Literature DB >> 28679779

Molecular Effects of Stromal-Selective Targeting by uPAR-Retargeted Oncolytic Virus in Breast Cancer.

Yuqi Jing1, Valery Chavez1, Yuguang Ban2, Nicolas Acquavella1, Doraya El-Ashry1, Alexey Pronin3, Xi Chen2, Jaime R Merchan4.   

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a relevant target for novel biological therapies. MV-m-uPA and MV-h-uPA are fully retargeted, species-specific, oncolytic measles viruses (MV) directed against murine or human urokinase receptor (PLAUR/uPAR), expressed in tumor and stromal cells. The effects of stromal-selective targeting by uPAR-retargeted MVs were investigated. In vitro infection, virus-induced GFP expression, and cytotoxicity by MV-h-uPA and MV-m-uPA were demonstrated in human and murine cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts in a species-specific manner. In a murine fibroblast/human breast cancer 3D coculture model, selective fibroblast targeting by MV-m-uPA inhibited breast cancer cell growth. Systemic administration of murine-specific MV-m-uPA in mice bearing human MDA-MB-231 xenografts was associated with a significant delay in tumor progression and improved survival compared with controls. Experiments comparing tumor (MV-h-uPA) versus stromal (MV-m-uPA) versus combined virus targeting showed that tumor and stromal targeting was associated with improved tumor control over the other groups. Correlative studies confirmed in vivo viral targeting of tumor stroma by MV-m-uPA, increased apoptosis, and virus-induced differential regulation of murine stromal genes associated with inflammatory, angiogenesis, and survival pathways, as well as indirect regulation of human cancer pathways, indicating viral-induced modulation of tumor-stroma interactions. These data demonstrate the feasibility of stromal-selective targeting by an oncolytic MV, virus-induced modulation of tumor-stroma pathways, and subsequent tumor growth delay. These findings further validate the critical role of stromal uPAR in cancer progression and the potential of oncolytic viruses as antistromal agents.Implications: The current report demonstrates for the first time the biological, in vitro, and in vivo antitumor and molecular effects of stromal selective targeting by an oncolytic virus. Mol Cancer Res; 15(10); 1410-20. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679779      PMCID: PMC5682105          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  49 in total

1.  NanoStringNorm: an extensible R package for the pre-processing of NanoString mRNA and miRNA data.

Authors:  Daryl Waggott; Kenneth Chu; Shaoming Yin; Bradly G Wouters; Fei-Fei Liu; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The chemotaxis of M1 and M2 macrophages is regulated by different chemokines.

Authors:  Wenjuan Xuan; Qing Qu; Biao Zheng; Sidong Xiong; Guo-Huang Fan
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.962

3.  Quantification of uPA receptor expression in human breast cancer cell lines by cRT-PCR.

Authors:  G Sliutz; H Eder; H Koelbl; C Tempfer; L Auerbach; C Schneeberger; C Kainz; R Zeillinger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Rescue and propagation of fully retargeted oncolytic measles viruses.

Authors:  Takafumi Nakamura; Kah-Whye Peng; Mary Harvey; Suzanne Greiner; Ian A J Lorimer; Charles D James; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-01-30       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Endothelial and macrophage upregulation of urokinase receptor expression in human renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; J Hagege; J D Doublet; P Callard; J D Sraer; E Ronne; E Rondeau
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  The urokinase receptor promotes cancer metastasis independently of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in mice.

Authors:  Minji Jo; Shinako Takimoto; Valerie Montel; Steven L Gonias
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  Oncolytic virus therapy for cancer: the first wave of translational clinical trials.

Authors:  Manish R Patel; Robert A Kratzke
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  Macrophage-derived chemokine CCL22 and regulatory T cells in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  I Wertel; J Surówka; G Polak; B Barczyński; W Bednarek; J Jakubowicz-Gil; A Bojarska-Junak; J Kotarski
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 9.  Targeting tumor vasculature through oncolytic virotherapy: recent advances.

Authors:  Marcela Toro Bejarano; Jaime R Merchan
Journal:  Oncolytic Virother       Date:  2015-11-11

10.  The transcriptional signature of human ovarian carcinoma macrophages is associated with extracellular matrix reorganization.

Authors:  Florian Finkernagel; Silke Reinartz; Sonja Lieber; Till Adhikary; Annika Wortmann; Nathalie Hoffmann; Tim Bieringer; Andrea Nist; Thorsten Stiewe; Julia M Jansen; Uwe Wagner; Sabine Müller-Brüsselbach; Rolf Müller
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-15
View more
  15 in total

1.  Did evolution create a flexible ligand-binding cavity in the urokinase receptor through deletion of a plesiotypic disulfide bond?

Authors:  Julie M Leth; Haydyn D T Mertens; Katrine Zinck Leth-Espensen; Thomas J D Jørgensen; Michael Ploug
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Gastrointestinal cancer-associated fibroblasts expressing Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A are amenable to infection by oncolytic reovirus.

Authors:  Lukas J A C Hawinkels; Vera Kemp; Tom J Harryvan; Matteo Golo; Nicole Dam; Mark J A Schoonderwoerd; Elham Aida Farshadi; Marten Hornsveld; Rob C Hoeben
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.854

3.  Germline mutations and blood malignancy (Review).

Authors:  Yuping Gong; Jili Deng; Xia Wu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  Oncolytic virotherapy reverses the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and its potential in combination with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yalei Zhang; Ye Li; Kun Chen; Ling Qian; Peng Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 5.  Beyond cancer cells: Targeting the tumor microenvironment with gene therapy and armed oncolytic virus.

Authors:  Peter Kok-Ting Wan; Anderson J Ryan; Leonard W Seymour
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 6.  Three-dimensional tumor cell cultures employed in virotherapy research.

Authors:  Linus D Kloker; Can Yurttas; Ulrich M Lauer
Journal:  Oncolytic Virother       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 7.  Simultaneous Tumor and Stroma Targeting by Oncolytic Viruses.

Authors:  Anne Everts; Melissa Bergeman; Grant McFadden; Vera Kemp
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-11-05

8.  Oncolytic adenovirus: A tool for reversing the tumor microenvironment and promoting cancer treatment (Review).

Authors:  Xiaoxi Wang; Liping Zhong; Yongxiang Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  In vivo antitumor activity by dual stromal and tumor-targeted oncolytic measles viruses.

Authors:  Yuqi Jing; Valery Chavez; Natasha Khatwani; Yuguang Ban; Andrea P Espejo; Xi Chen; Jaime R Merchan
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 5.987

10.  MicroRNA-132 suppresses migration and invasion of renal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Wenbao Lu; Xinmin Zhou; Hua Huang; Shaochen Shen; Lian Guo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.