Literature DB >> 28680918

Lipoic Acid Pharmacokinetics at Baseline and 1 year in Secondary Progressive MS.

Frank Bittner1, Charles Murchison1, Dennis Koop1, Dennis Bourdette1, Rebecca Spain1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28680918      PMCID: PMC5489386          DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm        ISSN: 2332-7812


× No keyword cloud information.
Lipoic acid (LA) is a water- and fat-soluble oral antioxidant with anti-inflammatory properties. It has demonstrated benefits in animal models of MS and has been evaluated for MS relapse prevention and neuroprotection. However, there are relatively a few data regarding LA pharmacokinetics (PK) in elderly populations or with use beyond 4 days.[1] In addition, studies have used a variety of doses, a wide age range of subjects, and have measured, at times, specific enantiomers rather than the more commercially available racemic form.[2]

Methods.

Presented herein are PK results drawn at baseline and 1 year in the LA cohort of patients with secondary progressive MS enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of daily oral LA. The study was approved by the Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Boards. Patients arrived after fasting for the prior 10 hours, and a predose sample was taken. Patients ate a meal immediately followed by 1,200 mg racemic LA (Pure Encapsulations, Sudbury, MA). Blood draws occurred at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 minutes after dose. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature; serum was separated by centrifugation and stored at −80°C until batch analysis by mass spectrometry.[3] Noncompartmental analysis determined pertinent PK parameters, including peak concentration (Cmax), time at peak concentration (Tmax), and observed bioavailability based on area under the curve (AUC) using common pharmacodynamics calculations. Baseline and 1-year differences were assessed using mixed models to account for serial correlation in the repeated measures and accommodate subjects with missing data at 1 year.

Results.

Fifty-four patients were randomized in the parent trial, and of the 28 assigned to LA, 27 took at least 1 dose of LA and were included in PK analysis. Patients demonstrated 87% compliance by pill counts. The average age of the LA cohort was 57.9 (SD 6.7) years, 59% were women, and 96% were Caucasian. The average disease duration was 30.9 (SD 9.3) years, and the median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 5.5 (range 3.0–8.0). The mean baseline Cmax was 14.9 ± 11.9 nmol/mL with a nonsignificant reduction at 1 year (11.3 ± 7.3, p = 0.17, figure, A). At baseline, the largest proportion of subjects (13, 48%) had Cmax values at the 90-minute draw, whereas at year 1, the largest plurality (9, 41%) had a Cmax value at the 120-minute draw, although this shift was not significant (p = 0.47). There was a nonsignificant reduction in bioavailability at 1 year (AUC 1407 ± 873 nmol/mL vs 1116 ± 647 nmol/mL, p = 0.10). Variability as measured by coefficient of variation (CV) was similar at baseline and 1 year (79.8% vs 64.9%), indicating stability in the PK measures, although the within-subject Cmax values at 30 minutes were often discrepant between years (158.5% and 179.4%, figure, B). The patients (103, 114, 144, 147, and 155) terminating early (glomerulonephritis, MRI intolerance, prostate cancer, gastrointestinal [GI] intolerance, and renal failure, respectively) did not have observably high Cmax levels.
Figure

Pharmacokinetic concentration vs time plots

(A) LA concentration at 6 time points over 120 minutes at baseline (n = 27) and 1 year (n = 22). Shown are mean values with SD bars. (B) Individual traces of baseline and 1-year mean LA peak concentrations. Variability measured by the mean coefficient of variation across the pharmacokinetic trace was similar at the 2 time points (79.8% vs 64.9%, respectively) with the highest variability found at 30 minutes (158.5% and 179.4%, respectively). LA = lipoic acid.

Pharmacokinetic concentration vs time plots

(A) LA concentration at 6 time points over 120 minutes at baseline (n = 27) and 1 year (n = 22). Shown are mean values with SD bars. (B) Individual traces of baseline and 1-year mean LA peak concentrations. Variability measured by the mean coefficient of variation across the pharmacokinetic trace was similar at the 2 time points (79.8% vs 64.9%, respectively) with the highest variability found at 30 minutes (158.5% and 179.4%, respectively). LA = lipoic acid.

