Literature DB >> 28686807

Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal DNA testing for trisomy 21: implications for implementation in China.

Jiajie Jin1,2, Junwen Yang1,2, Yingyao Chen1,2, Jiayan Huang1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review clinical validation studies of massive parallel sequencing (MPS) technology in prenatal screening for trisomy 21 and to explore the potential implementation strategies in China compared with those in developing countries.
METHODS: Searches of the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Biosis Previews, and three major Chinese databases were performed to identify all the peer-reviewed articles published between 1 January 2011 and 15 October 2016. We also reviewed and discussed the potential challenges and risks in the future promotion of MPS technology in China compared with those in developing countries.
RESULTS: The weighted pooled sensitivity and specificity of MPS technology for the prenatal detection of trisomy 21 were 99.7% (95% CI 98.3-99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI 99.9-100.0%), respectively, based on a meta-analysis of 44 included studies. An additional meta-analysis was conducted based on the 25 included studies that were performed in medical/genetic sequencing institutions in mainland China, showing a weighted pooled sensitivity and specificity of MPS technology as 99.5% (95% CI 98.7-99.8%) and 100% (95% CI 99.9-100%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: MPS technology offers effective screening performance for trisomy 21 but should be cautiously promoted due to its clinical limitations and challenges that stem from the ethics and business aspects.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28686807     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

1.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

2.  The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikita M John; Stuart J Wright; Sean P Gavan; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-06-22

3.  The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhu; XiaoXiao Ling; Wenru Shang; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Wenru Shang; Yang Wan; Jianan Chen; Yanqiu Du; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.