Thomas Arthur1,2, Richard Gartrell3, Bavahuna Manoharan4, David Parker1. 1. Department of Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. 3. Department of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia. 4. Department of Surgery, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency appendicectomy is the most common emergency surgical procedure performed in Australia. Despite this frequency, there is a relative paucity of contemporary, broad-based, local data that examine how emergency appendicectomies are currently performed and what are the outcomes from these operations. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective, observational study was performed. Patients were recruited by local investigators for a period of 2 months with 30-day follow-up. Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they underwent an emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. The primary outcome of the study was the negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), with secondary outcomes including 30-day complication rates, method of operation and conversion rates. RESULTS: A total of 1189 patients were recruited across 27 centres. The NAR across all centres was 19.0%. 98.2% of appendicectomies were performed with a laparoscopic-first approach. The rate of conversion from laparoscopy to open operation was 2.4%. 9.4% of patients were recorded as having one or more of the following complications: readmission (6.6%), surgical site infection (1.9%), intra-abdominal abscess (2.7%) or further intervention (1.5%). Patients who had an open operation had higher rates of readmission and surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: The NAR found in this study is within the traditional measures of acceptance; however, this rate is high when measured against modern international benchmarks.
BACKGROUND: Emergency appendicectomy is the most common emergency surgical procedure performed in Australia. Despite this frequency, there is a relative paucity of contemporary, broad-based, local data that examine how emergency appendicectomies are currently performed and what are the outcomes from these operations. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective, observational study was performed. Patients were recruited by local investigators for a period of 2 months with 30-day follow-up. Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they underwent an emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. The primary outcome of the study was the negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), with secondary outcomes including 30-day complication rates, method of operation and conversion rates. RESULTS: A total of 1189 patients were recruited across 27 centres. The NAR across all centres was 19.0%. 98.2% of appendicectomies were performed with a laparoscopic-first approach. The rate of conversion from laparoscopy to open operation was 2.4%. 9.4% of patients were recorded as having one or more of the following complications: readmission (6.6%), surgical site infection (1.9%), intra-abdominal abscess (2.7%) or further intervention (1.5%). Patients who had an open operation had higher rates of readmission and surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: The NAR found in this study is within the traditional measures of acceptance; however, this rate is high when measured against modern international benchmarks.
Authors: Maciej Walędziak; Anna Lasek; Michał Wysocki; Michael Su; Maciej Bobowicz; Piotr Myśliwiec; Kamil Astapczyk; Mateusz Burdzel; Karolina Chruściel; Rafał Cygan; Wojciech Czubek; Natalia Dowgiałło-Wnukiewicz; Jakub Droś; Paula Franczak; Wacław Hołówko; Artur Kacprzyk; Wojciech Konrad Karcz; Jakub Kenig; Paweł Konrad; Arkadiusz Kopiejć; Adam Kot; Karolina Krakowska; Maciej Kukla; Agnieszka Leszko; Leszek Łozowski; Piotr Major; Wojciech Makarewicz; Paulina Malinowska-Torbicz; Maciej Matyja; Maciej Michalik; Adam Niekurzak; Damian Nowiński; Radomir Ostaszewski; Małgorzata Pabis; Małgorzata Polańska-Płachta; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Tomasz Stefura; Anna Stępień; Paweł Szabat; Rafał Śmiechowski; Sebastian Tomaszewski; Viktor von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt; Maciej Wasilczuk; Mateusz Wierdak; Anna Wojdyła; Jan Wojciech Wroński; Leszek Zwolakiewicz; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 4.379