Literature DB >> 28681980

Spirometry training courses: Content, delivery and assessment - a position statement from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Maureen P Swanney1, Christopher A O'Dea2, Emily R Ingram1, Leanne T Rodwell3, Brigitte M Borg4.   

Abstract

Spirometry training courses are provided by health services and training organizations to enable widespread use of spirometry testing for patient care or for monitoring health. The primary outcome of spirometry training courses should be to enable participants to perform spirometry to international best practice, including testing of subjects, quality assurance and interpretation of results. Where valid results are not achieved or quality assurance programmes identify errors in devices, participants need to be able to adequately manage these issues in accordance with best practice. It is important that potential participants are confident in the integrity of the course they attend and that the course meets their expectations in terms of training. This position statement lists the content that the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science (ANZSRS) has identified as required in a spirometry training course to adequately meet the primary outcomes mentioned above. The content requirements outlined in this position statement are based on the current international spirometry standards set out by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society. Furthermore, recommendations around course delivery for theoretical and practical elements of spirometry testing and post-course assessment are outlined in this statement.
© 2017 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; quality; spirometry; spirometry training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28681980     DOI: 10.1111/resp.13133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  5 in total

1.  Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.

Authors:  Brian L Graham; Irene Steenbruggen; Martin R Miller; Igor Z Barjaktarevic; Brendan G Cooper; Graham L Hall; Teal S Hallstrand; David A Kaminsky; Kevin McCarthy; Meredith C McCormack; Cristine E Oropez; Margaret Rosenfeld; Sanja Stanojevic; Maureen P Swanney; Bruce R Thompson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Assessing spirometry competence through certification in community-based healthcare settings in Australia and New Zealand: A position paper of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science.

Authors:  Irene Schneider; Leanne Rodwell; Sarah Baum; Brigitte M Borg; Eleonora A Del Colle; Emily R Ingram; Maureen Swanney; Deborah Taylor
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 3.  Pharmacist Provided Spirometry Services: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alexa Sevin Valentino; Emily Eddy; Zachary Woods; Lori Wilken
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2021-08-28

4.  Safety and use of pulmonary function tests: a retrospective study from a single center over seven years' clinical practice.

Authors:  Fei Li; Zhi-Wen Huang; Xiao-Fei Wang; Hui-Wen Xu; Hua Yu; Yan-Bin Chen; Jian-An Huang; Jia-Jia Wang; Wei Lei
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Spirometry practice and the impact of a phase 1 training workshop among health workers in southern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Adaeze Ayuk; Chizalu Ndukwu; Samuel Uwaezuoke; Eno Ekop
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.317

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.