| Literature DB >> 28681842 |
C Yang1, D Souchay2, M Kneiß1, M Bogner3,4, H M Wei1, M Lorenz1, O Oeckler2, G Benstetter3, Y Q Fu4,5, M Grundmann1.
Abstract
Thermoelectric devices that are flexible and optically transparent hold unique promise for future electronics. However, development of invisible thermoelectric elements is hindered by the lack of p-type transparent thermoelectric materials. Here we present the superior room-temperature thermoelectric performance of p-type transparent copper iodide (CuI) thin films. Large Seebeck coefficients and power factors of the obtained CuI thin films are analysed based on a single-band model. The low-thermal conductivity of the CuI films is attributed to a combined effect of the heavy element iodine and strong phonon scattering. Accordingly, we achieve a large thermoelectric figure of merit of ZT=0.21 at 300 K for the CuI films, which is three orders of magnitude higher compared with state-of-the-art p-type transparent materials. A transparent and flexible CuI-based thermoelectric element is demonstrated. Our findings open a path for multifunctional technologies combing transparent electronics, flexible electronics and thermoelectricity.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28681842 PMCID: PMC5504294 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Thermoelectric properties of the p-type CuI thin films.
(a) Seebeck coefficients S, (b) hole mobility μ, (c) power factor PF, (d) thermal conductivity κ and (e) figure-of-merit ZT of γ-CuI thin films (thickness of 300 nm) deposited on glass as a function of hole concentration p at 300 K. (f) Figure-of-merit ZT of γ-CuI thin films deposited on glass near room temperature. In a the solid line is a fit with equation (4). In b and e the dashed line is a guide to eye indicating the averaged hole mobility μave or the saturation of ZT. In (c) the solid line is derived from the calculation using equation (6) with a single-band model, and the dashed line presents the theoretical data taking into account the non-parabolicity of the bands.
Figure 2Transparency and flexibility of the CuI thin films.
(a) Transmittance spectra of CuI thin film (thickness of 300 nm) deposited on glass. Inset is the (αhν)2 versus hν plot of CuI thin film. (b) The actual photo and (c) internal resistance Rint stability of a CuI thin film sample deposited on PET with different bending angles. (d) The reliability test by repeated bending cycles.
Figure 3A CuI-based single-leg thermoelectric module.
(a) Schematic illustration for the power output measurement of the CuI/PET single-leg thermoelectric device. (b) The example infrared image taken during one of the measurements. The electrical contacts appear cold in the image because of their different emissivity compared with CuI. (c) Output voltage Vout and output power Pout of a CuI-based thermoelectric leg as a function of output current Iout for three temperature differences.
Figure 4Figure of merit versus energy bandgap.
Comparing the thermoelectric ZT of typical n- and p-type thermoelectric materials and γ-CuI thin films (this work) at room temperature. Dashed line is guide to the eyes. Detailed data see Supplementary Table 1.