| Literature DB >> 28684886 |
Can Liu1, Nan Zhou1, Jieying Li2, Jun Kong3, Xi Guan3, Xudong Wang3.
Abstract
Eg5 (kinesin spindle protein) plays an essential role in mitosis. Inhibition of Eg5 function results in cell cycle arrest at mitosis, which leads to cell death. To date, Eg5 expression and its prognostic significance have not been studied in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, 26 freshly frozen HCC tissue samples and matched peritumoral tissue samples were evaluated with a one-step qPCR test and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was conducted on 156 HCC samples to investigate the relationships among Eg5 expression, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis. Eg5 mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly higher in HCC tissues relative to matched noncancerous tissues (p < 0.05). High Eg5 protein expression was significantly related to liver cirrhosis (p = 0.038) and TNM stage (p = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses revealed that Eg5 overexpression (p = 0.001), liver cirrhosis (p = 0.009), and TNM stage (p = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. These findings indicate that Eg5 expression can be used as a biomarker of poor prognosis and as a novel therapeutic target for HCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28684886 PMCID: PMC5480051 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2176460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1Eg5 mRNA expression in HCC and normal tissues. (a) One-step qPCR was performed to compare Eg5 mRNA expression levels in cancerous tissues with those in adjacent normal tissues. The Eg5 mRNA level in the HCC tissue (1.976 ± 0.02068) was higher on average than that in the matched adjacent tissue. β-Actin was used as an internal control. (b) In TCGA dataset, the Eg5 mRNA level in the carcinoma tissue was higher on average than that in the matched normal tissue (p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for Eg5 expression in cancerous and peritumoral tissues. (a, b) Positive cytoplasmic IHC staining (red arrow) for Eg5 in HCC tissue samples. (c, d) Negative IHC staining (green arrow) for Eg5 in normal tissue samples (original magnification: ×40 in (a) and (c); ×400 in (b) and (d)).
Eg5 IHC staining in benign, cancerous, and adjacent liver tissues.
| Tissue sample |
| Eg5 expression, | Pearson |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low or none | Positive | ||||
| Liver tissue with benign disease | 74 | 39 (52.70) | 35 (47.30) | 14.738 | 0.001∗ |
| Adjacent liver tissue | 69 | 39 (56.52) | 30 (43.48) | ||
| Liver cancer | 156 | 51 (32.69) | 105 (67.31) | ||
∗ p < 0.05.
Patient clinicopathological characteristics according to the Eg5 score.
| Characteristic |
| Eg5 expression, | Pearson |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | ||||
| Total | 156 | 51 (32.69) | 105 (67.31) | ||
| Gender | 0.132 | 0.717 | |||
| Male | 119 | 38 (31.93) | 81 (68.07) | ||
| Female | 37 | 13 (35.14) | 24 (64.86) | ||
| Age | 1.867 | 0.172 | |||
| <60 | 109 | 39 (35.78) | 70 (64.22) | ||
| ≥60 | 45 | 11 (24.44) | 34 (75.56) | ||
| Unknown | 2 | ||||
| Differentiation | 2.092 | 0.351 | |||
| Well | 12 | 6 (50.00) | 6 (50.00) | ||
| Middle | 113 | 34 (30.09) | 79 (69.91) | ||
| Poor | 31 | 11 (35.48) | 20 (64.52) | ||
| Liver cirrhosis | 4.298 | 0.038∗ | |||
| Yes | 99 | 26 (26.26) | 73 (73.74) | ||
| No | 46 | 20 (43.48) | 26 (56.52) | ||
| Unknown | 11 | ||||
| Gross classification | 0.093 | 0.760 | |||
| Solitary | 139 | 46 (33.09) | 93 (66.91) | ||
| Multiple | 17 | 5 (29.41) | 12 (70.59) | ||
| Hepatitis B viral infection | 1.115 | 0.291 | |||
| Yes | 12 | 2 (16.67) | 10 (83.33) | ||
| No | 128 | 39 (30.47) | 89 (69.53) | ||
| Unknown | 16 | ||||
| Vascular invasion | 2.121 | 0.145 | |||
| Yes | 68 | 18 (26.47) | 50 (73.53) | ||
| No | 88 | 33 (37.50) | 55 (62.50) | ||
| Tumor diameter | 1.974 | 0.160 | |||
| <5 cm | 93 | 35 (37.63) | 58 (62.37) | ||
| ≥5 cm | 60 | 16 (26.67) | 44 (73.33) | ||
| Unknown | 3 | ||||
| TNM stage | 9.710 | 0.008∗ | |||
| I | 79 | 30 (37.97) | 49 (62.03) | ||
| II | 66 | 21 (31.82) | 45 (68.18) | ||
| III | 11 | 0 (0.00) | 11 (100.00) | ||
|
| 0.959 | 0.327 | |||
| <20 | 51 | 13 (25.49) | 38 (74.51) | ||
| ≥20 | 68 | 23 (33.82) | 45 (66.18) | ||
| Unknown | 37 | ||||
∗ p < 0.05.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival in liver cancer patients.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR |
| 95% CI | HR |
| 95% CI | |||
| Eg5 expression | ||||||||
| High versus low | 4.490 | <0.001∗ | 2.511 | 8.030 | 3.913 | <0.001∗ | 2.136 | 7.167 |
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| ≤60 versus >60 | 0.983 | 0.949 | 0.589 | 1.643 | ||||
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male versus female | 0755 | 0.260 | 0.463 | 1.323 | ||||
| Liver cirrhosis | ||||||||
| Yes versus no | 2.396 | 0.003∗ | 1.339 | 4.286 | 2.169 | 0.009∗ | 1.210 | 3.889 |
| Gross classification | ||||||||
| Solitary versus multiple | 2.292 | 0.007∗ | 1.254 | 4.188 | ||||
| Differentiation | ||||||||
| Well versus middle versus poor | 1.217 | 0.353 | 0.804 | 1.843 | ||||
| Hepatitis B viral infection | ||||||||
| Yes versus no | 1.489 | 0.438 | 0.544 | 4.072 | ||||
| Vascular invasion | ||||||||
| Yes versus no | 1.132 | 0.582 | 0.728 | 1.761 | ||||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||||||
| <5 versus ≥5 | 1.287 | 0.277 | 0.816 | 2.029 | ||||
| TNM stage | ||||||||
| I versus II versus III | 1.604 | 0.011∗ | 1.112 | 2.313 | 1.524 | 0.025∗ | 1.053 | 2.206 |
| Preoperative | ||||||||
| <20 versus ≥20 | 0.900 | 0.658 | 0.564 | 1.436 | ||||
∗ p < 0.05; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves of HCC patients after surgical therapy. (a) Patients with high Eg5 expression levels (red line) exhibited lower overall survival rates than patients with low Eg5 expression levels (blue line). (b) Patients at an advanced TNM stage (stages III-IV) (green line) exhibited a statistically lower overall survival rate than those at an early TNM stage. (c) Patients with liver cirrhosis (blue line) exhibited poor prognoses compared with patients without liver cirrhosis. (d) In TCGA dataset, patients with high Eg5 expression levels (red line) exhibited lower overall survival rates than patients with low Eg5 expression levels (blue line).