| Literature DB >> 28685331 |
Alicja Kicińska1, Magdalena Mamak2, Monika Skrzypek2.
Abstract
The authors dealt with some hazardous elements, i.e. As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, contained in sands of the sandboxes localized in playgrounds of seven spas in southern Poland (CEE). The following determinations were made: the total contents of metals, the most mobile metals (water-leachable fraction) and the metals available to plants and organisms (CaCl2- and EDTA-extractable fractions). The totals of the metals are below the upper limits of the values recommended for soils of the protected areas (type A). The mobility of the metals is low: the forms leachable with water range from 0.7% of the total content (TC) of Pb to 13.4% TC of Cd. The forms available to living organisms contain considerably higher quantities of the metals: from 2.3% TC of Ni to 22.6% TC of As in CaCl2-extractable fractions and from 0.7% TC of Cr to 82% TC of As in EDTA-extractable fractions. An assessment of the health risk indicates that children are exposed to the metals present in the sandboxes mostly due to inadvertent swallowing of "dirt" from their hands. The highest are the HQingestion indexes of As and Cr, both for the 3-year-old permanent spa residents (5.74E-02 and 1.71E-02, respectively) and the spa visitors of the same age (7.47E-03 and 2.22E-03, respectively) and the 6-year-old residents (4.31E-02 and 1.28E-02, respectively) and visitors (5.60E-03 and 1.66E-03, respectively). The health risk indexes HI in the case of non-cancerogenic substances for children 3 and 6 years old are for spa residents, 9.59E-02 and 7.19E-02, respectively, and for children visitors, who are exposed to environmental factors for a much shorter time than the residents, 1.25E-02 and 9.35E-03, respectively. All the risk indexes have their values significantly below 1, which proves the lack of deleterious effects resulting from the exposition of children to the elements considered. The children of both age groups, exposed to the cancerogenic substances, are endangered mainly by As. The risk values of the cancerogenic As for 3- and 6-year-old children residents are 1.27E-06 and 1.90E-06, respectively, and for children visitors of the same ages 1.65E-07 and 2.47E-07, respectively. These values are significantly lower than a permissible level of "1∙10E-05" and means that also in this case, the health risk is minimal. The risk values calculated for the remaining metals are much lower and follow the sequence Cr > Co > Cd. However, an adverse impact of some sand-contained pollutants that are attributed to the motor traffic (Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr, Co and Pb) and low emissions (mainly As and Cd) has been established in the spa resorts in question.Entities:
Keywords: CEE; Health resorts; Heavy metals; Risk assessment; Sandboxes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28685331 PMCID: PMC5570792 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9531-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Location of sampling sites withing the border of Malopolska Province
Sampling sites and short characteristic of spas
| Health resort (symbol) | Sampling site | Coordinance | Characteristics of the playground area | Number and kinds of medicinal treatmenta | Natural healing resources/the healing properties of the climate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | N | |||||
| Szczawnica (S) | S1 | 20° 28′ 09.69″ | 49° 25′ 36.59″ | Private area, next to main road | 5: A, C, F, G, I | Mineral water/mountain climate, moderately incentives, moderated by forest areas (stands of conifers) |
