Jennifer D'Anto1, Wlodzimierz Wnuk2, Andrea O Rossetti3, Laurent A Decosterd4, Thierry Buclin4, Jan Novy5. 1. Bachelor of Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Laboratory of Lavigny, Lavigny, Switzerland. 3. Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Switzerland. 4. Laboratory and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Service of Biomedicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: jan.novy@chuv.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drug titration in epilepsy remains mostly empirical. Since in practice seizure remission may be obtained with low doses, we aimed to determine whether patients in remission have lower lamotrigine levels than those with ongoing seizures. METHODS: Retrospective comparison of the distribution of lamotrigine levels among unselected patients in remission and with ongoing seizures. Remission was defined as 3 times the longuest interseizure interval and at least one year. Only trough levels were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, we identified 93 adults, among whom 10 were in remission. Patients in remission had significantly (p=0.008) lower serum levels (median 2.3mg/L, range: 0.7-8.2) than those with ongoing seizures (median 5.4mg/L, range: 1.1-18.2). We did not find any patient in remission with levels higher than 8.2mg/L. Distribution of dosages also differed among the groups, but less significantly (median: 175 vs 300mg, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: An association between lamotrigine serum levels and seizure response can be observed. This suggests the existence of a ceiling level, above which remission is unlikely and should prompt antiepileptic medication switch rather than further up-titration of lamotrigine in drug-naïve patients with epilepsy.
BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drug titration in epilepsy remains mostly empirical. Since in practice seizure remission may be obtained with low doses, we aimed to determine whether patients in remission have lower lamotrigine levels than those with ongoing seizures. METHODS: Retrospective comparison of the distribution of lamotrigine levels among unselected patients in remission and with ongoing seizures. Remission was defined as 3 times the longuest interseizure interval and at least one year. Only trough levels were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, we identified 93 adults, among whom 10 were in remission. Patients in remission had significantly (p=0.008) lower serum levels (median 2.3mg/L, range: 0.7-8.2) than those with ongoing seizures (median 5.4mg/L, range: 1.1-18.2). We did not find any patient in remission with levels higher than 8.2mg/L. Distribution of dosages also differed among the groups, but less significantly (median: 175 vs 300mg, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: An association between lamotrigine serum levels and seizure response can be observed. This suggests the existence of a ceiling level, above which remission is unlikely and should prompt antiepileptic medication switch rather than further up-titration of lamotrigine in drug-naïve patients with epilepsy.