Literature DB >> 2868029

Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study. Part II. Secondary coronary prevention with persantine and aspirin.

C R Klimt, G L Knatterud, J Stamler, P Meier.   

Abstract

In the Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study, Part II (PARIS II), 3,128 persons who had recovered from myocardial infarction, suffered from 4 weeks to 4 months previously, were randomized into two groups: dipyridamole (Persantine) plus aspirin (n = 1,563) and placebo (n = 1,565). The average length of follow-up was 23.4 months. Prespecified primary end points were coronary incidence (definite nonfatal myocardial infarction plus death due to recent or acute cardiac event), coronary mortality (death due to recent or acute cardiac event) and total mortality, each at 1 year of patient follow-up and at the end of the study. Coronary incidence in the Persantine plus aspirin group was significantly lower than in the placebo group, both at 1 year (30% reduction) and at the end of the study (24% reduction). The statistically significant differences in coronary incidence, at 1 year and at the end of the study, in favor of the combination treatment remained after adjustment for multiple baseline variables and adjustment for multiple testing (three end points for two time periods). Although there were reductions for other end points, these differences were not statistically significant. Coronary mortality was 20% lower in the Persantine plus aspirin group compared with the placebo group at 1 year, and 6% lower overall. Total mortality in the treated group compared with the placebo group was 11% lower at 1 year and 3% lower overall. The reduced rates of coronary incidence largely reflected lower rates of definite nonfatal myocardial infarction in the Persantine plus aspirin group. Several subgroups were defined a priori and at the end of the study. The beneficial effect of Persantine plus aspirin compared with placebo for coronary incidence tended to be greater for the following groups of patients: those who had a non-Q wave infarct; those who were not taking digitalis; those who were receiving beta-receptor blocking drugs at baseline; those who were in New York Heart Association functional class I; those who had had only one myocardial infarction; or those who were enrolled in the study early, that is within 85 days of the qualifying myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2868029     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80489-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  32 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Clotting for the Clinician: An Overview of Thrombosis and Antithrombotic Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Preventing atherosclerotic events with aspirin.

Authors:  John G F Cleland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

4.  Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

Review 5.  A review of antiplatelet drugs, coronary artery diseases and cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Yajun Ren; Kirti Patel; Terry Crane
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-06

Review 6.  Management of acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The role of prophylactic diltiazem therapy and indications for predischarge coronary arteriography.

Authors:  R S Gibson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The current role of platelet-active drugs in ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  D M Kerins; G A FitzGerald
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Is aspirin safe for patients with heart failure?

Authors:  J G Cleland; C J Bulpitt; R H Falk; I N Findlay; C M Oakley; G Murray; P A Poole-Wilson; C R Prentice; G C Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

9.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

Review 10.  Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Yh Lip
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.