Literature DB >> 28679539

A glossary of terms for understanding political aspects in the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP).

Goldameir Oneka1, Faraz Vahid Shahidi1, Carles Muntaner2, Ahmed M Bayoumi3,4,5,6, Deb Finn Mahabir2, Alix Freiler3, Patricia O'Campo1,3, Ketan Shankardass3,7,8.   

Abstract

Health in All Policies (HiAP) is a strategy that seeks to integrate health considerations into the development, implementation and evaluation of policies across various non-health sectors of the government. Over the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the uptake of HiAP by local, regional and national governments. Despite the growing popularity of this approach, most existing literature on HiAP implementation remains descriptive rather than explanatory in its orientation. Moreover, prior research has focused on the more technical aspects of the implementation process. Thus, studies that aim to 'build capacity to promote, implement and evaluate HiAP' abound. Conversely, there is little emphasis on the political aspects of HiAP implementation. Neglecting the role of politics in shaping the use of HiAP is problematic, since health and the strategies by which it is promoted are partially political.This glossary addresses the politics gap in the existing literature by drawing on theoretical concepts from political, policy, and public health sciences to articulate a framework for studying how political mechanisms influence HiAP implementation. To this end, the glossary forms part of an on-going multiple explanatory case study of HiAP implementation, HARMONICS (HiAP Analysis using Realist Methods on International Case Studies, harmonics-hiap.ca), and is meant to expand on a previously published glossary addressing the topic of HiAP implementation more broadly. Collectively, these glossaries offer a conceptual toolkit for understanding how politics explains implementation outcomes of HiAP. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; Health inequalities; POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679539     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-208979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating Health in All Policies Comment on "Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia".

Authors:  Sebastián Peña
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  Intersectorality and health: a glossary.

Authors:  Evelyne de Leeuw
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  How and why buy-in for health in all policies was facilitated in Ecuador: a realist case study of Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir.

Authors:  Deb Finn Mahabir; Ketan Shankardass; Alix Freiler; Patricia O'Campo; Ben Brisbois; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-08-15

4.  The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action.

Authors:  Ketan Shankardass; Carles Muntaner; Lauri Kokkinen; Faraz Vahid Shahidi; Alix Freiler; Goldameir Oneka; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-03-15

5.  Ideas for Extending the Approach to Evaluating Health in All Policies in South Australia Comment on "Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia".

Authors:  Ketan Shankardass; Patricia O'Campo; Carles Muntaner; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Lauri Kokkinen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.