethanol | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| D.W. | 43 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 47.5 |
| Total | 100 | |||||||
Inter- and Intra-data on ketoprofen analysis using HPLC.
| Concentration of Ketoprofen (μg/ml) ( | Inter day | Intra day | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | % RSD | Mean ± SD | % RSD | |
| 15.60 | 15.72 ± 0.20 | 1.25 | 15.34 ± 0.08 | 0.53 |
| 62.50 | 62.26 ± 0.35 | 0.57 | 62.76 ± 0.04 | 0.07 |
| 250.00 | 249.71 ± 0.94 | 0.38 | 249.62 ± 0.03 | 0.01 |
Figure 1.Transparency changes of CbFG-film during film formation; (A) initial state after CbFG application, (B) 5 min after CbFG application; (C) 10 min after CbFG application.
Figure 2.Mechanical properties of CbFG-films; (A) film tensile strength, (B) maximum elongation at break. One-way ANOVA analysis, *p < 0.05 (n = 4) compared with film containing OA 0%.
Figure 3.SEM micrographs of CbFG-films without or with OA.
Figure 4.FT-IR spectra of CbFG-films without or with OA.
Figure 5.XRD diffractograms of CbFG-films without or with OA, raw chitosan and raw ketoprofen.
Figure 6.DSC thermograms of CbFG-films without or with OA and raw ketoprofen.
Figure 7.In vitro skin permeation profiles of CbFG-film containing ketoprofen; (A) with different kinds of enhancers through excised SD-rat skin, (B) with different amount oleic acid as an enhancer through excised hairless mouse skin. One-way ANOVA analysis,* p < 0.05 (n = 3) compared with Commercial product.
In vitro skin permeation rate and lag time of CbFG-film through excised SD-rat skin and hairless mouse skin.
| Commercial product | CbFG Non enhancer | CbFG OA 5% * | CbFG NMP 5% | CbFG Tw80 5% | CbFG Cr40 5% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flux (μg/cm2/h) | 39.9 ± 6.1 | 12.6 ± 5.1 | 75.4 ± 5.0 | 13.6 ± 1.0 | 24.3 ± 1.5 | 15.2 ± 3.3 | ||||
| Lag time (h) | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | ||||
| | Commercial product | CbFG OA 3%* | CbFG OA 2%* | CbFG OA 1%* | CbFG OA 0.5%* | |||||
| Flux (μg/cm2/h) | 95.5 ± 28.0 | 209.9 ± 17.6 | 281.7 ± 77.0 | 264.9 ± 7.3 | 308.6 ± 11.5 | |||||
| Lag time (h) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | |||||
One-way ANOVA analysis.
p < 0.05 (n = 3) compared with Commercial product.
Figure 8.In vivo efficacy study of CbFG-film-OA 0.5% and commercial product; (A) difference in swelling of each hind paw, (B) difference in weight of each hind paw, (C) PGEM levels in joint tissue for 2 days after administration. One-way ANOVA analysis: *p < 0.05 (n = 6), compared with positive control; **p < 0.05 (n = 6), compared with positive control; #p < 0.05 (n = 6), compared with negative control; ##p < 0.05 (n = 6), compared with negative control; +p < 0.05 (n = 6), compared with Commercial product; ++p < 0.01 (n = 6), compared with Commercial product.