| S2 | 20° 28′ 58.24″ | 49° 25′ 31.41″ | Solar sanatorium, next to way exit | |||
| S3 | 20° 29′ 09.37″ | 49° 25′ 28.94″ | Nursery area | |||
| Rabka (R) | R1 | 19° 57′ 44.37″ | 49° 36′ 19.41″ | In urban park | 6: A, D, F, G, I, M | Mineral water/mountain climate, moderately and strongly incentives |
| R2 | 19° 57′ 24.36″ | 49° 36′ 37.60″ | Next to nursey | |||
| R3 | 19° 57′ 16.74″ | 49° 36′ 37.06″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| Krynica (K) | K1 | 20° 57′ 16.70″ | 49° 25′ 41.81″ | Next to block of flats | 8: B, C, F, H, I, N, O, P | Mineral water/subalpine climate, moderated by forest areas |
| K2 | 20° 55′ 50.80″ | 49° 24′ 37.39″ | On hotel area | |||
| K3 | 20° 56′ 45.53″ | 49° 24 01.57″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| Muszyna (M) | M1 | 20° 53′ 38.13″ | 49° 21′ 13.57″ | Private area, next to mail road | 4: C, F, H, K | Mineral water/piedmont climate, moderately and strongly incentives, moderated by forested mountain slopes |
| M2 | 20° 53′ 16.87″ | 49° 21′ 00.59″ | Recreation area, next to rope park | |||
| M3 | 20° 53′ 34.57″ | 49° 21′ 06.21″ | Private area, next to mail road | |||
| M4 | 20° 53′ 39.59″ | 49° 21′ 05.07″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| Piwniczna (P) | P1 | 20° 43′ 03.72″ | 49° 26′ 25.19″ | In urban park, next to river | 4: C, F, G, H | Mineral water/mountain climate, moderately and strongly incentives |
| P2 | 20° 42′ 37.94″ | 49° 26′ 29.64″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| P3 | 20° 42′ 41.77″ | 49° 26′ 28.81″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| P4 | 20° 42′ 50.88″ | 49° 26′ 23.84″ | Private area, next to mail road | |||
| Wysowa (W) | W1 | 21° 10′ 57.02″ | 49° 26′ 24.74″ | In urban park | 10: A, B, C, F, G, H, I, J, L, O | Mineral water/mountain climate, gentle incentives, moderated by forest areas (beech, spruce, fir) |
| W2 | 21° 10′ 49.05″ | 49° 26′ 20.85″ | In urban park | |||
| W3 | 21° 10′ 20.64″ | 49° 26′ 20.14″ | Next to block of flats | |||
| Swoszowice (SW) | SW1 | 19° 55′ 55.88″ | 49° 59′ 32.55″ | Next to block of flats | 5: A, B, C, L, M | Mineral water/lowland climate, moderately incentives, microclimate zone |
| SW2 | 19° 56′ 43.16″ | 49° 59′ 39.94″ | Next to nursey | |||
aTreatment of diseases: A orthopaedic trauma, B nervous system, C rheumatologic, D cardiology and hypertension, E peripheral vascular, F upper respiratory tract, G lower respiratory tract, H digestive system, I diabetes, J obesity, K endocrine, L osteoporosis, M skin, N feminine, O kidney and urinary tract, P blood and cardiovascular system, R eye and appendages of an eye
Total concentration of metals and metalloid in sand material (fraction <2 mm)
| Sampling site parameter | As | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/dm3) | |||||||||
| CRM | Certified value | 98 ± 5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 99 ± 5 |
| Measured value (TA) | 92.88 (94.8) | 9.53 (96.3) | 9.82 (99.2) | 10.16 (102.7) | 9.64 (97.2) | 10.16 (103.7) | 10.07 (101.7) | 102.6 (103.6) | |
| LOD | 0.0358 | 0.0013 | 0.0008 | 0.0039 | 0.0015 | 0.0064 | 0.0323 | 0.0473 | |
| LOQ | 0.1552 | 0.0055 | 0.0036 | 0.0139 | 0.0064 | 0.0216 | 0.1198 | 0.2053 | |
| Szczawnica (mg/kg) | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 1.05–1.94 | 0.036–0.039 | 0.67–0.81 | 1.04–4.35 | 1.52–181 | 2.71–3.47 | 0.75–2.29 | 8.13–15.96 | |
| Av. | 1.50 | 0.04 | 0.74 | 4.19 | 1.67 | 3.09 | 1.52 | 12.04 | |
| Rabka | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 1.22–3.09 | 0.05–0.13 | 0.21–0.84 | 2.40–4.43 | 1.04–1.64 | 1.46–3.67 | 1.44–1.81 | 10.07–13.95 | |
| Av. | 2.15 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 3.41 | 1.34 | 2.56 | 1.63 | 12.01 | |
