Literature DB >> 28681109

Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis.

Fiona Allanson1, Carmela Pestell1, Gilles E Gignac1, Yong Xiang Yeo1, Michael Weinborn2.   

Abstract

Several neuropsychological dimensions are correlated with functional outcome (e.g., ability to return to family and community roles) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Commonly investigated neuropsychological dimensions include verbal memory, visuo-spatial construction, set-shifting, generativity, and processing speed. Unfortunately, small sample sizes across relevant studies have contributed to inconsistent results. Furthermore, no studies have concurrently measured all of the candidate neuropsychological predictors, most of which are known to be inter-correlated. Thus, the unique predictive effects associated with the candidate predictors in TBI recovery have never been investigated. Consequently, this study used both meta-analysis and multiple regression to statistically evaluate neuropsychological candidate predictors across two outcome variables (1) the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and (2) the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Based on the meta-analyses, the following neuropsychological dimensions were found to be correlated with the GOS-E: immediate verbal memory (r = .43, 95% CI [.27, .58]), delayed verbal memory (r = .43, 95% CI [.21, .61]), visuo-spatial construction (r = .29, 95% CI [.15, .53]), set-shifting (r = -.31, 95% CI [-.45, -.15], and generativity (r = .44, 95% CI [.32, .54]). By contrast, only one neuropsychological dimension was found to be significantly related to the DRS (generativity: r = -.21, 95% CI [-.39, -.01]). Multiple regression on the GOS-E relevant meta-analytically derived correlation matrix determined that all neuropsychological dimensions were significant predictors of the GOS-E (multiple R 2 = .31) with the exception of immediate verbal memory or learning. However, due to analytic characteristics, these findings must be interpreted with caution. Results were consistent with the need to consider multiple neuropsychological abilities in recovery and rehabilitation following TBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability Rating Scale; Functional outcome; Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended; Meta-analysis; Neuropsychological assessment; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28681109     DOI: 10.1007/s11065-017-9353-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  55 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Acute impact of severe traumatic brain injury on family structure and coping responses.

Authors:  G Curtiss; S Klemz; R D Vanderploeg
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.710

3.  The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and driving ability in dementia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark A Reger; Robert K Welsh; G Stennis Watson; Brenna Cholerton; Laura D Baker; Suzanne Craft
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Measuring participation as defined by the international classification of functioning, disability and health: an evaluation of existing measures.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Matthew A Plow
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Feasibility of the neuropsychological spectrum in prediction of outcome following head injury.

Authors:  A J Little; D I Templer; C S Persel; M J Ashley
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-07

6.  The relationship of neuropsychological status and productive outcomes following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D Girard; J Brown; M Burnett-Stolnack; N Hashimoto; S Hier-Wellmer; O Z Perlman; C Seigerman
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The ecological and construct validity of a newly developed measure of executive function: the Virtual Library Task.

Authors:  Belinda Renison; Jennie Ponsford; Renee Testa; Barry Richardson; Kylie Brownfield
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 8.  Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists.

Authors:  A D Nichol; A M Higgins; B J Gabbe; L J Murray; D J Cooper; P A Cameron
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Long-term neurological and neuropsychological outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Oliver P Gautschi; Mélanie C Huser; Nicolas R Smoll; Sven Maedler; Stephan Bednarz; Alexander von Hessling; Roger Lussmann; Gerhard Hildebrandt; Martin A Seule
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Predicting community integration after traumatic brain injury with neuropsychological measures.

Authors:  S R Millis; M Rosenthal; I F Lourie
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.292

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury on Episodic Memory: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eli Vakil; Yoram Greenstein; Izhak Weiss; Sarit Shtein
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  Apathy and Depression as Predictors of Activities of Daily Living Following Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries in Adults: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Green; Gilles E Gignac; Prue A Watson; Nicky Brosnan; Rodrigo Becerra; Carmela Pestell; Michael Weinborn
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Neuromodulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesca Buhagiar; Melinda Fitzgerald; Jason Bell; Fiona Allanson; Carmela Pestell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Questionnaires vs Interviews for the Assessment of Global Functional Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Lindsay Horton; Jonathan Rhodes; David K Menon; Andrew I R Maas; Lindsay Wilson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Case management after acquired brain injury compared to care as usual: study protocol for a 2-year pragmatic randomized controlled superiority trial with two parallel groups.

Authors:  Annemarie P M Stiekema; Christine Resch; Mireille Donkervoort; Natska Jansen; Kitty H M Jurrius; Judith M Zadoks; Caroline M van Heugten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.