Literature DB >> 28679796

The Ol1mpiad: concordance of behavioural faculties of stage 1 and stage 3 Drosophila larvae.

Maria J Almeida-Carvalho1, Dimitri Berh2,3, Andreas Braun4,5, Yi-Chun Chen6, Katharina Eichler7, Claire Eschbach7, Pauline M J Fritsch8, Bertram Gerber6,9,10, Nina Hoyer11, Xiaoyi Jiang3, Jörg Kleber12, Christian Klämbt2, Christian König13,14, Matthieu Louis4,5,15, Birgit Michels12, Anton Miroschnikow16, Christen Mirth1,17, Daisuke Miura18, Thomas Niewalda6, Nils Otto2, Emmanouil Paisios12, Michael J Pankratz16, Meike Petersen11, Noel Ramsperger19, Nadine Randel7, Benjamin Risse2,3, Timo Saumweber12, Philipp Schlegel16, Michael Schleyer12, Peter Soba11, Simon G Sprecher8, Teiichi Tanimura18, Andreas S Thum19, Naoko Toshima12,18, Jim W Truman7,20, Ayse Yarali10,13, Marta Zlatic7.   

Abstract

Mapping brain function to brain structure is a fundamental task for neuroscience. For such an endeavour, the Drosophila larva is simple enough to be tractable, yet complex enough to be interesting. It features about 10,000 neurons and is capable of various taxes, kineses and Pavlovian conditioning. All its neurons are currently being mapped into a light-microscopical atlas, and Gal4 strains are being generated to experimentally access neurons one at a time. In addition, an electron microscopic reconstruction of its nervous system seems within reach. Notably, this electron microscope-based connectome is being drafted for a stage 1 larva - because stage 1 larvae are much smaller than stage 3 larvae. However, most behaviour analyses have been performed for stage 3 larvae because their larger size makes them easier to handle and observe. It is therefore warranted to either redo the electron microscopic reconstruction for a stage 3 larva or to survey the behavioural faculties of stage 1 larvae. We provide the latter. In a community-based approach we called the Ol1mpiad, we probed stage 1 Drosophila larvae for free locomotion, feeding, responsiveness to substrate vibration, gentle and nociceptive touch, burrowing, olfactory preference and thermotaxis, light avoidance, gustatory choice of various tastants plus odour-taste associative learning, as well as light/dark-electric shock associative learning. Quantitatively, stage 1 larvae show lower scores in most tasks, arguably because of their smaller size and lower speed. Qualitatively, however, stage 1 larvae perform strikingly similar to stage 3 larvae in almost all cases. These results bolster confidence in mapping brain structure and behaviour across developmental stages.
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feeding; Learning and memory; Locomotion; Navigation; Sensory processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679796     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.156646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  17 in total

Review 1.  Midline axon guidance in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system.

Authors:  LaFreda J Howard; Haley E Brown; Benjamin C Wadsworth; Timothy A Evans
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 2.  Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development: Neurogenesis, Gliogenesis, Cell Fate, and Differentiation.

Authors:  Stephen T Crews
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sensorimotor pathway controlling stopping behavior during chemotaxis in the Drosophila melanogaster larva.

Authors:  Ibrahim Tastekin; Avinash Khandelwal; David Tadres; Nico D Fessner; James W Truman; Marta Zlatic; Albert Cardona; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain.

Authors:  Katharina Eichler; Feng Li; Ashok Litwin-Kumar; Youngser Park; Ingrid Andrade; Casey M Schneider-Mizell; Timo Saumweber; Annina Huser; Claire Eschbach; Bertram Gerber; Richard D Fetter; James W Truman; Carey E Priebe; L F Abbott; Andreas S Thum; Marta Zlatic; Albert Cardona
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Mini-brain computations converting dynamic olfactory inputs into orientation behavior.

Authors:  Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  The sulfite oxidase Shopper controls neuronal activity by regulating glutamate homeostasis in Drosophila ensheathing glia.

Authors:  Nils Otto; Zvonimir Marelja; Andreas Schoofs; Holger Kranenburg; Jonas Bittern; Kerem Yildirim; Dimitri Berh; Maria Bethke; Silke Thomas; Sandra Rode; Benjamin Risse; Xiaoyi Jiang; Michael Pankratz; Silke Leimkühler; Christian Klämbt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Reversal learning in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Nino Mancini; Sia Hranova; Julia Weber; Aliće Weiglein; Michael Schleyer; Denise Weber; Andreas S Thum; Bertram Gerber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Functional architecture of reward learning in mushroom body extrinsic neurons of larval Drosophila.

Authors:  Timo Saumweber; Astrid Rohwedder; Michael Schleyer; Katharina Eichler; Yi-Chun Chen; Yoshinori Aso; Albert Cardona; Claire Eschbach; Oliver Kobler; Anne Voigt; Archana Durairaja; Nino Mancini; Marta Zlatic; James W Truman; Andreas S Thum; Bertram Gerber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Conserved neural circuit structure across Drosophila larval development revealed by comparative connectomics.

Authors:  Stephan Gerhard; Ingrid Andrade; Richard D Fetter; Albert Cardona; Casey M Schneider-Mizell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Assaying Mechanonociceptive Behavior in Drosophila Larvae.

Authors:  Nina Hoyer; Meike Petersen; Federico Tenedini; Peter Soba
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2018-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.