Literature DB >> 28679432

New somatic BRAF splicing mutation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Sébastien Héritier1,2,3, Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz4,5, Rikhia Chakraborty6,7, Amel G Sengal6,7, Christine Bellanné-Chantelot8, Caroline Thomas9, Anne Moreau10, Sylvie Fraitag11, Carl E Allen6,7, Jean Donadieu12,4,13, Jean-François Emile4,5.   

Abstract

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia with constitutive activation of the MAPKinase RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK cell signaling pathway. We analyzed 9 LCH cases without BRAF V600 and MAP2K1 mutations by whole exome sequencing. We identified a new somatic BRAF splicing mutation in 2 cases. Both cases were childhood single system (SS) LCH cases, with self-healing outcome of the bone lesions. This mutant consisted in a 9 base pair duplication (c.1511_1517 + 2 duplication), encoding for a predicted mutant protein with insertion of 3 amino acids (p.Arg506_Lys507insLeuLeuArg) in the N-terminal lobe of the kinase domain of BRAF. Transient expression of the c.1511_1517 + 2dup BRAF mutant in HEK293 cells enhanced MAPKinase pathway activation, and was not inhibited by vemurafenib but was inhibited by PLX8394, a second-generation BRAF inhibitor able to inhibit signaling of BRAF monomers and dimers. Future LCH molecular screening panel should include this new mutation to better define its prevalence in LCH and its restriction to autoregressive bone SS LCH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Langerhans cell histiocytosis; Splicing mutation; Targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679432      PMCID: PMC5498996          DOI: 10.1186/s12943-017-0690-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer        ISSN: 1476-4598            Impact factor:   27.401


Background

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is the most common histiocytosis, and is characterized by inflammatory lesions containing abundant CD1a + CD207+ histiocytes that lead to the destruction of affected tissues [1]. A BRAF V600E mutation, responsible for activation of the MAPKinase RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK cell signaling pathway in pathologic histiocytes, is present in ~55% of LCH cases and was associated with recurrence and high-risk presentation [2]. Responses to BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated LCH confirms that BRAF V600E is a driver mutation in LCH [3]. Although ~45% do not have BRAF V600E mutation, ERK was reported to be activated in pathologic histiocytes of all LCH samples [4]. Other molecular alterations have also been reported to activate the MAPKinase pathway in BRAF V600E-non mutated LCH, such as MAP2K1 mutations (10-20% of LCH) [5, 6], β3-αC loop deletion in the kinase domain of BRAF (6% of LCH) [7], and case reports highlighted mutation on ARAF [8] and MAP3K1 [9]. Fusion events involving BRAF and activating MAPkinase pathway have also been reported in histiocytoses of the L group [7, 10]. To identify the mechanism of pathologic ERK activation in the remaining LCH, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on selected LCH frozen biopsy samples wild-type for the most common activating mutations reported in LCH. DNA extracted from peripheral white blood cells (PBMC) were used as the “normal” sample for comparison. Mutation function and response to MAPKinase pathway inhibitors were assessed using in vitro constructs.

Results

From the French LCH registry [11], 9 patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: i) fresh frozen biopsy tissue and blood samples available, ii) high percentage of lesions-infiltrating CD207+ histiocytes (>30%), iii) no mutation identified by BRAF V600E pyrosequencing [2] or among the most common activating mutations of PIK3CA, BRAF, KRAS and NRAS with the i-plex mass spectrometric based genotyping technology (Sequenom-Agena Bioscience) [12], iv) negative screening for exon 2-3 MAP2K1 mutations by Sanger sequencing. Among the 9 included patients, 7 had a bone-limited LCH and 2 had a LCH involving several organs (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical data and sequencing results for LCH cases without BRAF V600E or MAP2K1 mutations

PatientGenderAge at diagnosis (years)Extension (DAS max)Involved organsFirst-line therapyResponse to first-line therapyRecur-renceMAPKinases mutationa
P1F1.0MS RO+ (5)Multifocal bone, lymph nodes, hematologic, liver, spleenVLB-steroidADBNoWT
P2M17.5SS (1)Localized boneWait and see_NoWT
P3F0.8MS RO+ (8)Multifocal bone, skin, lymph nodes, hematologic, spleenVLB-steroidADBYesWT
P4M0.5SS (1)Localized boneVLB-steroidNADNoWT
P5F4.9SS (1)Localized boneWait and see_NoBRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup
P6F10.2SS (0)Multifocal boneWait and see_YesBRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup
P7F8.7SS (0)Localized boneWait and see_NoWT
P8F1.1SS (1)Multifocal boneVLB-steroidNADNoWT
P9M2.8SS (4)Localized boneVLB-steroidNADNoWT

