W K Evans1, R Truscott2, E Cameron2, A Peter2, R Reid3, P Selby4, P Smith5, A Hey6. 1. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton. 2. Division of Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto. 3. University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa. 4. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto. 5. Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay; and. 6. Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A large body of evidence clearly shows that cancer patients experience significant health benefits with smoking cessation. Cancer Care Ontario, the provincial agency responsible for the quality of cancer services in Ontario, has undertaken a province-wide smoking cessation initiative. The strategies used, the results achieved, and the lessons learned are the subject of the present article. METHODS: Evidence related to the health benefits of smoking cessation in cancer patients was reviewed. A steering committee developed a vision statement for the initiative, created a framework for implementation, and made recommendations for the key elements of the initiative and for smoking cessation best practices. RESULTS: New ambulatory cancer patients are being screened for their smoking status in each of Ontario's 14 regional cancer centres. Current or recent smokers are advised of the benefits of cessation and are directed to smoking cessation resources as appropriate. Performance metrics are captured and used to drive improvement through quarterly performance reviews and provincial rankings of the regional cancer centres. CONCLUSIONS: Regional smoking cessation champions, commitment from Cancer Care Ontario senior leadership, a provincial secretariat, and guidance from smoking cessation experts have been important enablers of early success. Data capture has been difficult because of the variety of information systems in use and non-standardized administrative and clinical processes. Numerous challenges remain, including increasing physician engagement; obtaining funding for key program elements, including in-house resources to support smoking cessation; and overcoming financial barriers to access nicotine replacement therapy. Future efforts will focus on standardizing processes to the extent possible, while tailoring the approaches to the populations served and the resources available within the individual regional cancer programs.
PURPOSE: A large body of evidence clearly shows that cancerpatients experience significant health benefits with smoking cessation. Cancer Care Ontario, the provincial agency responsible for the quality of cancer services in Ontario, has undertaken a province-wide smoking cessation initiative. The strategies used, the results achieved, and the lessons learned are the subject of the present article. METHODS: Evidence related to the health benefits of smoking cessation in cancerpatients was reviewed. A steering committee developed a vision statement for the initiative, created a framework for implementation, and made recommendations for the key elements of the initiative and for smoking cessation best practices. RESULTS: New ambulatory cancerpatients are being screened for their smoking status in each of Ontario's 14 regional cancer centres. Current or recent smokers are advised of the benefits of cessation and are directed to smoking cessation resources as appropriate. Performance metrics are captured and used to drive improvement through quarterly performance reviews and provincial rankings of the regional cancer centres. CONCLUSIONS: Regional smoking cessation champions, commitment from Cancer Care Ontario senior leadership, a provincial secretariat, and guidance from smoking cessation experts have been important enablers of early success. Data capture has been difficult because of the variety of information systems in use and non-standardized administrative and clinical processes. Numerous challenges remain, including increasing physician engagement; obtaining funding for key program elements, including in-house resources to support smoking cessation; and overcoming financial barriers to access nicotine replacement therapy. Future efforts will focus on standardizing processes to the extent possible, while tailoring the approaches to the populations served and the resources available within the individual regional cancer programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Smoking cessation; program implementation
Authors: G P Browman; G Wong; I Hodson; J Sathya; R Russell; L McAlpine; P Skingley; M N Levine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-01-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Benjamin A Toll; Thomas H Brandon; Ellen R Gritz; Graham W Warren; Roy S Herbst Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William K Evans; Rebecca Truscott; Erin Cameron; Sargam Rana; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Mohammad Haque; Linda Rabeneck Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2019-05
Authors: Meredith Elana Giuliani; Geoffrey Liu; Wei Xu; Mihaela Dirlea; Peter Selby; Janet Papadakos; Nazek Abdelmutti; Dongyang Yang; Lawson Eng; David Paul Goldstein; Jennifer Michelle Jones Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Wayne K deRuiter; Megan Barker; Alma Rahimi; Anna Ivanova; Laurie Zawertailo; Osnat C Melamed; Peter Selby Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Thulasee Jose; Joshua W Ohde; J Taylor Hays; Michael V Burke; David O Warner Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390