Literature DB >> 28684463

Individual variation in metabolic reaction norms over ambient temperature causes low correlation between basal and standard metabolic rate.

Michael Briga1, Simon Verhulst2.   

Abstract

Basal metabolic rate (BMR) is often assumed to be indicative of the energy turnover at ambient temperatures (Ta) below the thermoneutral zone (SMR), but this assumption has remained largely untested. Using a new statistical approach, we quantified the consistency in nocturnal metabolic rate across a temperature range in zebra finches (N=3213 measurements on 407 individuals) living permanently in eight outdoor aviaries. Foraging conditions were either benign or harsh, and body mass and mass-adjusted BMR (BMRm) and SMR (SMRm) were lower in individuals living in a harsh foraging environment. The correlation between SMRm at different Ta was high (r=0.91), independent of foraging environment, showing that individuals are consistently ranked according to their SMRm However, the correlations between BMRm and SMRm were always lower (average: r=0.29; range: 0<r<0.50), in particular in the benign foraging environment. Variation in metabolic response to lower Ta at least in part reflected differential body temperature (Tb) regulation: early morning Tb was lower at low Ta, and more so in individuals with a weaker metabolic response to lower Ta Our findings have implications for the use of BMR in the estimation of time-energy budgets and comparative analyses: we suggest that the use of metabolic rates at ecologically relevant Ta, such as the easily tractable SMR, will be more informative than the use of BMR as a proxy for energy turnover.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMR; Body temperature; Daily energy expenditure; Foraging; Repeatability; SMR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28684463     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.160069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Baseline glucose level is an individual trait that is negatively associated with lifespan and increases due to adverse environmental conditions during development and adulthood.

Authors:  Bibiana Montoya; Michael Briga; Blanca Jimeno; Sander Moonen; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Food supply and individual quality influence seabird energy expenditure and reproductive success.

Authors:  Shirel R Kahane-Rapport; Shannon Whelan; Justine Ammendolia; Scott A Hatch; Kyle H Elliott; Shoshanah Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Corticosterone levels reflect variation in metabolic rate, independent of 'stress'.

Authors:  Blanca Jimeno; Michaela Hau; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Total energy expenditure is repeatable in adults but not associated with short-term changes in body composition.

Authors:  Rebecca Rimbach; John R Speakman; Herman Pontzer; Yosuke Yamada; Hiroyuki Sagayama; Philip N Ainslie; Lene F Anderson; Liam J Anderson; Lenore Arab; Issaad Baddou; Kweku Bedu-Addo; Ellen E Blaak; Stephane Blanc; Alberto G Bonomi; Carlijn V C Bouten; Pascal Bovet; Maciej S Buchowski; Nancy F Butte; Stefan G J A Camps; Graeme L Close; Jamie A Cooper; Sai Krupa Das; Lara R Dugas; Ulf Ekelund; Sonja Entringer; Terrence Forrester; Barry W Fudge; Annelies H Goris; Michael Gurven; Catherine Hambly; Asmaa El Hamdouchi; Marije B Hoos; Sumei Hu; Noorjehan Joonas; Annemiek M Joosen; Peter Katzmarzyk; Kitty P Kempen; Misaka Kimura; William E Kraus; Robert F Kushner; Estelle V Lambert; William R Leonard; Nader Lessan; Corby K Martin; Anine C Medin; Erwin P Meijer; James C Morehen; James P Morton; Marian L Neuhouser; Theresa A Nicklas; Robert M Ojiambo; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Yannis P Pitsiladis; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Guy Plasqui; Ross L Prentice; Roberto A Rabinovich; Susan B Racette; David A Raichlen; Eric Ravussin; Rebecca M Reynolds; Susan B Roberts; Albertine J Schuit; Anders M Sjödin; Eric Stice; Samuel S Urlacher; Giulio Valenti; Ludo M Van Etten; Edgar A Van Mil; Jonathan C K Wells; George Wilson; Brian M Wood; Jack Yanovski; Tsukasa Yoshida; Xueying Zhang; Alexia J Murphy-Alford; Cornelia U Loechl; Amy H Luke; Jennifer Rood; Dale A Schoeller; Klaas R Westerterp; William W Wong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Experimentally manipulated food availability affects offspring quality but not quantity in zebra finch meso-populations.

Authors:  Yoran H Gerritsma; Merijn M G Driessen; Marianthi Tangili; Sietse F de Boer; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.