| Literature DB >> 28684964 |
Wei Yu1, Huirong Sun2, Wenliang Zha3, Weili Cui1, Ling Xu1, Qing Min1, Jiliang Wu1.
Abstract
Treatment with Adriamycin (ADR) is one of the major causes of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and therefore is the principal limiting factor in the effectiveness of chemotherapy for cancer patients. Apigenin (API) has been shown to play a cardioprotective role. The present study examined the effect of API on ADR-induced cardiotoxicity in mice. Sixty male Kunming mice were randomly divided into 4 groups: a control group, ADR model group, low-dose API treatment group (125 mg·kg-1), and high-dose API treatment group (250 mg·kg-1). Blood samples were taken to evaluate a spectrum of myocardial enzymes. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was measured using a TUNEL assay, and cardiomyocyte autophagy was observed using electron microscopy. Moreover, apoptosis-related proteins, such as Bax and Bcl-2, autophagy-related proteins, including Beclin1 and LC3B, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway-related proteins were examined with western blot. Our results demonstrate that ADR caused an increase in the serum levels of cardiac injury markers and enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and autophagy. API administration prevented the effects associated with ADR-induced cardiotoxicity in mice and inhibited ADR-induced apoptosis and autophagy. API also promoted PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activity in ADR-treated mice. In conclusion, API may have a protective effect against ADR-induced cardiotoxicity by inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy via activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28684964 PMCID: PMC5480054 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2590676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Apigenin alleviated ADR-induced myocardial injury. (a) Apigenin inhibited serum AST release. (b) Apigenin reduced serum LDH release. (c) Apigenin reduced serum CK contents. AST: aspartate amino transferase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; CK: creatine kinase-MB; control: control group; ADR: ADR model group (24 mg/kg); ADR + API (L): low-dose apigenin treatment group (125 mg/kg); ADR + API (H): high-dose apigenin treatment group (250 mg/kg); n = 10 per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 compared with the control group; #P < 0.05 compared with the ADR model group.
Figure 2Effect of apigenin on apoptosis and related protein expression in hearts from ADR-treated mice. (a) Representative pictures of TUNEL assay results (magnification: 400x) and TUNEL apoptotic index were determined by calculating the ratio of TUNEL-positive cells to total cells. Arrows indicate positive cells; n = 3 per group. (b) Representative pictures of Bcl-2 and Bax expression; n = 5 per group. (c) Quantitative analysis of Bax/Bcl-2 ratios; n = 5 per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 compared with the control group; #P < 0.05 compared with the ADR model group.
Figure 3Effect of apigenin on autophagy and related protein expression in hearts from ADR-treated mice. (a) Representative transmission electron micrographs of left ventricular specimens. Arrows indicate autophagic vacuoles; n = 3 per group. (b) Representative pictures of Beclin1 and LC3B expression; n = 5 per group. GAPDH served as the loading control. (c) Quantitative analysis of LC3BII/LC3B I ratios; GAPDH served as the loading control; n = 5 per group. (d) Beclin1 expression levels were quantified via densitometry and normalized to the expression of GAPDH, which was used as a loading control; n = 5 per group. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 compared with the control group; #P < 0.05 compared with the ADR model group.
Figure 4Effect of apigenin on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in hearts from ADR-treated mice. (a) Representative pictures of PI3K-p85, p-AKT, AKT, p-mTOR, and mTOR expression. GAPDH served as the loading control; n = 5 per group. (b) Quantitative analysis of the PI3K-p85/GAPDH ratio; expression levels were quantified via densitometry and normalized to the expression of GAPDH, which was used as a loading control; n = 5 per group. (c) Quantitative analysis of the p-AKT/AKT ratio; GAPDH served as the loading control; n = 5 per group. (d) Quantitative analysis of the p-mTOR/mTOR ratio; n = 5 per group. GAPDH served as the loading control. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 compared with the control group; #P < 0.05 compared with the ADR model group.