Literature DB >> 28682966

Management of Low Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in the Laparoscopic Era: More Than a Decade of Experience.

Stephen Alexander Boyce1, Craig Harris, Andrew Stevenson, John Lumley, David Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery increases postoperative mortality, cancer recurrence, permanent stoma formation, and poor bowel function. Anastomosis between the colon and rectum is a particularly high risk. Traditional management mandates laparotomy, disassembly of the anastomosis, and formation of an often-permanent stoma. After laparoscopic colorectal surgery it may be possible to manage anastomotic failure with laparoscopy, thus avoiding laparotomy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the laparoscopic management of failed low colorectal anastomoses.
SETTING: This was a single-institute case series. PATIENTS: A total of 555 laparoscopic patients undergoing anterior resection with primary anastomosis within 10 cm of the anus in the period 2000-2012 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anastomotic failure, defined as any clinical or radiological demonstrable defect in the anastomosis; complications using the Clavien-Dindo system; mortality within 30 days; and patient demographics and risk factors, as defined by the Charlson index, were measured.
RESULTS: Leakage occurred in 44 (7.9%) of 555 patients, 16 patients with a diverting ileostomy and 28 with no diverting ileostomy. Leakage was more common in those with anastomoses <5 cm form the anus, male patients, and those with a colonic J-pouch and rectal cancer. Diverting ileostomy was not protective of anastomotic leakage. In those patients with anastomotic leakage and a primary diverting ileostomy, recourse to the peritoneal cavity was required in 4 of 16 patients versus 24 of 28 without a diverting ileostomy (p = 0.0002). In 74% of those cases, access to the peritoneal cavity was achieved through laparoscopy. Permanent stoma rates were very low, including 14 (2.5%) of 555 total patients or 8 (18.0%) of 44 patients with anastomotic leakage. Thirty-day mortality was rare (0.6%). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the lack of a cohort of open cases for comparison.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anterior resection is associated with low levels of complications, including anastomotic leak, postoperative mortality, and permanent stoma formation. Anastomotic leakage can be managed with laparoscopy in the majority of cases. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A353.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28682966     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sohyun Kim; Sang Hun Jung; Jae Hwang Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Redo-laparoscopy in the management of complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  P Fransvea; G Costa; L D'Agostino; G Sganga; A Serao
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Operative Management of Anastomotic Leaks after Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Nicole M Saur; E Carter Paulson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

4.  Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hoffman; Hadassah Consuegra; Kevin Long; Christopher Buzas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Is routine splenic flexure mobilization always necessary in laparotomic or laparoscopic anterior rectal resection? A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Rondelli; Alessandro Pasculli; Michele De Rosa; Stefano Avenia; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-07-24

6.  Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for late low colorectal anastomosis ischaemia: Case report.

Authors:  Marcello Sanzi; Alberto Aiolfi; Jacopo Nicolò Marin; Abd El Hakim Darawsh; Davide Bona
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

7.  Treatment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: The TENTACLE-Rectum study.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Kevin Talboom; Gerjon Hannink; Albert Wolthuis; Borja F de Lacy; Jeremie H Lefevre; Michael Solomon; Matteo Frasson; Nicolas Rotholtz; Quentin Denost; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yves Panis; Camiel Rosman; Roel Hompes; Pieter J Tanis; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Surgical specimen extraction via a prophylactic ileostomy procedure: A minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Jian-Wei Liang; Hai-Tao Zhou; Zheng Wang; Zhi-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Risk factors of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and its impacts on a long-term survival after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Xinyu Qi; Maoxing Liu; Kai Xu; Pin Gao; Fei Tan; Zhendan Yao; Nan Zhang; Hong Yang; Chenghai Zhang; Jiadi Xing; Ming Cui; Xiangqian Su
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Male sex and history of ischemic heart disease are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seiichi Shinji; Yoshibumi Ueda; Takeshi Yamada; Michihiro Koizumi; Yasuyuki Yokoyama; Goro Takahashi; Masahiro Hotta; Takuma Iwai; Keisuke Hara; Kohki Takeda; Mikihiro Okusa; Hayato Kan; Eiji Uchida; Hiroshi Yoshida
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.