| Literature DB >> 28684399 |
Mehdi Saadaoui1, Daijiro Konno2, Karine Loulier3, Rosette Goiame4, Vaibhav Jadhav5, Marina Mapelli5, Fumio Matsuzaki2, Xavier Morin1.
Abstract
In many cell types, mitotic spindle orientation relies on the canonical "LGN complex" composed of Pins/LGN, Mud/NuMA, and Gαi subunits. Membrane localization of this complex recruits motor force generators that pull on astral microtubules to orient the spindle. Drosophila Pins shares highly conserved functional domains with its two vertebrate homologs LGN and AGS3. Whereas the role of Pins and LGN in oriented divisions is extensively documented, involvement of AGS3 remains controversial. Here, we show that AGS3 is not required for planar divisions of neural progenitors in the mouse neocortex. AGS3 is not recruited to the cell cortex and does not rescue LGN loss of function. Despite conserved interactions with NuMA and Gαiin vitro, comparison of LGN and AGS3 functional domains in vivo reveals unexpected differences in the ability of these interactions to mediate spindle orientation functions. Finally, we find that Drosophila Pins is unable to substitute for LGN loss of function in vertebrates, highlighting that species-specific modulations of the interactions between components of the Pins/LGN complex are crucial in vivo for spindle orientation.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990LGNzzm321990; AGS3; Pins; spindle orientation; vertebrate neuroepithelium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28684399 PMCID: PMC5579374 DOI: 10.15252/embr.201643048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBO Rep ISSN: 1469-221X Impact factor: 8.807