Literature DB >> 28680885

Retracted: A Comparison between Three-Dimensional Visualization Guided Hepatectomy and Ultrasonography Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria.

BioMed Research International.   

Abstract

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2016/8931732.].

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28680885      PMCID: PMC5478884          DOI: 10.1155/2017/8014852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


At the request of the authors, the article titled “A Comparison between Three-Dimensional Visualization Guided Hepatectomy and Ultrasonography Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria” [1] has been retracted. The article was found to contain substantial errors, as detailed below, which mean the data do not support the conclusions. The authors apologize for these errors. (1) Nine patients were wrongly classified. Five patients in the surgery group with mixed hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma in the postoperative pathological analysis, were wrongly recorded as having hepatocellular carcinoma based on intraoperative frozen section examination. Four patients in the radiofrequency ablation group had severe dysplasia rather than hepatocellular carcinoma according to histopathology in the follow-up period. When these patients are excluded, liver function is a risk factor for survival (hazard ratio = 1.8, p = 0.015), but this parameter was wrongly excluded from the risk factors in the published article. (2) There was high multicollinearity between liver function of Child-Pugh Class and Tbil, Alb, and PT (eigenvalue = 0.07≈0, condition index = 20.484 > 10; Table 1). Due to this, the results may change unpredictably in response to small changes in the model or the data [2]. To overcome this issue, we need a larger sample size and improved statistical methodologies [3].
Table 1

Results of the collinearity diagnostics.

Collinearity diagnosticsa
ModelDimensionEigenvalueCondition indexVariance proportions
(Constant)TbilALBPT
112.9721.0000.000.020.000.02
20.8451.8760.000.010.000.97
30.1774.1030.010.910.020.00
40.00720.4840.990.060.980.01

aDependent variable: Child-Pugh.

  3 in total

1.  Problems of correlations between explanatory variables in multiple regression analyses in the dental literature.

Authors:  Y-K Tu; M Kellett; V Clerehugh; M S Gilthorpe
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Collinearity and multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Pierre-Géraud Claret; Xavier Bobbia; Jean Emmanuel de La Coussaye
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A Comparison between Three-Dimensional Visualization Guided Hepatectomy and Ultrasonography Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria.

Authors:  Tian-Pei Guan; Chi-Hua Fang; Jian Yang; Nan Xiang; Qing-Shan Chen; Shi-Zhen Zhong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Survival comparison between radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongchun Xuan; Weibo Wen; Dongyuan Xu; Toufeng Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.