| Krynica | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 1.35–1.62 | 0.05–0.18 | 0.49–1.39 | 3.28–5.13 | 1.15–2.01 | 2.04–5.08 | 1.25–4.31 | 10.78–18.67 | |
| Av. | 1.48 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 4.21 | 1.58 | 3.56 | 2.78 | 14.72 | |
| Muszyna | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 1.11–1.37 | 0.01–0.03 | 0.90–1.09 | 4.68–5.48 | 1.43–1.75 | 3.56–4.22 | 1.05–1.53 | 7.59–9.68 | |
| Av. | 1.24 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 5.08 | 1.59 | 3.89 | 1.29 | 8.63 | |
| Piwniczna | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 0.20–0.52 | 0.01–0.03 | 0.79–1.53 | 4.78–5.43 | 2.18–2.24 | 3.56–5.37 | 0.68–2.37 | 9.51–10.19 | |
| Av. | 0.36 | 0.02 | 1.16 | 5.11 | 2.21 | 4.47 | 1.52 | 9.85 | |
| Wysowa | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 0.77–1.05 | 0.01–0.06 | 0.73–1.59 | 4.26–6.02 | 1.45–1.98 | 3.30–5.07 | 0.86–2.35 | 7.71–13.58 | |
| Av. | 0.91 | 0.04 | 1.16 | 5.14 | 1.72 | 4.19 | 1.60 | 10.65 | |
| Swoszowice | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 1.52–3.60 | 0.11–0.13 | 0.57–0.61 | 3.25–3.29 | 0.56–0.73 | 2.29–2.37 | 2.52–5.50 | 15.20–37.92 | |
| Av. | 2.56 | 0.12 | 0.59 | 3.27 | 0.65 | 2.33 | 4.01 | 26.56 | |
| For all destination | |||||||||
| Min.–max. | 0.20–3.60 | 0.01–0.18 | 0.21–1.59 | 2.40–6.02 | 0.56–2.24 | 1.46–5.37 | 0.68–5.50 | 7.59–37.92 | |
| Av. ± SD | 1.46 ± 0.89 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | 0.87 ± 0.39 | 4.34 ± 0.98 | 1.54 ± 0.50 | 3.44 ± 1.16 | 2.05 ± 1.33 | 13.50 ± 7.51 | |
| Upper limit (% of samples above limit) | Aa | 20 (0%) | 1 (0%) | 20 (0%) | 50 (0%) | 30 (0%) | 35 (0%) | 50 (0%) | 100 (0%) |
| Ba | 20 (0%) | 4 (0%) | 20 (0%) | 150 (0%) | 150 (0%) | 100 (0%) | 100 (0%) | 300 (0%) | |
| DTb | 29 (0%) | 0.8 (0%) | 9 (0%) | 100 (0%) | 36 (0%) | 35 (0%) | 85 (0%) | 140 (0%) | |
| NCc | 20 (0%) | 10 (0%) | – | 5d (36%) | – | 135 (0%) | 100 (0%) | - | |
CRM Certified Ref. Material, AO analysis trueness (%), LOD limits of detection, LOQ limits of quantification, av. arithmetic average, SD standard deviation
aAccording to Minister (2002) A protecting areas, B other than protecting and industry areas
b DT Dutch Target and Intervention values for earth/sediment (Ministerie…2000, www.esdat.net2000)
c NC Norway quality criteria for soil day-care centres, playgrounds and schools (Alexander 2006)
dFor Cr6+
Fig. 2Images of the test material seen under an optical microscope. K sample please change "form" to "from" - 3 times Krynica, S sample from Szczawnica, SW sample from Swoszowice
Correlation coefficients (r ) calculated for the concentration of metals and metalloid in sands material (fraction <2 mm)
| Element | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As |
| −0.27* | −0.35*** | −0.59 |
| 0.15 | 0.12*** |
| Cd | – | −0.53* | −0.60*** | −0.64*** | −0.57*** |
|
|
| Co | – |
|
|
| −0.23** | −0.33*** | |
| Cr | – |
|
|
| −0.47*** | ||
| Cu | – |
| −0.51 | −0.55*** | |||
| Ni | – | −0.38 | −0.45*** | ||||
| Pb | – |
|
Bold values high correlation (0.5 ≤ r < 0.7), italic bold values indicate very high correlation (0.7 ≤ r < 0.9), and italic values indicate the correlation almost full (0.9 ≤ r < 1)
Differences between the content, statistically significant at *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001
Fig. 3Dendrogram for specified element content in sand samples from spas
Extraction of EDTA and 0.01 M CaC12 solution and water leaching of metal (as a % of total content from sand material) (fraction <2 mm)
| Sampling site/parameter | As | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (% of TC) | ||||||||||
