| Literature DB >> 28687039 |
Cheng-Long Shen1, Li-Xia Su1, Jin-Hao Zang1, Xin-Jian Li1, Qing Lou2, Chong-Xin Shan3,4.
Abstract
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is an important product of oxidase-based enzymatic reactions, such as glucose/glucose oxidase (GOD) reaction. Therefore, the probing of generated H2O2 for achieving the detection of various carbohydrates and their oxidases is very significative. Herein, we report one kind of dual-emission carbon nanodots (CDs) that can serve as novel dual-mode nanosensors with both fluorometric and colorimetric output for the selective detection of H2O2. The dual-model nanosensors are established only by the undecorated dual-emission CDs, where significant fluorometric and colorimetric changes are observed with the addition of different concentrations of H2O2 in the CD solution, which benefit to the achievement of the naked-eye detection for H2O2. The mechanism of the nanosensors can be attributed to the fact that the external chemical stimuli like hydroxyl radicals from H2O2 bring about the change of surface properties and the aggregation of CDs, which dominate the emission and absorption of CDs. The constructed dual-mode nanosensors exhibit good biocompatibility and high selectivity toward H2O2 with a linear detection range spanning from 0.05 to 0.5 M and allow the detection of H2O2 as low as 14 mM.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon nanodots; Detection; Dual-mode nanosensors; Fluorescence
Year: 2017 PMID: 28687039 PMCID: PMC5500605 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2214-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1a TEM image of the CDs. Insets show the HRTEM image of the CDs. b XRD pattern of the CDs. c Raman spectroscopy of the CDs. d FTIR spectroscopy of the CDs. e Fluorescence variation of CDs after adding 0.5 M H2O2. Insets show photographs of CDs before (left) and after (right) adding the H2O2 under UV light. f Colorimetric variation of CDs after adding 0.5 M H2O2. Insets show photographs of CDs before (left) and after (right) adding the H2O2 under daylight
Fig. 2a, b Fluorescence decay of CDs before (a) and after (b) adding 0.5 M H2O2. c, d XPS (N1s) of CDs before (c) and after (d) adding 0.5 M H2O2
Photophysical data for CDs (3.75 μg mL−1 in deionized water) before and after 0.5 M H2O2 treatment
| States |
|
|
| QYd (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 450 | 7.96 | 0.999 | 5.5 |
| Before | 500 | 7.12 | 0.999 | |
| After | 450 | 4.53 | 0.993 | 4.6 |
| After | 500 | 4.83 | 0.996 |
aPL peak excited at 405 nm
bPL lifetime
cGoodness of fit
dPL quantum yield excited at 365 nm
Fig. 3The possible sensing mechanism for CDs before (left) and after (right) adding H2O2
Fig. 4a Fluorescence spectra of CDs in the presence of different H2O2 concentrations. b Calibration curve of I 500/I 450 of the CDs vs. H2O2 concentration. Insets show the linear detection range of I 500/I 450 of the CDs vs. H2O2 concentration. c Photographic images of the fluorescence CD solution under different concentrations of H2O2. d UV-Vis spectra of CDs in the presence of different H2O2 concentrations. e Calibration curve of A 595/A 555 of the CDs vs. H2O2 concentration. f Photographic images of the CD solution under different concentrations of H2O2
Fig. 5a, c Fluorescence ratio I 500/I 450 of solution containing CDs and various interferent cations (a) and oxidants (c). b, d Absorption ratio A 595/A 555 of solution containing CDs and various interferent cations (b) and oxidants (d)
Fig. 6Cell viability of A549 cells after 48-h incubation in the different concentration of CDs