Tannaz Ahadi1, Neda Taghvadoost2, Soheila Aminimoghaddam3, Bijan Forogh1, Roxana Bazazbehbahani4, Gholam Reza Raissi5. 1. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital, Neuromuscular Research Center, Tehran, Iran. 2. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 3. Gynecology-Oncology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 4. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 5. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firoozgar Hospital, Neuromuscular Research Center, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: grezaraissi@yahoo.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent disorder which seriously affects the sufferer's quality of life. The main goal of this study was to evaluate biofeedback impact on quality of life in women with mild to moderate POP. STUDY DESIGN:40 females in stages I and II POP were allocated into 2 groups. One group received pelvic floor muscle exercise and lifestyle advice in addition to biofeedback twice a week for 4 weeks, while the other received a lifestyle advice sheet and pelvic floor muscle exercise without biofeedback. A valid Persian version of P-QOL questionnaire was applied to assess the patients̕ quality of life at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow up. Pressure biofeedback and Physical examination were also performed in order to determine pelvic floor muscle strength and staging of the prolapse, respectively. Collected data were analyzed by mixed ANOVA test using SPSS 22. RESULTS:Biofeedback improved the quality of life in seven of nine P-QOL domains. However, it had no significant impact either on pelvic floor muscle strength or on the stage of the prolapse. CONCLUSION:Biofeedback could be considered as a non-invasive treatment leading to quality of life promotion in women with stages I and II POP.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent disorder which seriously affects the sufferer's quality of life. The main goal of this study was to evaluate biofeedback impact on quality of life in women with mild to moderate POP. STUDY DESIGN: 40 females in stages I and II POP were allocated into 2 groups. One group received pelvic floor muscle exercise and lifestyle advice in addition to biofeedback twice a week for 4 weeks, while the other received a lifestyle advice sheet and pelvic floor muscle exercise without biofeedback. A valid Persian version of P-QOL questionnaire was applied to assess the patients̕ quality of life at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow up. Pressure biofeedback and Physical examination were also performed in order to determine pelvic floor muscle strength and staging of the prolapse, respectively. Collected data were analyzed by mixed ANOVA test using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Biofeedback improved the quality of life in seven of nine P-QOL domains. However, it had no significant impact either on pelvic floor muscle strength or on the stage of the prolapse. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback could be considered as a non-invasive treatment leading to quality of life promotion in women with stages I and II POP.
Authors: Suzanne Hagen; Carol Bugge; Sarah G Dean; Andrew Elders; Jean Hay-Smith; Mary Kilonzo; Doreen McClurg; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Wael Agur; Federico Andreis; Joanne Booth; Maria Dimitrova; Nicola Gillespie; Cathryn Glazener; Aileen Grant; Karen L Guerrero; Lorna Henderson; Marija Kovandzic; Alison McDonald; John Norrie; Nicole Sergenson; Susan Stratton; Anne Taylor; Louise R Williams Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.014