Literature DB >> 28682454

Developing a national colorectal educational agenda: a survey of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

N K Francis1,2, N J Curtis1, C Weegenaar1, P A Boorman3, A Brook4, G Thorpe5, K Keogh3, J Grainger6, J Davies7, J Wheeler7, S R Brown8, R J Steele9, P Dawson10.   

Abstract

AIM: In order to develop its education agenda, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) sought the opinion of its members on current coloproctology training needs. The aims of this study were to canvass multidisciplinary needs and explore the perceived gaps and barriers to meeting them.
METHOD: A learner-needs analysis was performed between July 2015 and October 2016. A bespoke electronic survey was sent to 1453 colorectal healthcare professionals [ACPGBI membership (1173), colorectal nurse specialists and allied health professionals (NAHPs) (261) and regional chapter-leads (19)] seeking their needs, experiences and barriers to training across the coloproctology disciplines.
RESULTS: In all, 390 responses were received [26.8% overall; 180 consultants/trainees (15%); 196 NAHPs (75%); 14 (74%) chapter-leads]. Lack of funding and difficulties in obtaining study leave were the most frequently reported barriers to course and conference attendance. Transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic training were the top educational needs for consultants and trainees respectively. 79% of NAHP respondents reported education gaps on a broad range of clinical and non-clinical topics. NAHPs lacked information on relevant training opportunities and 27% felt available courses were insufficient to meet their educational needs. Wide heterogeneity in ACPGBI chapter composition and activity was reported. All groups felt the ACPGBI should increase the number of courses offered with coloproctology knowledge updates commonly requested.
CONCLUSION: A series of training needs across the coloproctology disciplines have been identified. These will underpin the development of the educational agenda for the ACPGBI. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990ACPGBIzzm321990; coloproctology; education; needs; survey; training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28682454     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  3 in total

Review 1.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Conticchio; Vincenzo Papagni; Margherita Notarnicola; Antonella Delvecchio; Umberto Riccelli; Michele Ammendola; Giuseppe Currò; Patrick Pessaux; Nicola Silvestris; Riccardo Memeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Recent updates in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeru Matsuda; Kimihiro Yamashita; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Taro Oshikiri; Masayoshi Hosono; Nobuhide Higashino; Masashi Yamamoto; Yoshiko Matsuda; Shingo Kanaji; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yasuo Sumi; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-02-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.