| Literature DB >> 28681217 |
Aneta Zima1, Joanna Czechowska2, Dominika Siek2, Radosław Olkowski3,4,5, Magdalena Noga3, Małgorzata Lewandowska-Szumieł3,5, Anna Ślósarczyk2.
Abstract
Nowadays successful regeneration of damaged bone tissue is a major problem of the reconstructive medicine and tissue engineering. Recently a great deal of attention has been focused on calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) as the effective bone fillers. Despite a number of studies regarding CPCs, only a few compare the physicochemical and biological properties of α-TCP based materials of various phase compositions. In our study we compared the effect of several components (calcite, hydroxyapatite doped with Mg2+, CO32- or Ag+ ions, alginate, chitosan and methylcellulose) on the physicochemical and biological properties of α-TCP-based bone cements. The influence of materials composition on their setting times, microstructure and biochemical stability in simulated body fluid was determined. A number of in vitro laboratory methods, including ICP-OES, metabolic activity test, time-lapse microscopic observation and SEM observations were performed in order to assess biocompatibility of the studied biomaterials. The positive outcome of XTT tests for ceramic extracts demonstrated that all investigated cement-type composites may be considered cytocompatible according to ISO 10993-5 standard. Results of our research indicate that multiphase cements containing MgCHA, AgHA and calcite combined with αTCP enhanced cell viability in comparison to material based only on αTCP. Furthermore materials containing chitosan and methylcellulose possessed higher cytocompatibility than those with alginate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28681217 PMCID: PMC5498620 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5934-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med ISSN: 0957-4530 Impact factor: 3.896
The initial composition of powder batches and liquid phases of the studied materials
| Material | Solid phase | Liquid phase |
|---|---|---|
| T-1 | α-TCP | 1.0 wt% sodium alginate in 2.0 wt% Na2HPO4 |
| TC-1 | α-TCP: calcite (3:2) | 1.0 wt.% sodium alginate in 2.0 wt% Na2HPO4 |
| TC-2 | α-TCP: calcite (3:2) | 1.0 wt% chitosan in 2.7% acetic acid |
| T-AgHA | α-TCP: AgHA (3:2) | 0.75 wt% methylcellulose in 2.0wt.% Na2HPO4 |
| T-MgCHA | α-TCP: MgCHA (3:2) | 0.75 wt% methylcellulose in 2.0 wt% Na2HPO4 |
ICP-OES instrumental conditions
| Plasma | Argon |
|---|---|
| Nebulizer gas flow rate | 0.8 l min−1 |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate | 0.2 l min−1 |
| Plasma gas flow rate | 15.0 l min−1 |
| RF Generator power | 1300 W |
| Flow rate of sample | 1.5 ml min−1 |
| Plasma observation axial | (Mg, Ca P I S), radial (Na, K) |
| Reading parameters peak area | Five points per peak |
| Measurements | Three replicates, reading time—auto |
Fig. 1X-ray diffractogram of the initial α-TCP powder synthesized via the wet chemical method
Specific surface area and phase composition of the initial powders
| Initial powder | Specific surface area (m2/g) | Phase composition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-TCP | HA | Calcite | ||
| αTCP | 5.28 ± 0.02 | 93.4 ± 2.0 | 6.6 ± 2.0 | – |
| AgHA | 25.20 ± 0.02 | – | 99.5 ± 0.5 | – |
| MgCHA | 99.80 ± 0.20 | – | 100.0 ± 0.0 | – |
| Calcite | 0.24 ± 0.01 | – | – | 100.0 ± 0.0 |
Phase composition of the studied materials 7 days after setting and hardening before and after incubation in SBF
| Symbol of material | Phase composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-incubated in SBF | Incubated in SBF | |||||