ADB active disease better, DAS max maximum Disease Activity Score (DAS) measured during the clinical course for each patient, F female, M male, MS RO+ multiple systems LCH with risk organs involvement, NAD non-active disease, SS single system LCH, VLB vinblastine

aDeleterious coding missense or non-sense or small indel mutations in genes involved in the MAPkinase cell signaling pathway

Clinical data and sequencing results for LCH cases without BRAF V600E or MAP2K1 mutations ADB active disease better, DAS max maximum Disease Activity Score (DAS) measured during the clinical course for each patient, F female, M male, MS RO+ multiple systems LCH with risk organs involvement, NAD non-active disease, SS single system LCH, VLB vinblastine aDeleterious coding missense or non-sense or small indel mutations in genes involved in the MAPkinase cell signaling pathway

Detection of duplication at the end of BRAF exon 12 in LCH samples

A somatic duplication of 9 base pairs at the end of exon 12 of BRAF (nucleotides c.1511_1517 + 2) was detected in LCH samples from 2 patients (P5 and P6). Both patients were children with self-healing bone lesions. This duplication was not yet reported in the COSMIC database. For both patients, Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA confirmed the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2 duplication in LCH lesions (Fig. 1a), but failed to detect it within PBMC. This 9 nucleotides insertion at the position +2 of the splice donor site of intron 12 was predicted to change the splicing, with an insertion of 9 nucleotides in the cDNA sequence [GTTACTCAG] at the end of exon 12 (Fig. 1b). Messenger RNA was extracted from lesion of P5, and length analysis of PCR products of cDNA confirmed a 9 nucleotides insertion (Fig. 1c). Insertion was also confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Additional file 1: Figure. S1).
Fig. 1

Analysis of LCH samples. a Sanger sequencing of P5 and P6 LCH samples shows duplication of the c.1511_1517 + 2 sequence. b In silico analysis (Alamut® Visual, hg19) predicts a 5′ splice site change, causing the insertion of 9 nucleotides in the cDNA sequence [GTTACTCAG] at the end of exon 12. (C) P5 cDNA analyse confirms insertion of 9 nucleotides by rt.-PCR product length analysis. d Immunohistochemistry performed on FFPE samples from P5 showed a strong cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity of histiocytes with phosphoERK1/2 (D13.14.4E, Rabbit mAb, Cell Signaling) in areas containing numerous CD1a + LCH cells. e Results of the western blot (p- and total-ERK1/2) for P5 and P6 LCH. Protein extracts from two BRAF wild type, a BRAF V600E-mutated LCH and a BRAF V600D-mutated LCH were used as positive control for p-ERK. Functional analysis of the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2 duplication. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids encoding BRAF wild-type, BRAF V600E and BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutant cDNAs, and corresponding lysates from cells maintained in serum were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. f Where indicated, cells were treated with inhibitor of BRAFV600E (vemurafenib) or MEK (trametinib) for 4 h before harvest. g Where indicated, cells were treated with combination of vemurafenib and trametinib, or with inhibitors of BRAF (PLX8394) or ERK (TCS ERK 11e) for 4 h before harvest. h To test dose response to vemurafenib and trametinib on BRAF V600E and BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup transfected cells, the cells were treated for 4 h with the specified agents (vemurafenib or trametinib) at the specified doses before harvest

Analysis of LCH samples. a Sanger sequencing of P5 and P6 LCH samples shows duplication of the c.1511_1517 + 2 sequence. b In silico analysis (Alamut® Visual, hg19) predicts a 5′ splice site change, causing the insertion of 9 nucleotides in the cDNA sequence [GTTACTCAG] at the end of exon 12. (C) P5 cDNA analyse confirms insertion of 9 nucleotides by rt.-PCR product length analysis. d Immunohistochemistry performed on FFPE samples from P5 showed a strong cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity of histiocytes with phosphoERK1/2 (D13.14.4E, Rabbit mAb, Cell Signaling) in areas containing numerous CD1a + LCH cells. e Results of the western blot (p- and total-ERK1/2) for P5 and P6 LCH. Protein extracts from two BRAF wild type, a BRAF V600E-mutated LCH and a BRAF V600D-mutated LCH were used as positive control for p-ERK. Functional analysis of the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2 duplication. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids encoding BRAF wild-type, BRAF V600E and BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutant cDNAs, and corresponding lysates from cells maintained in serum were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. f Where indicated, cells were treated with inhibitor of BRAFV600E (vemurafenib) or MEK (trametinib) for 4 h before harvest. g Where indicated, cells were treated with combination of vemurafenib and trametinib, or with inhibitors of BRAF (PLX8394) or ERK (TCS ERK 11e) for 4 h before harvest. h To test dose response to vemurafenib and trametinib on BRAF V600E and BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup transfected cells, the cells were treated for 4 h with the specified agents (vemurafenib or trametinib) at the specified doses before harvest To investigate the prevalence of the somatic BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2 duplication in LCH, we studied 28 additional LCH samples wild-type for BRAF V600, by length analysis of PCR products. No additional mutated case was found, suggesting that this mutation represents a small proportion of BRAF V600 wild-type LCH (<10%) [7], but more studies are needed to estimate precisely its prevalence.