| Szczawnica | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–0.20 | 0.2–30.2 | 0.5–5.6 | 4.7–5.4 | 6.1–8.2 | 2.8–4.0 | 0.01–0.3 | 4.5–5.0 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.19–0.21 | 8.7–31.0 | 0.1–5.5 | 0.3–5.7 | 0.4–8.4 | 0.2–4.4 | 13.0–25.9 | 0.7–5.9 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 58–100 | 41–90 | 4–10 | 0.4–0.5 | 7–20 | 3–5 | 13–26 | 6–13 | ||
| Rabka | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–0.01 | 0.2–2.4 | 2.9–13.4 | 2.4–4.1 | 4.4–12.1 | 1.2–1.4 | 0.9–3.4 | 5.2–11.8 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.08–0.11 | 4.5–16.9 | 1.2–15.9 | 0.02–4.2 | 0.7–12.7 | 0.3–1.9 | 29.9–78.4 | 0.6–12.4 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 40–99 | 36–43 | 7–29 | 1–2 | 8–19 | 4–9 | 30–78 | 21–31 | ||
| Krynica | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 5.1–5.5 | 0.1–7.3 | 3.1–3.3 | 1.7–3.4 | 6.5–7.0 | 1.0–2.3 | 0.1–0.2 | 1.3–3.7 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 5.1–5.1 | 1.9–7.1 | 0.2–3.4 | 0.2–3.3 | 0.1–7.5 | 0.2–2.3 | 7.4–22.4 | 0.6–3.9 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 69–89 | 15–73 | 6–7 | 0.6–0.7 | 20–23 | 2–4 | 7–22 | 7–8 | ||
| Muszyna | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–3.8 | 1.0–8.6 | 4.4–4.5 | 3.7–4.1 | 5.0–7.8 | 2.9–3.1 | 0.01–0.02 | 5.7–6.2 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.21–5.2 | 10.3–24.7 | 0.3–4.5 | 0.2–4.3 | 0.7–7.7 | 0.3–3.5 | 4.1–7.7 | 1.4–7.59 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 84–100 | 46–100 | 2–3 | 0.2–0.5 | 7–10 | 2.2–2.5 | 4–10 | 8–9 | ||
| Piwniczna | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–76.7 | 13.3–54.7 | 2.1–2.8 | 1.2–2.3 | 1.9–3.2 | 0.7–1.5 | 0.01–0.02 | 0.4–0.7 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.72–81.2 | 17.5–45. 9 | 0.3–3.4 | 0.1–2.2 | 0.5–3.5 | 0.3–1.7 | 0.3–15.8 | 0.6–1.4 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 100 | 69–100 | 3–5 | 0.5–0.6 | 5–11 | 2.4–2.6 | 13–16 | 8–14 | ||
| Wysowa | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–1.9 | 8.4–60.0 | 2.2–5.0 | 3.2–4.0 | 5.6–5.8 | 2.3–2.6 | 0.01–0.03 | 0.8–1.4 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.15–2.4 | 0.4–62. 9 | 0.6–5.8 | 0.1–4.2 | 0.70–6.8 | 0.1–2.4 | 1.5–2.1 | 0.5–0.5 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 100 | 44–100 | 4–7 | 0.2–0.5 | 8–9 | 2.7–2.9 | 4–14 | 6–7 | ||
| Swoszowice | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–0.02 | 0.2–1.5 | 6.0–6.5 | 2.0–3.9 | 11.3–11.9 | 1.5–3.2 | 1.7–3.8 | 3.5–7.3 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.08–0.16 | 0.8–1.9 | 0.2–7.8 | 0.1–4.1 | 2.1–12.2 | 0.1–4.1 | 0.1–4.3 | 0.7–7.4 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 28–78 | 33–45 | 9–16 | 0.7–0.8 | 33–38 | 4–8 | 23–32 | 12–14 | ||
| For all destination | ||||||||||
| Water leaching/min.–max. | 0.01–77 | 0.1–60.0 | 0.5–13.4 | 1.2–5.4 | 1.9–12.1 | 0.7–4.0 | 0.01–3.8 | 0.4–11.8 | ||
| 0.01 M CaCl2 extraction/min.–max. | 0.1–81.2 | 0.4–62.9 | 0.1–15.9 | 0.02–5.7 | 0.1–12.7 | 0.1–4.4 | 0.1–22.4 | 0.5–12.4 | ||
| EDTA extraction/min.–max. | 28–100 | 15–100 | 2–29 | 0.2–2 | 5–38 | 2–9 | 4–78 | 6–31 | ||
| Plants1 | (mg/kg) | Content in grass | 0.23-0.33 | 0.05–0.6 | 0.03–0.12 | 0.6–3 | 4–10 | 0.4–1.7 | 0.4–4.5 | 12–72 |
| Animals1 | Content in different land species | <1.5 | 0.1–1.5 | <0.5 | 0.02–1.5 | 1–20 | 1–3 | 0.2–2 | 10–200 | |
min. minimum, max. maximum, av. arithmetic average, “–” no data
1According Kabata-Pendias et al. (1999)
Hazard quotient and cancer risk calculated for 3- and 6-year-old children (residents and visitors) for each element and exposure route in health resort
