Literature DB >> 28684832

A retrospective audit of the outcome of composites used to restore worn teeth.

D Bartlett1, S Varma1.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this audit was to monitor the outcome of composite restorations placed at an increased vertical dimension in patients with severe tooth wear.Methods This convenience sample of patients were treated by 11 specialist trainees in prosthodontics, and restored with direct composites. Exclusion criteria included bruxism, poor medical health and a preference for monitoring rather than intervention. The restorations were placed between 2012 and 2016 and were placed over more than one appointment and the outcome monitored for up to 14 months. Failure was assessed at a binary level, either success or failure (minor or major).Results A total of 35 patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 24-86), 27 of whom were male, received 251 restorations placed from November 2012 to November 2016. The patients had a mean of 11.51 (range 4 to 16) occluding pairs of teeth. There was a total of 40 restoration failures (17%) which was an 83% success rate based on the total number of restorations. For the patient-based data, 14 patients (39%) had no chips or bulk factures while 22 (61%) patients had failures, of which 60% were chips and 40% bulk fractures.Conclusion Restoration of worn teeth with composites is associated with a high incidence of fractures.Clinical significance The restoration of worn teeth with composite can involve regular maintenance following fractures and patients need to be aware of this when giving consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28684832     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  9 in total

1.  Erosion and tooth surface loss.

Authors:  David W Bartlett
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study.

Authors:  A Milosevic; G Burnside
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months.

Authors:  K W Hemmings; U R Darbar; S Vaughan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 4.  Prevalence of tooth wear in adults.

Authors:  Arie Van't Spijker; Jose M Rodriguez; Cees M Kreulen; Ewald M Bronkhorst; David W Bartlett; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 5.  Tooth wear: a systematic review of treatment options.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Muts; Hans van Pelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Ivo Krejci; Marco Cune
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).

Authors:  A B Gulamali; K W Hemmings; C J Tredwin; A Petrie
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors.

Authors:  B G Smith; J K Knight
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1984-07-07       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; A Lussi; N X West; P Bouchard; M Sanz; D Bourgeois
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs.

Authors:  D Bartlett; C Ganss; A Lussi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  The treatment need and associated cost of erosive tooth wear rehabilitation - a service evaluation within an NHS dental hospital.

Authors:  S O'Toole; M Pennington; S Varma; D W Bartlett
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  The management of tooth wear with crowns and indirect restorations.

Authors:  S Varma; A Preiskel; D Bartlett
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  The restorative management of tooth wear involving the aesthetic zone.

Authors:  S B Mehta; S Banerji
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Clinical guidance and an evidence-based approach for restoration of worn dentition by direct composite resin.

Authors:  A Milosevic
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  A guide to managing tooth wear: the Radboud philosophy.

Authors:  B Loomans; N Opdam
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Deterioration of anterior resin composite restorations in moderate to severe tooth wear patients: 3-year results.

Authors:  Verônica P Lima; Luuk A M J Crins; Niek J M Opdam; Rafael R Moraes; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans; Bas A C Loomans
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Two-body wear behavior of human enamel versus monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, ceramometal and composite resin.

Authors:  Syed Rashid Habib; Abdulaziz Alotaibi; Nawaf Al Hazza; Yasser Allam; Mohammad AlGhazi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  The Effect of Simulated Chewing on the Surface Roughness of Direct and Indirect Resin-Composites Opposed by Zirconia: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Ghadeer S AlSuwaidi; Ruwaida Z Alshali; Nesreen A Salim; Julian D Satterthwaite; Nick Silikas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 9.  Direct Composite Resin for the Management of Tooth Wear: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Disha Vajani; Tameeza Hassanali Tejani; Alexander Milosevic
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-11-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.