Literature DB >> 28685532

Proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation in treating intertrochanteric femoral fractures of elderly subjects.

L Jia1,2, K Zhang2, Z G Wang2, L Wang2, S Y Yang2, Y P Zheng1.   

Abstract

This study compared the effect of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures of elderly subjects and evaluated the effect of PFNA internal fixation. Two hundred and sixteen elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture who received treatment in Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Shandong, China were selected. They were divided into a PFNA group which adopted PFNA for internal fixation and a DHS group which adopted DHS for internal fixation, 108 cases in each group. The physical condition of the patients in the two groups were recorded on admittance. The fracture was typed according to Evans-Jensen classification criteria. Patients were followed up after surgery to evaluate the postoperative recovery and Harris score of hip joint function. Except for the length of hospital stay, the length of incision, interoperative blood loss, volume of drainage and duration of operation of the PFNA group were all superior to those of the DHS group (P less than 0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications of the PFNA group was lower than that of the DHS group (P less than 0.05); the early Harris score of the treatment was superior to that of the DHS group, and there was no remarkable difference (P>0.05). PFNA has more advantages than DHS in treating intertrochanteric femoral fracture of the elderly; hence it is worth wide application in clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28685532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents        ISSN: 0393-974X            Impact factor:   1.711


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative hidden blood loss for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly by different intramedullary fixations: A randomized controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Huayong Zheng; Yang Zhang; Hao Wang; Tiansheng Sun; Qicai Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Femoral trochanteric fracture: PFNA spiral blade placement with the aid of an angler.

Authors:  Ye Yu; Keliang Pan; Gangxiang Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  An analysis of perioperative hidden blood loss in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: bone density is an important influencing factor.

Authors:  Haidong Cui; Kai Chen; Shujun Lv; Chaoqun Yuan; Youhua Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  [Application of wire reduction technique guided by minimally invasive wire introducer in treatment of difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  Jinxi Hu; Changren He; Fang Liu; Fei Wen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty should not be selected as the primary option for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jincheng Huang; Yanxin Shi; Weiyu Pan; Zhen Wang; Yonghui Dong; Yu Bai; Aiguo Wang; Yongqiang Zhao; Jia Zheng; Hongkai Lian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty should not be selected as the primary option for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients aged 85 years or more.

Authors:  Wen-Le Tan; Yan-Xin Shi; Jing-Yi Zhang; Chan-Rui Tang; Qing-Bin Guan; Jian-Ji Tan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.