Annabelle Cumyn1, Nadine Sauvé1, Évelyne Rey2. 1. Department of Medicine, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists for the optimal management of atrial fibrillation with a structurally normal heart in pregnancy. METHODS: A survey was sent to members of two associations to obtain input on optimal management of atrial fibrillation in pregnancy. The survey presented four cases with respect to (1) baseline investigations; (2) rate versus rhythm control; (3) chemical versus electrical cardioversion; and (4) anticoagulation. RESULTS: Sixty-one responders from 11 countries participated. High agreement was noted for baseline investigations. A quarter (25%) of participants chose elective cardioversion even with a reversible precipitant. Electrical cardioversion was preferred over chemical (p < 0.05). Anticoagulation strategies were heterogeneous except in the presence of a left atrial appendage thrombus. DISCUSSION: This study revealed that there was little consensus in current practice in pregnancy beyond basic investigations. An adaptation of established guidelines to the pregnant population would require a meeting of Cardiologists with input from colleagues in Obstetric Medicine.
BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists for the optimal management of atrial fibrillation with a structurally normal heart in pregnancy. METHODS: A survey was sent to members of two associations to obtain input on optimal management of atrial fibrillation in pregnancy. The survey presented four cases with respect to (1) baseline investigations; (2) rate versus rhythm control; (3) chemical versus electrical cardioversion; and (4) anticoagulation. RESULTS: Sixty-one responders from 11 countries participated. High agreement was noted for baseline investigations. A quarter (25%) of participants chose elective cardioversion even with a reversible precipitant. Electrical cardioversion was preferred over chemical (p < 0.05). Anticoagulation strategies were heterogeneous except in the presence of a left atrial appendage thrombus. DISCUSSION: This study revealed that there was little consensus in current practice in pregnancy beyond basic investigations. An adaptation of established guidelines to the pregnant population would require a meeting of Cardiologists with input from colleagues in Obstetric Medicine.
Authors: Ramesh M Gowda; Gopikrishna Punukollu; Ijaz A Khan; Sabrina L Wilbur; Victor S Navarro; Balendu C Vasavada; Terrence J Sacchi Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: John A Cairns; Stuart Connolly; Sean McMurtry; Michael Stephenson; Mario Talajic Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 2.942