Discussion.

Overall, patients maintained peak serum levels of daily oral LA, although there were nonsignificant reductions toward lower and later absorptions at 1 year. Cmax values occurred later (between 90 and 120 minutes) than a previous PK study of LA using the same dosing regimen (between 60 and 90 minutes).[3] Because of limited clearance data, the analysis was unable to calculate many common, tail-based noncompartmental analysis parameters, including half-life. Although the mean Cmax values were similar between baseline and 1 year, visual observation demonstrates high between-subject variability for the same year and within-subject variability between years based on the high coefficients of variation (CV >65%). A review of apparent outliers (115, 134, 137, and 149) did not reveal underlying differences (e.g., age, weight, and concomitant medications), nor were their mean brain atrophy rates different from the larger cohort. Breithaupt-Grögler et al. (1999) also noted high between-individual variability in Cmax values of LA (99% and 96% of the measured R and S LA enantiomers at the highest dose of 600 mg of racemic LA). Reasons for between- and within-subject variable absorptions may be due to an elderly population with erratic GI absorption, reduced hepatic perfusion, or drug-drug interactions. Alternatively, it may relate to intrinsic properties of LA or its delivery system.[4-6] Yet unknown is if the PK variability and rapid clearance of LA impacts its therapeutic efficacy or has dosing implications for clinical trials or clinical use. Further development of LA may depend on improving its bioavailability and tolerability. These PK data represent the longest duration use of LA in an MS-specific population.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly.

Authors:  Ulrich Klotz
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.518

2.  Pharmacokinetic study of lipoic acid in multiple sclerosis: comparing mice and human pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Vijayshree Yadav; Gail H Marracci; Myrna Y Munar; Ganesh Cherala; Lauren E Stuber; Lilia Alvarez; Lynne Shinto; Dennis R Koop; Dennis N Bourdette
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Dose-proportionality of oral thioctic acid--coincidence of assessments via pooled plasma and individual data.

Authors:  K Breithaupt-Grögler; G Niebch; E Schneider; K Erb; R Hermann; H H Blume; B S Schug; G G Belz
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Plasma kinetics, metabolism, and urinary excretion of alpha-lipoic acid following oral administration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jens Teichert; Robert Hermann; Peter Ruus; Rainer Preiss
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Investigation of the drug-drug interaction between alpha-lipoic acid and valproate via mitochondrial beta-oxidation.

Authors:  Lee Cheng Phua; Lee Sun New; Catherine W Goh; Aveline H Neo; Edward R Browne; Eric C Y Chan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Enantiomer-selective pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability, and sex effects of various alpha-lipoic acid dosage forms.

Authors:  Robert Hermann; Julius Mungo; Peter Jürgen Cnota; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-28
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Alpha lipoic acid reverses scopolamine-induced spatial memory loss and pyramidal cell neurodegeneration in the prefrontal cortex of Wistar rats.

Authors:  Adejoke Elizabeth Memudu; Rukky Precious Adanike
Journal:  IBRO Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 2.  Lipoic Acid and Other Antioxidants as Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Carin Waslo; Dennis Bourdette; Nora Gray; Kirsten Wright; Rebecca Spain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Failed, Interrupted, or Inconclusive Trials on Neuroprotective and Neuroregenerative Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Update 2015-2020.

Authors:  Niklas Huntemann; Leoni Rolfes; Marc Pawlitzki; Tobias Ruck; Steffen Pfeuffer; Heinz Wiendl; Sven G Meuth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Role of lipoic acid in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hongsheng Xie; Xiufang Yang; Yuan Cao; Xipeng Long; Huifang Shang; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.243

5.  Redox Active α-Lipoic Acid Differentially Improves Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Cellular Model of Alzheimer and Its Control Cells.

Authors:  Fabian Dieter; Carsten Esselun; Gunter P Eckert
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Alpha-Lipoic Acid: Beneficial or Harmful in Alzheimer's Disease?

Authors:  Sávio Monteiro Dos Santos; Camila Fernanda Rodrigues Romeiro; Caroline Azulay Rodrigues; Alícia Renata Lima Cerqueira; Marta Chagas Monteiro
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 6.543

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.