Si-Gong Zhang1, Yu-Xin Song2, Xiao-Ming Shu3, Hai-Li Shen1, Han-Bo Yang3, Rui-Xue Duo1, Guo-Chun Wang3. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China. 3. Department of Rheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Low-density granulocytes (LDGs) can form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) spontaneously and excessively. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are used for studying T lymphocytes, LDGs contained in the PBMCs may decrease the threshold of activating T lymphocytes by forming NETs. This study focused on the profiles of LDGs in common autoimmune diseases and methods for removing LDGs from PBMCs. METHODS: The percentages of LDGs in PBMCs from 55 patients with dermatomyositis (DM), 15 with polymyositis (PM), 42 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 25 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 19 healthy controls were determined by flow cytometry. Three methods of removing LDGs were explored and compared. After removal, PBMCs from six patients with positive T-SPOT.TB were tested again to find out if LDGs contained in the PBMCs could influence T lymphocyte reactions. RESULTS: Significantly higher LDG percentages were found in PBMCs from patients with DM ((8.41±10.87)%, P<0.0001), PM ((8.41±10.39)%, P<0.0001), RA ((4.05±6.97)%, P=0.0249), and SLE ((7.53±11.52)%, P=0.0006), compared with the controls ((1.28±0.73)%). The T-SPOT.TB values significantly decreased after LDGs were removed. Increasing relative centrifugal force (RCF) within a limited range can decrease the LDG percentage from an initial high level, but not markedly increase the LDG clearance rate. Compared with the whole blood sediment method, the PBMC adherence method can significantly remove LDGs yet scarcely influence the T lymphocyte percentage in PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS: The LDG percentage in PBMCs is significantly increased in patients with SLE, DM, PM, and RA. The influence of LDGs on T lymphocytes cannot be ignored in PBMC cultures. The adherence method is a simple and easy-to-use method for removing LDGs and purifying T lymphocytes from PBMCs.
OBJECTIVE: Low-density granulocytes (LDGs) can form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) spontaneously and excessively. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are used for studying T lymphocytes, LDGs contained in the PBMCs may decrease the threshold of activating T lymphocytes by forming NETs. This study focused on the profiles of LDGs in common autoimmune diseases and methods for removing LDGs from PBMCs. METHODS: The percentages of LDGs in PBMCs from 55 patients with dermatomyositis (DM), 15 with polymyositis (PM), 42 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 25 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 19 healthy controls were determined by flow cytometry. Three methods of removing LDGs were explored and compared. After removal, PBMCs from six patients with positive T-SPOT.TB were tested again to find out if LDGs contained in the PBMCs could influence T lymphocyte reactions. RESULTS: Significantly higher LDG percentages were found in PBMCs from patients with DM ((8.41±10.87)%, P<0.0001), PM ((8.41±10.39)%, P<0.0001), RA ((4.05±6.97)%, P=0.0249), and SLE ((7.53±11.52)%, P=0.0006), compared with the controls ((1.28±0.73)%). The T-SPOT.TB values significantly decreased after LDGs were removed. Increasing relative centrifugal force (RCF) within a limited range can decrease the LDG percentage from an initial high level, but not markedly increase the LDG clearance rate. Compared with the whole blood sediment method, the PBMC adherence method can significantly remove LDGs yet scarcely influence the T lymphocyte percentage in PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS: The LDG percentage in PBMCs is significantly increased in patients with SLE, DM, PM, and RA. The influence of LDGs on T lymphocytes cannot be ignored in PBMC cultures. The adherence method is a simple and easy-to-use method for removing LDGs and purifying T lymphocytes from PBMCs.
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Tuhina Neogi; Alan J Silman; Julia Funovits; David T Felson; Clifton O Bingham; Neal S Birnbaum; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian P Bykerk; Marc D Cohen; Bernard Combe; Karen H Costenbader; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Johanna M W Hazes; Kathryn Hobbs; Tom W J Huizinga; Arthur Kavanaugh; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Timothy Laing; Philip Mease; Henri A Ménard; Larry W Moreland; Raymond L Naden; Theodore Pincus; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Deborah Symmons; Paul P Tak; Katherine S Upchurch; Jirí Vencovsky; Frederick Wolfe; Gillian Hawker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eneida Villanueva; Srilakshmi Yalavarthi; Celine C Berthier; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Ritika Khandpur; Andrew M Lin; Cory J Rubin; Wenpu Zhao; Stephen H Olsen; Matthew Klinker; David Shealy; Michael F Denny; Joel Plumas; Laurence Chaperot; Matthias Kretzler; Allen T Bruce; Mariana J Kaplan Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Paulo C Rodriguez; Marc S Ernstoff; Claudia Hernandez; Michael Atkins; Jovanny Zabaleta; Rosa Sierra; Augusto C Ochoa Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mona Saffarzadeh; Christiane Juenemann; Markus A Queisser; Guenter Lochnit; Guillermo Barreto; Sebastian P Galuska; Juergen Lohmeyer; Klaus T Preissner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicholas D Johnson; Luoxiu Huang; Ronghua Li; Yun Li; Yuchen Yang; Hye Rim Kim; Crystal Grant; Hao Wu; Eric A Whitsel; Douglas P Kiel; Andrea A Baccarelli; Peng Jin; Joanne M Murabito; Karen N Conneely Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.528