Literature DB >> 28684302

Assessment of obstructive sleep apnoea treatment success or failure after maxillomandibular advancement.

M H T de Ruiter1, R C Apperloo2, D M J Milstein2, J de Lange2.   

Abstract

Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is an alternative therapeutic option that is highly effective for treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). MMA provides a solution for OSA patients that have difficulty accepting lifelong treatments with continuous positive airway pressure or mandibular advancement devices. The goal of this study was to investigate the different characteristics that determine OSA treatment success/failure after MMA. The apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) was used to determine the success or failure of OSA treatment after MMA. Sixty-two patients underwent MMA for moderate and severe OSA. A 71% success rate was observed with a mean AHI reduction of 69%. A statistically significant larger neck circumference was measured in patients with failed OSA treatments following MMA (P=0.008), and older patients had failed OSA treatments with MMA: 58 vs. 53 years respectively (P=0.037). Cephalometric analysis revealed no differences between successful and failed OSA treatment outcomes. There was no difference in maxillary and mandibular advancements between success and failed MMA-treated OSA patients. The complications most frequently reported following MMA were sensory disturbances in the inferior alveolar nerve (60%) and malocclusion (24%). The results suggest that age and neck girth may be important factors that could predict susceptibility to OSA treatment failures by MMA.
Copyright © 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OSA; complication; maxillomandibular advancement; obstructive sleep apnoea

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28684302     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  The influence of position dependency on surgical success in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing maxillomandibular advancement.

Authors:  Patty E Vonk; Perry J Rotteveel; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Jean-Pierre T F Ho; Jan de Lange; Nico de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Noncontact identification of sleep-disturbed breathing from smartphone-recorded sounds validated by polysomnography.

Authors:  Sanjiv Narayan; Priyanka Shivdare; Tharun Niranjan; Kathryn Williams; Jon Freudman; Ruchir Sehra
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a tool for selecting patients with obstructive sleep apnea for maxillomandibular advancement.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Jean-Pierre T F Ho; Nico de Vries; Pien F N Bosschieter; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Jan de Lange
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  A stepwise titration protocol for oral appliance therapy in positional obstructive sleep apnea patients: proof of concept.

Authors:  M H T de Ruiter; G Aarab; N de Vries; F Lobbezoo; J de Lange
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Impact of surgical maxillomandibular advancement upon pharyngeal airway volume and the apnoea-hypopnoea index in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Giralt-Hernando; Adaia Valls-Ontañón; Raquel Guijarro-Martínez; Jorge Masià-Gridilla; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 6.  Why most patients do not exhibit obstructive sleep apnea after mandibular setback surgery?

Authors:  Jin-Wook Kim; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.