| α-TCP (wt%) | HA (wt%) | Calcite (wt%) | α-TCP (wt%) | HA (wt%) | Calcite (wt%) | |
| T-1 | 75.8 ± 4.8 | 24.0 ± 4.9 | – | 5.1 ± 1.7 | 94.9 ± 1.6 | – |
| TC-1 | 40.0 ± 1.8 | 21.5 ± 2.8 | 38.6 ± 1.1 | 17.1 ± 0.6 | 45.8 ± 2.7 | 37.1 ± 2.1 |
| TC-2 | 44.4 ± 1.4 | 16.3 ± 2.3 | 39.3 ± 1.0 | 22.6 ± 1.0 | 37.1 ± 2.1 | 40.4 ± 1.1 |
| T-AgHA | 22.0 ± 3.4 | 76.8 ± 3.4 | – | 2.6 ± 1.0 | 97.4 ± 2.7 | – |
| T-MgCHA | 30.06 ± 2.4 | 69.4 ± 2.4 | – | 4.2 ± 2.4 | 95.8 ± 2.4 | – |
Initial and final setting time of the cement pastes
| Material | L/P (g/g) | Setting time (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial (I) | Final (F) | ||
| T-1 | 0.48 | 7 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 |
| TC-1 | 0.34 | 11 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 |
| TC-2 | 0.32 | 17 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 |
| T-AgHA | 0.60 | 6 ± 1 | 19 ± 1 |
| T-MgCHA | 0.56 | 6 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 |
Fig. 2Pore size distribution of the investigated materials
Concentrations of elements in simulated body fluid after different periods of incubation of the cement samples material
| Material | Time (day) | Concentration (mg/l) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | K | Mg | Na | P | Ag | ||
| Control (SBF) | 1 | 88.87 ± 1.78 | 276.79 ± 5.54 | 26.52 ± 0.53 | 3753.90 ± 93.85 | 34.00 ± 0.68 | – |
| T-1 | 1 | 72.57 ± 1.45 | 271.90 ± 8.16 | 5.57 ± 0.11 | 3930.4 ± 78.61 | 32.84 ± 0.66 | – |
| 3 | 72.26 ± 1.81 | 268.08 ± 7.51 | 3.08 ± 0.08 | 3825.2 ± 95.63 | 32.49 ± 0.81 | – | |
| 7 | 56.71 ± 1.70 | 268.46 ± 6.71 | 3.29 ± 0.10 | 3932.1 ± 94.37 | 28.68 ± 0.86 | – | |
| TC-2 | 1 | 61.74 ± 1.23 | 197.11 ± 5.91 | 38.26 ± 0.77 | 2813.2 ± 56.26 | 21.10 ± 0.42 | – |
| 3 | 93.14 ± 2.33 | 282.63 ± 7.35 | 37.04 ± 0.93 | 3945.8 ± 98.65 | 23.76 ± 0.59 | – | |
| 7 | 91.06 ± 1.91 | 281.94 ± 7.33 | 34.52 ± 0.72 | 3941.6 ± 82.77 | 18.75 ± 0.39 | – | |
| T-AgHA | 1 | 77.77 ± 2.18 | 291.04 ± 8.73 | 29.04 ± 0.81 | 3783.99 ± 98.38 | 31.56 ± 0.88 | 0.43 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 75.53 ± 1.89 | 222.64 ± 6,23 | 29.10 ± 0.73 | 3104.92 ± 77.62 | 32.26 ± 0.81 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | |
| 7 | 53.25 ± 0.96 | 350.80 ± 8.07 | 21.41 ± 0.39 | 4615.14 ± 83.07 | 33.22 ± 0.60 | 1.31 ± 0.02 | |
| T-MgCHA | 1 | 57.93 ± 1.10 | 229.68 ± 5.97 | 22.05 ± 0.42 | 3266.76 ± 62.07 | 30.57 ± 0.58 | – |
| 3 | 53.38 ± 1.07 | 251.85 ± 7.05 | 19.58 ± 0.39 | 3467.56 ± 69.35 | 25.84 ± 0.52 | – | |
| 7 | 40.18 ± 1.21 | 286.91 ± 7.46 | 16.64 ± 0.50 | 3960.88 ± 79.22 | 20.97 ± 0.63 | – | |
Fig. 3XTT assay results presented as a percentage of the cellular metabolic activity of MG-63 cells cultured in 100% ceramic extracts in comparison to the control (standard culture medium). For each extract cell viability is significantly higher than 70% of control viability, therefore each extract may be considered cytocompatible. Asterisks denote statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the samples and the value of 70% of control. However, there were no significant differences between the results obtained for the investigated materials
Fig. 4Morphology of MG-63 cells cultured in 100% extracts and standard culture medium (control) performed with inverted light microscope
Fig. 5Morphology and proliferation changes of MG-63 cells cultured in close contact with investigated ceramic materials in 48-well plate. Samples were placed into wells seeded with MG-63 cells. Time-lapse pictures of MG63 cells in five investigated conditions presented at four selected time points
Fig. 6SEM observation of MG-63 cells on surface of the cement samples after 2 days of in vitro culture in 48-well plate