Alessandro Cannavo1, Giuseppe Rengo2, Daniela Liccardo1, Andres Pun3, Ehre Gao1, Alvin J George1, Giuseppina Gambino4, Antonio Rapacciuolo5, Dario Leosco4, Borja Ibanez6, Nicola Ferrara7, Nazareno Paolocci8, Walter J Koch9. 1. Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA Società Benefit, Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme (BN), Italy. Electronic address: giuseppe.rengo@unina.it. 3. Myocardial Pathophysiology Area, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 5. Department of Advanced Medical Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 6. Myocardial Pathophysiology Area, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madid, Spain; CIBER de enfermedades cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain. 7. Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA Società Benefit, Telese Terme Institute, Telese Terme (BN), Italy. 8. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 9. Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: walter.koch@temple.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although β-blockers increase survival in patients with heart failure (HF), the mechanisms behind this protection are not fully understood, and not all patients with HF respond favorably to them. We recently showed that, in cardiomyocytes, a reciprocal down-regulation occurs between β1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) and the cardioprotective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor-1 (S1PR1). OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that, in addition to salutary actions due to direct β1AR-blockade, agents such as metoprolol (Meto) may improve post-myocardial infarction (MI) structural and functional outcomes via restored S1PR1 signaling, and sought to determine mechanisms accounting for this effect. METHODS: We tested the in vitro effects of Meto in HEK293 cells and in ventricular cardiomyocytes isolated from neonatal rats. In vivo, we assessed the effects of Meto in MI wild-type and β3AR knockout mice. RESULTS: Here we report that, in vitro, Meto prevents catecholamine-induced down-regulation of S1PR1, a major cardiac protective signaling pathway. In vivo, we show that Meto arrests post-MI HF progression in mice as much as chronic S1P treatment. Importantly, human HF subjects receiving β1AR-blockers display elevated circulating S1P levels, confirming that Meto promotes S1P secretion/signaling. Mechanistically, we found that Meto-induced S1P secretion is β3AR-dependent because Meto infusion in β3AR knockout mice does not elevate circulating S1P levels, nor does it ameliorate post-MI dysfunction, as in wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uncovers a previously unrecognized mechanism by which β1-blockers prevent HF progression in patients with ischemia, suggesting that β3AR dysfunction may account for limited/null efficacy in β1AR-blocker-insensitive HF subjects.
BACKGROUND: Although β-blockers increase survival in patients with heart failure (HF), the mechanisms behind this protection are not fully understood, and not all patients with HF respond favorably to them. We recently showed that, in cardiomyocytes, a reciprocal down-regulation occurs between β1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) and the cardioprotective sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor-1 (S1PR1). OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that, in addition to salutary actions due to direct β1AR-blockade, agents such as metoprolol (Meto) may improve post-myocardial infarction (MI) structural and functional outcomes via restored S1PR1 signaling, and sought to determine mechanisms accounting for this effect. METHODS: We tested the in vitro effects of Meto in HEK293 cells and in ventricular cardiomyocytes isolated from neonatal rats. In vivo, we assessed the effects of Meto in MI wild-type and β3AR knockout mice. RESULTS: Here we report that, in vitro, Meto prevents catecholamine-induced down-regulation of S1PR1, a major cardiac protective signaling pathway. In vivo, we show that Meto arrests post-MI HF progression in mice as much as chronic S1P treatment. Importantly, human HF subjects receiving β1AR-blockers display elevated circulating S1P levels, confirming that Meto promotes S1P secretion/signaling. Mechanistically, we found that Meto-induced S1P secretion is β3AR-dependent because Meto infusion in β3AR knockout mice does not elevate circulating S1P levels, nor does it ameliorate post-MI dysfunction, as in wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uncovers a previously unrecognized mechanism by which β1-blockers prevent HF progression in patients with ischemia, suggesting that β3AR dysfunction may account for limited/null efficacy in β1AR-blocker-insensitive HF subjects.
Authors: Zhu-Qiu Jin; Hui-Zhong Zhou; Peili Zhu; Norman Honbo; Daria Mochly-Rosen; Robert O Messing; Edward J Goetzl; Joel S Karliner; Mary O Gray Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alessandro Cannavo; Giuseppe Rengo; Daniela Liccardo; Gianluigi Pironti; Maria Cecilia Scimia; Laura Scudiero; Claudio De Lucia; Marco Ferrone; Dario Leosco; Nicola Zambrano; Walter J Koch; Bruno Trimarco; Giovanni Esposito Journal: Apoptosis Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Jianqing Zhang; Norman Honbo; Edward J Goetzl; Kanu Chatterjee; Joel S Karliner; Mary O Gray Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Che-Chung Yeh; Hongzhe Li; Deepak Malhotra; Mei-Chuan Huang; Bo-Qing Zhu; Edward J Goetzl; Donald A Vessey; Joel S Karliner; Michael J Mann Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Danielle M Trappanese; Yuchuan Liu; Ryan C McCormick; Alessandro Cannavo; Gayani Nanayakkara; Marina M Baskharoun; Harish Jarrett; Felix J Woitek; D Michael Tillson; A Ray Dillon; Fabio A Recchia; Jean-Luc Balligand; Steven R Houser; Walter J Koch; Louis J Dell'Italia; Emily J Tsai Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: M R Bristow; R Ginsburg; W Minobe; R S Cubicciotti; W S Sageman; K Lurie; M E Billingham; D C Harrison; E B Stinson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1982-07-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jaime García-Prieto; Jose Manuel García-Ruiz; David Sanz-Rosa; Andrés Pun; Ana García-Alvarez; Sean M Davidson; Leticia Fernández-Friera; Mario Nuno-Ayala; Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Juan A Bernal; José Luis Izquierdo-Garcia; Jesús Jimenez-Borreguero; Gonzalo Pizarro; Jesús Ruiz-Cabello; Carlos Macaya; Valentín Fuster; Derek M Yellon; Borja Ibanez Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Wenliang Zhang; Emilio P Mottillo; Jiawei Zhao; Allison Gartung; Garrett C VanHecke; Jen-Fu Lee; Krishna R Maddipati; Haiyan Xu; Young-Hoon Ahn; Richard L Proia; James G Granneman; Menq-Jer Lee Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 5.486