| Literature DB >> 28685335 |
Anetta Zioła-Frankowska1, Łukasz Kubaszewski2, Mikołaj Dąbrowski2, Marcin Frankowski3.
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence concerning the significant role of silicon in development and composition of both connective and bone tissue. Bio-essential silicon shows strong chemical and biological affinity to aluminum, which is toxic and biologically inessential element. The presence of silicon was confirmed in a variety of tissues; however, it has never been examined in intervertebral disc tissue, neither in healthy nor in degenerated one. In this paper, for the first time in the literature, we present the content of silicon in the degenerated intervertebral disc tissue. We also compared the results of silicon analysis with aluminum values in degenerated intervertebral disc tissue in humans. We used chemometric methods to find correlations and similarities between silicon, aluminum, and elements associated with tissue metabolism (Mg) and degenerative processes (Zn and Cu). The presence of silicon was confirmed in all 30 samples harvested from 22 patients operated on due to degenerative changes. Its concentration was within the range of 5.37-12.8 μg g-1 d.w., with the mean concentration of 7.82 μg g-1 d.w. The analysis showed significant correlation between Si and both Al and Mg and weak or negative correlation with Zn and Cu, where the latter was probably the result of degenerative processes. Although silicon is considered essential in glycosaminoglycan and collagen synthesis in connective tissue, it did not show any correlation nor similarities with elements reflecting changes associated with the degenerative process of the intervertebral disc. Silicon showed significant correlation with aluminum, similar to those observed in other human tissues.Entities:
Keywords: Aluminum; Intervertebral disc tissue; Si-Al correlation; Silicon; Spine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28685335 PMCID: PMC5570785 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9588-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Operating conditions and accessories employed in ICP-OES spectrometer (Shimadzu ICPE-9820) for analysis of intervertebral discs samples
| Parameter and accessories | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Radio frequency power generator | 1.2 kW | |
| Gas type | Argon | |
| Plasma gas flow rate | 10.0 L min−1 | |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate | 0.6 L min−1 | |
| Nebulization gas flow rate | 0.7 L min−1 | |
| Plasma view | Vertical torch; axial view | |
| Selected emission lines (atomic) | 251.611 (BEC = 0.084) | |
| 212.412 (BEC = 0.188) | ||
| Torch | Mini-torch (quartz) | |
| Nebulizer | Burgener NX-175 | |
| Chamber | Cyclone (glass) | |
| Drain | Gravity fed | |
| Injector tube | Quartz (1.2 mm i.d.) | |
| Background correction | 2-points | |
| Number of replicates | 3 | |
| Exposure time | 15 s | |
| Peristaltic pump | Solvent rinse | 15 s |
| Sample rinse | 15 s | |
| Sample uptake rate | 1 ml min−1 | |
| Spectrometer | Echelle optics | Range of wavelength:167 to 800 nm |
| Resolution | ≤0.005 nm at 200 nm | |
| Atmospheric removal system | Rotary vacuum pump ≤10 Pa | |
| Device | CCD (charge coupled device) detector | |
| Pixel number | 1024 × 1024 pixels (1 in.) | |
| Pixel size | 20 μm × 20 μm | |
| Cooling control | Peltier device | |
Concentration of Al, Cu, Mg, and Zn in intervertebral disc (Kubaszewski et al. 2014)
| Element | AM | S.D. | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| [μg g−1 d.w.] | |||
| Al | 0.664 | 0.289 | 0.166–1.271 |
| Cu | 3.41 | 4.045 | 0.97–23.64 |
| Mg | 800.1 | 525.5 | 182.6–2132 |
| Zn | 39.60 | 35.95 | 10.56–184.5 |
AM arithmetic mean, S.D. standard deviation
Spearman’s rank correlation order of the elements measured in intervertebral disc samples
| Spearman | Al | Si | Cu | Mg | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | x | ||||
| Si | 0.47* | x | |||
| Cu | −0.25 | −0.50* | x | ||
| Mg | 0.50* | 0.46* | −0.32 | x | |
| Zn | 0.27 | 0.09 | −0.08 | 0.75* | x |
*Statistically significant; p value <0.01
Silicon concentration in intervertebral disc (in μg g−1 d.w.) according to the selected factors
| Factors |
| AM ± S.D. [μg g−1] | Med. (QL-QU) [μg g−1] | Mann-Whitney | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 18 | 8.3 ± 1.6 | 8.3 (7.2–8.6) | 0.046 |
| Women | 12 | 7.1 ± 1.8 | 6.5 (5.6–8.3) | ||
| Implants | No | 21 | 8 ± 1.9 | 8.3 (6.6–8.8) | 0.46 |
| Yes | 9 | 7.4 ± 1.5 | 7.4 (6.5–8.3) | ||
| Intervertebral disc from | Lumbar | 18 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | 8.4 (7.2–9.7) | 0.016 |
| Cervical | 12 | 6.8 ± 1.2 | 6.5 (5.7–8.1) | ||
N number of samples, Med. median, QL lower quartile, QU upper quartile
Spearman rank correlation between Si, the other analyzed metals, and clinical factors (gender, implants, type of spine, patient’s age, and Pfirrmann et al. (2001) score)
| Sex | Implants | Intervertebral disc from | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si | Men | Women | No | Yes | Lumbar | Cervical | |
| Al | 0.47* | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.53* | 0.77* | 0.59* | 0.48 |
| Cu | −0.40* | 0.02 | −0.29 | −0.35 | −0.70* | −0.24 | −0.83* |
| Mg | 0.56* | 0.21 | 0.68* | 0.65* | 0.60 | 0.52* | 0.76* |
| Zn | 0.20 | −0.05 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.67* | 0.16 | 0.62* |
| age | −0.03 | 0.26 | −0.27 | −0.22 | 0.79* | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| Pfirrmann | −0.06 | −0.13 | −0.04 | −0.09 | 0.00 | 0.12 | −0.42 |
*Statistically significant
Fig. 1Scatterplot of standardized Si against standardized Al
Fig. 2Scatterplot of standardized Si against standardized Mg
Fig. 3Scatterplot of standardized Si against standardized Cu
Fig. 4Scatterplot of standardized Si against standardized Zn
Fig. 5Smallest-distance graph