Functional analysis and response to MAPkinase inhibitors

The insertion of 3 amino acid (p.Arg506_Lys507insLeuLeuArg) coded by this 9 base pair duplication is localized in the smaller N-terminal lobe of the kinase BRAF domain responsible for ATP binding (Additional file 1: Figure. S2). Small deletions localized nearby this region of BRAF were shown to induce MAPkinase pathway activation in LCH and in pancreatic carcinomas [7, 13], suggesting that this new mutation may also have functional impact. Immunohistochemistry of samples of P5 and P6 confirmed that areas rich in CD1a + histiocytes contained numerous histiocytes with phosphoERK in their cytoplasms as well as translocated into the nucleus (Fig. 1d). The strong phosphorylation of ERK in LCH lesions of P5 and P6 was also confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 1e). We then assessed the functional impact of this genomic alteration on BRAF signaling by analyzing phosphorylation of ERK in HEK293 cells transiently transfected with wild-type BRAF, BRAF or BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutants. cDNA expression of BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup, but not wild-type BRAF, resulted in a significant increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 1f). We also evaluated the ability of the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib to suppress ERK activation by specific BRAF alterations. Although vemurafenib induced a substantial inhibition of BRAF -induced activation, this drug did not inhibit the MAPkinase activation in cells transfected with the cDNA containing the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutant, which is consistent with specific activity of this agent against mutations that result in active BRAF monomers. Trametinib, which blocks active MEK, decreased activation of ERK in cells transfected with BRAF V600E, but with no impact on cells transfected with the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutant (Fig. 1f). We thus further evaluated the effects of other, or combination of inhibitors of the MAPkinase pathway. As expected TCS ERK 11e, which directly inhibits ERK, induced a total extinction of ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 1g). PLX8394 is a second-generation BRAF inhibitor able to inhibit signaling of BRAF monomers and dimers without paradoxical activation of MAPKpathway signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF that has been observed in first-generation agents such as vemurafenib [14, 15]. PLX8394 induced an almost complete extinction of pERK signal on Western blot, confirming that most of the pathway activation was due to the mutant BRAF. Again vemurafenib or trametinib alone did not suppress ERK activation, but combination of both drugs induced a completed extinction of the pERK signal (Fig. 1g). To elucidate this last observation, we performed a dose response experiment with vemurafenib and trametinib on BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup transfected cells and BRAF V600E transfected cells, in order to test if an increased dose for trametinib was required to block activation by the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutation as compared to other LCH-associated BRAF mutations. In our model, while vemurafenib and trametinib induced an inhibition of BRAF -induced activation with relationship between dose and response, these drugs did not inhibit the MAPkinase activation in BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup transfected cells regardless of dose (Fig. 1h). Neither vemurafenib nor trametinib used individually, even at the highest concentration, could inhibit phosphorylated MEK1/2 and phosphorylated ERK1/2. Future study should better define mechanisms of resistance of the BRAF c.1511_1517 + 2dup mutation by targeted therapies such as vemurafenib and trametinib.

Conclusions

We report here a new somatic BRAF splicing mutation in LCH, leading to the insertion of 3 amino acids (p.Arg506_Lys507insLeuLeuArg) in the N-terminal lobe of the kinase domain of BRAF. This mutation constitutively activates the MAPKinase pathway, and was inhibited by the second-generation BRAF inhibitor PLX8394. Thanks to recent substantial effort of LCH expert teams, the unknown part of the molecular spectrum of LCH continues to shrink and identification of these mutations has many potential applications such as targeted therapy, therapeutic risk-stratification based on tumor genotype, and quantitative detection of mutant allele in circulating cell free DNA as possible blood biomarkers.
  15 in total

1.  Common cancer-associated PIK3CA activating mutations rarely occur in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Sébastien Héritier; Raphael Saffroy; Nina Radosevic-Robin; Yolaine Pothin; Héléne Pacquement; Michel Peuchmaur; Antoinette Lemoine; Julien Haroche; Jean Donadieu; Jean-Francois Emile
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  High prevalence of somatic MAP2K1 mutations in BRAF V600E-negative Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Noah A Brown; Larissa V Furtado; Bryan L Betz; Mark J Kiel; Helmut C Weigelin; Megan S Lim; Kojo S J Elenitoba-Johnson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Activation Mechanism of Oncogenic Deletion Mutations in BRAF, EGFR, and HER2.

