Literature DB >> 28680777

Proposal for a Pharmacogenetic Decision Algorithm.

Saeed K Alzghari1, Lori Blakeney1, Kerry Anne Rambaran2.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine is playing an ever-increasing role in patient care. Over the past decade, awareness of the role of pharmacogenetics and its benefits is leading to its growing acceptance among providers. Though providers are using pharmacogenetics in practice, the decision-making process of when to use this tool can be ambiguous. Herein, we propose an algorithm to help guide providers on when to use pharmacogenetics for patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotechnology; cytochrome p450; pharmacodynamics; pharmacogenetics; pharmacokinetics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28680777      PMCID: PMC5493454          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Editorial

The advent of personalized medicine is revolutionizing healthcare. Pharmacogenetics is the study of drug responses in relation to specific genetic polymorphisms [1]. The cost of performing pharmacogenetic testing is falling, leading to increased opportunities for patient-centered care [2]. Adverse drug effects and treatment failure are two key reasons as to why pharmacogenetics is gaining acceptance among clinicians as a tool for building assessments and subsequent treatment plans for patients [3-5]. In considering utilizing pharmacogenetics, a clinician needs to have a clear reason as to why a pharmacogenetic test is ordered. We propose an algorithm describing when to perform a pharmacogenetic test (Figure 1). If a patient’s medication is not therapeutically effective, is causing a number of adverse effects, or if a patient is taking two or more medications, a clinician can consider performing a pharmacogenetic test on their patient. A clinician must also consider whether the medications in question metabolize through pharmacokinetic enzymes (i.e., what the body does to the drug) or pharmacodynamic enzymes (i.e., what the drug does to the body) to affect response. If pharmacokinetic enzymes are involved, testing for cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and others can determine whether patients might have a poor, intermediate, normal, or rapid metabolizer status. Furthermore, it is important to consider if the medication(s) a patient may be on are cytochrome P450 inhibitors (i.e., ritonavir) or inducers (i.e., rifampin) that could lead to drug-drug interactions. If pharmacodynamic enzymes are involved, testing for enzymes such as the mu-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) or vitamin K epoxide reductase subunit 1 (VKORC1) can determine responses to certain medications. If the patient improved clinically after a medication dose change or after taking alternative medication based on pharmacogenetic testing, then follow-up with the patient as necessary. If the patient did not improve, a clinician should consider alternative differential diagnoses.
Figure 1

Pharmacogenetic decision algorithm

In our experience with clinicians considering performing pharmacogenetic testing, the decision of when to perform the actual test comes into question. The algorithm we propose is a simple tool for clinicians to reference in making their decision. One very important point is that the subjective (i.e., past medical history, reported response to medications) and objective (i.e., clinical lab panels) information of a patient needs to be considered before deciding on a pharmacogenetic test. Incomplete or missing medical information may limit the utility of a pharmacogenetic test since the entire patient picture may not be clearly in view. In conclusion, pharmacogenetic testing may be of great benefit to the right patient requiring this test. We want our algorithm to help in this clinical decision-making process and believe this is a tool to guide clinicians wanting to perform this type of test.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response.

Authors:  Stefano Porcelli; Antonio Drago; Chiara Fabbri; Sara Gibiino; Raffaella Calati; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics and antipsychotics: therapeutic efficacy and side effects prediction.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Zhang; Anil K Malhotra
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jessica L Mega; Tabassome Simon; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Kevin Bliden; Christopher P Cannon; Nicolas Danchin; Betti Giusti; Paul Gurbel; Benjamin D Horne; Jean-Sebastian Hulot; Adnan Kastrati; Gilles Montalescot; Franz-Josef Neumann; Lei Shen; Dirk Sibbing; P Gabriel Steg; Dietmar Trenk; Stephen D Wiviott; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Pharmacogenomics in clinical practice: reality and expectations.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-07

5.  Personalized medicine and the practice of medicine in the 21st century.

Authors:  Amalia M Issa
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2007-01
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Multiple adverse drug reactions and genetic polymorphism testing: A case report with negative result.

Authors:  Ana Lucía Arellano; Marta Martin-Subero; Mar Monerris; Adrián LLerena; Magí Farré; Eva Montané
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase A1298C Polymorphism and Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Kevin Cho; Zubair M Amin; Jie An; Kerry Anne Rambaran; Tyler B Johnson; Saeed K Alzghari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-10-01

3.  An Unnecessary Pain: Using Pharmacogenetics for Statin-related Skeletal Muscle Toxicity.

Authors:  Saeed K Alzghari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-04-30

4.  Putting Out the Fire: The Relationship of Pharmacogenetics and Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Connor L Zheng; Saeed K Alzghari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.