Ekaterina Maslova1,2,3, Susanne Hansen4, Louise Groth Grunnet5, Marin Strøm4, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard4, Line Hjort3,5,6, Freja Bach Kampmann3,5,7, Camilla Møller Madsen5, A C Baun Thuesen5, Bodil Hammer Bech8, Thorhallur I Halldorsson4,9,10, Allan A Vaag5,6,11, Sjurdur F Olsen4,12. 1. Centre for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; kmv@ssi.dk. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom. 3. Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense, Denmark. 4. Centre for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Endocrinology-Diabetes and Metabolism, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Division for Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søborg, Denmark. 8. Section for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 9. Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 10. Unit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland. 11. Early Clinical Development, AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden; and. 12. Department of Nutrition, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Background: Recent years have seen strong tendencies toward high-protein diets. However, the implications of higher protein intake, especially during developmentally sensitive periods, are poorly understood. Conversely, evidence on the long-term developmental consequences of low protein intake in free-living populations remains limited.Objective: We examined the association of protein intake in pregnancy with offspring metabolic health at age 9-16 y in a longitudinal cohort that oversampled pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Design: Six hundred eight women with an index pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes mellitus and 626 controls enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort were used for the analysis. Protein (total, animal, vegetable) intake was assessed by using a food-frequency questionnaire in gestational week 25. The offspring underwent a clinical examination including fasting blood samples and a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (subset of 650) from which metabolic outcomes were derived. Multivariable analyses were conducted applying a 1:1 substitution of carbohydrates for protein. Results: The mean ± SD protein intake in pregnancy was 93 ± 15 g/d (16% ± 3% of energy) in GDM-exposed women and 90 ± 14 g/d (16% ± 2% of energy) in control women. There were overall no associations between maternal protein intake and offspring fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). We found that maternal total protein intake was associated with a tendency for a higher abdominal fat mass percentage (quartile 4 compared with quartile 1: 0.40 SD; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.83 SD; P = 0.07) in GDM-exposed offspring and a tendency for a higher total fat mass percentage among male offspring (quartile 4 compared with quartile 1: 0.33 SD; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.66 SD; P = 0.06), but a small sample size may have compromised the precision of the effect estimates. GDM-exposed offspring of mothers with a protein intake in the lowest decile (≤12.5% of energy compared with >12.5% of energy) had lower fasting insulin (ratio of geometric means: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99; P = 0.04) and a tendency toward lower HOMA-IR (ratio of geometric means: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.02; P = 0.07), but there was no evidence of associations with body composition. Male offspring seemed to derive a similar benefit from a maternal low protein intake as did GDM-exposed offspring.Conclusions: Overall, our results provide little support for an association of maternal protein intake in pregnancy with measures of offspring metabolic health. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to determine whether low maternal protein intake in pregnancy may improve glucose homeostasis in GDM-exposed and male offspring.
Background: Recent years have seen strong tendencies toward high-protein diets. However, the implications of higher protein intake, especially during developmentally sensitive periods, are poorly understood. Conversely, evidence on the long-term developmental consequences of low protein intake in free-living populations remains limited.Objective: We examined the association of protein intake in pregnancy with offspring metabolic health at age 9-16 y in a longitudinal cohort that oversampled pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Design: Six hundred eight women with an index pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes mellitus and 626 controls enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort were used for the analysis. Protein (total, animal, vegetable) intake was assessed by using a food-frequency questionnaire in gestational week 25. The offspring underwent a clinical examination including fasting blood samples and a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (subset of 650) from which metabolic outcomes were derived. Multivariable analyses were conducted applying a 1:1 substitution of carbohydrates for protein. Results: The mean ± SD protein intake in pregnancy was 93 ± 15 g/d (16% ± 3% of energy) in GDM-exposed women and 90 ± 14 g/d (16% ± 2% of energy) in control women. There were overall no associations between maternal protein intake and offspring fasting insulin and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). We found that maternal total protein intake was associated with a tendency for a higher abdominal fat mass percentage (quartile 4 compared with quartile 1: 0.40 SD; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.83 SD; P = 0.07) in GDM-exposed offspring and a tendency for a higher total fat mass percentage among male offspring (quartile 4 compared with quartile 1: 0.33 SD; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.66 SD; P = 0.06), but a small sample size may have compromised the precision of the effect estimates. GDM-exposed offspring of mothers with a protein intake in the lowest decile (≤12.5% of energy compared with >12.5% of energy) had lower fasting insulin (ratio of geometric means: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99; P = 0.04) and a tendency toward lower HOMA-IR (ratio of geometric means: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.02; P = 0.07), but there was no evidence of associations with body composition. Male offspring seemed to derive a similar benefit from a maternal low protein intake as did GDM-exposed offspring.Conclusions: Overall, our results provide little support for an association of maternal protein intake in pregnancy with measures of offspring metabolic health. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to determine whether low maternal protein intake in pregnancy may improve glucose homeostasis in GDM-exposed and male offspring.
Authors: Ming Tong; Alexander Neusner; Lisa Longato; Margot Lawton; Jack R Wands; Suzanne M de la Monte Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Walter C Willett; Ken P Kleinman; Emily Oken; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Sanjay Kinra; K V Rameshwar Sarma; Vishnu Vardhana Rao Mendu; Radhakrishnan Ravikumar; Viswanthan Mohan; Ian B Wilkinson; John R Cockcroft; George Davey Smith; Yoav Ben-Shlomo Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-07-25
Authors: Jasmine F Plows; Clare M Reynolds; Mark H Vickers; Philip N Baker; Joanna L Stanley Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Jasmine F Plows; Joanna L Stanley; Philip N Baker; Clare M Reynolds; Mark H Vickers Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ekaterina Maslova; Susanne Hansen; Marin Strøm; Thorhallur I Halldorsson; Louise G Grunnet; Allan A Vaag; Sjurdur F Olsen Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Khalid Khalaf Alharbi; Abdulrahman Mohammed Al-Sulaiman; Khalid Muath Bin Shedaid; Ali M Al-Shangiti; Mohammed Marie; Yazeed A Al-Sheikh; Imran Ali Khan Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 1.526