| Element | RfD/SFa | Children | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-year-old residentb visitors | 6-year-old residentb visitors | ||||||||||||
| Ingestion | Inhalation | Dermal | HQing | HQinhal | HQdermal | ΣHQi | Risk | HQing | HQinhal | HQdermal | ΣHQi | Risk | |
| (mg/kg per day) | |||||||||||||
| As-non-cancer | 3.00E−04 | 1.23E−04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| As-cancer | 1.50E+00 | 1.51E+01 | 3.66E+00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Cd-non-cancer | 1.00E−03 | 1.00E−05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Cd-cancer | 6.30E+00 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Co-non-cancer | 2.00E−02 | 5.71E−06 | 1.60E−02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Co-cancer | 9.80E+00 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Cr-non-cancer | 3.00E−03 | 2.86E−05 | 6.00E−05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Cr-cancer | 4.20E+01 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Cu | 4.00E−02 | 1.20E−02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Ni-non-cancer | 2.00E−02 | 5.40E−03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Ni-cancer | 8.40E−01 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Pb | 3.50E−03 | 5.25E−04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Zn | 3.00E−01 | 6.00E−02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
aRfD (reference dose) and SF (slope factor) for all elements according to US EPA IRIS (2005) and for Pb according to WHO (1993)
bItalics: for residents accepted EF = 646 h/year, for visitors EF = 84 h/year
Comparison of the result of this study with those of other contents of metals in sand and soil studies
| Material | Site | Methods | As | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | Range | Av. | |||
| (mg/kg) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Sand | Kraków | HNO3 + HClO3
| − | − | 0.00–0.30 | 0.08 | − | − | 1.0–13.75 | 2.28 | 0.65–4.95 | 1.27 | 0.73–6.98 | 1.72 | 1.83–46.75 | 13.7 | 7.10–210 | 66.24 |
| Bytom | − | − | − | <0.11–0.69 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | <0.46–19.24 | − | 6.12–81.35 | − | |
| Silesia, Polandc | HNO3 + HCl | 0.1–0.65 | 0.28 | 1–3 | 2 | 5–14 | 9.8 | − | − | 0.4–4 | 1.1 | 4–9 | 6.8 | 25–40 | 31 | 7–285 | 57 | |
| this study | HNO3 + HCl | 0.2–3.6 | 1.46 | 0.01–0.18 | 0.06 | 0.21–1.59 | 0.87 | 2.40–6.02 | 4.34 | 0.56–2.24 | 1.54 | 1.46–5.37 | 3.44 | 0.68–5.50 | 2.05 | 7.59–37.92 | 13.50 | |
| Sandy substrate | Madrid, Spaind | HNO3 + HCl | 3.7–14 | 6.9 | 0.05–0.3 | 0.14 | 1.5–5.8 | 3.2 | 4.1–51 | 17 | 5.4–39 | 14 | 2–14 | 5.7 | 6.1–65 | 22 | 20–103 | 50 |
| Soil | Silesia | HNO3 + HCl | 2.3–6.1 | 3.7 | 3–12 | 7.4 | 7–19 | 11 | − | − | 5–45 | 31 | 7–40 | 16.5 | 65–789 | 247 | 27–365 | 166 |
| Poznan | 6 M HCl | − | − | 0.22–7.16 | − | − | − | − | − | 1.1–124.5 | − | − | − | 2.5–95.9 | − | 6.1–225.5 | − | |
| Owerri, Nigeriaf | 4 N HNO3 | − | − | 0.31–1.45 | 0.76 | 0.69–13.21 | 4.76 | 3.9–27.2 | 12.80 | 11.6–76.8 | 26.56 | 2.2–61.53 | 20.31 | 4.55–7.19 | 6.0 | 32.34–168.7 | 62.34 | |
| Istanbul, Turkeyg | HNO3 + HCl + HF | − | − | 1.21–2.07 | − | 0.18–36.87 | 16.94 | 1.1–102 | 61.68 | 3.18–57.7 | 25.79 | 1.12–59.5 | 31.48 | 18.26–73.20 | 33.9 | 81.6–242.4 | 154.24 | |
| Sao Paulo | INAA | 1.3–24 | − | − | − | − | − | 21–70 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 15–179 | − | |
av. average, “–” no data
aJasiewicz et al. (2009)
bNieć et al. (2013)
cKicińska (2016a, 2016b)
dDe Miguel et al. (2007); data for 2003 year
eDiatta and Grzebisz (2011)
fVerla et al. (2015)
gNamik et al. (2012)
hFigueiredo et al. (2011), INNA Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis