Literature DB >> 28685883

Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of CINtec® PLUS in ThinPrep® cytology preparations.

M McMenamin1, M McKenna1, A McDowell2, C Dawson3, R McKenna3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the dual-stain biomarker, CINtec® PLUS cytology in ThinPrep® specimens, for improved specificity in the detection of cervical disease in women testing human papillomavirus (HPV) positive.
METHODS: A total of 972 cases of HPV-positive women from a triage and primary HPV screening population were selected from an ongoing study evaluating the clinical performance of CINtec® PLUS cytology. For reproducibility analyses, three cytotechnologists rescreened sets of slides which they had previously reported themselves and which were previously reported by each of the other cytotechnologists. The original results of slides previously screened by each of the three cytotechnologists were also compared with the results of an expert reference evaluator.
RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer agreement for paired evaluations between reviewers ranged from 82.8% to 94.9% (kappa 0.65-0.91) and 89.2% to 93% (kappa 0.83-0.88), respectively. Reproducibility analyses between the cytotechnologists and the reference evaluator revealed agreements ranging from 95.5% to 98% (kappa 0.89-0.96).
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the dual-stain biomarker showed a high level of agreement across all evaluators suggesting that CINtec® PLUS cytology will perform well in the hands of cytotechnologists and pathologist reviewers and could be introduced into cellular pathology laboratories that employ ThinPrep® LBC with a minimum effort.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CINtec® PLUS cytology reproducibility; HPV primary screening; ThinPrep® LBC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685883     DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  4 in total

Review 1.  False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.

Authors:  Anna Macios; Andrzej Nowakowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Interobserver variability and accuracy of p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining on conventional cervical smears.

Authors:  Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik; Tine Jerman; Nataša Nolde; Alenka Repše Fokter; Sandra Jezeršek; Živa Pohar Marinšek; Ulrika Klopčič; Simona Hutter Čelik; Kristina Gornik Kramberger; Maja Primic Žakelj; Urška Ivanuš
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  Evaluation of the training program for p16/ Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining interpretation for laboratory staff without experience in cervical cytology and immunocytochemistry.

Authors:  Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik; Ziva Pohar Marinsek; Janja Zalar; Hermina Rozina; Nika Kotnik; Tine Jerman; Jerneja Varl; Urska Ivanus
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Implementation of p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology in a Danish routine screening laboratory: Importance of adequate training and experience.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Line W Gustafson; Pia N Christensen; Rikke Brøndum; Berit Andersen; Rikke H Andersen; Mette Tranberg
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.