Authors:  Scott A Foster; Daniel M Whalen; Ayşegül Özen; Matthew J Wongchenko; JianPing Yin; Ivana Yen; Gabriele Schaefer; John D Mayfield; Juliann Chmielecki; Philip J Stephens; Lee A Albacker; Yibing Yan; Kyung Song; Georgia Hatzivassiliou; Charles Eigenbrot; Christine Yu; Andrey S Shaw; Gerard Manning; Nicholas J Skelton; Sarah G Hymowitz; Shiva Malek
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 4.  Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages.

Authors:  Jean-François Emile; Oussama Abla; Sylvie Fraitag; Annacarin Horne; Julien Haroche; Jean Donadieu; Luis Requena-Caballero; Michael B Jordan; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Carl E Allen; Frédéric Charlotte; Eli L Diamond; R Maarten Egeler; Alain Fischer; Juana Gil Herrera; Jan-Inge Henter; Filip Janku; Miriam Merad; Jennifer Picarsic; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Barret J Rollins; Abdellatif Tazi; Robert Vassallo; Lawrence M Weiss
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  MAP2K1 and MAP3K1 mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  David S Nelson; Astrid van Halteren; Willemijn T Quispel; Cor van den Bos; Judith V M G Bovée; Bhumi Patel; Gayane Badalian-Very; Paul van Hummelen; Matthew Ducar; Ling Lin; Laura E MacConaill; R Maarten Egeler; Barrett J Rollins
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Recurrent BRAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  Gayane Badalian-Very; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Barbara A Degar; Laura E MacConaill; Barbara Brandner; Monica L Calicchio; Frank C Kuo; Azra H Ligon; Kristen E Stevenson; Sarah M Kehoe; Levi A Garraway; William C Hahn; Matthew Meyerson; Mark D Fleming; Barrett J Rollins
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  An Integrated Model of RAF Inhibitor Action Predicts Inhibitor Activity against Oncogenic BRAF Signaling.

Authors:  Zoi Karoulia; Yang Wu; Tamer A Ahmed; Qisheng Xin; Julien Bollard; Clemens Krepler; Xuewei Wu; Chao Zhang; Gideon Bollag; Meenhard Herlyn; James A Fagin; Amaia Lujambio; Evripidis Gavathiotis; Poulikos I Poulikakos
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Somatic activating ARAF mutations in Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Authors:  David S Nelson; Willemijn Quispel; Gayane Badalian-Very; Astrid G S van Halteren; Cor van den Bos; Judith V M G Bovée; Sara Y Tian; Paul Van Hummelen; Matthew Ducar; Laura E MacConaill; R Maarten Egeler; Barrett J Rollins
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Diverse and Targetable Kinase Alterations Drive Histiocytic Neoplasms.

Authors:  Eli L Diamond; Benjamin H Durham; Julien Haroche; Zhan Yao; Jing Ma; Sameer A Parikh; Zhaoming Wang; John Choi; Eunhee Kim; Fleur Cohen-Aubart; Stanley Chun-Wei Lee; Yijun Gao; Jean-Baptiste Micol; Patrick Campbell; Michael P Walsh; Brooke Sylvester; Igor Dolgalev; Olga Aminova; Adriana Heguy; Paul Zappile; Joy Nakitandwe; Chezi Ganzel; James D Dalton; David W Ellison; Juvianee Estrada-Veras; Mario Lacouture; William A Gahl; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Siraj M Ali; Samuel R Briggs; Omotayo Fasan; Jared Block; Sebastien Héritier; Jean Donadieu; David B Solit; David M Hyman; José Baselga; Filip Janku; Barry S Taylor; Christopher Y Park; Zahir Amoura; Ahmet Dogan; Jean-Francois Emile; Neal Rosen; Tanja A Gruber; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Mutually exclusive recurrent somatic mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF support a central role for ERK activation in LCH pathogenesis.

Authors:  Rikhia Chakraborty; Oliver A Hampton; Xiaoyun Shen; Stephen J Simko; Albert Shih; Harshal Abhyankar; Karen Phaik Har Lim; Kyle R Covington; Lisa Trevino; Ninad Dewal; Donna M Muzny; Harshavardhan Doddapaneni; Jianhong Hu; Linghua Wang; Philip J Lupo; M John Hicks; Diana L Bonilla; Karen C Dwyer; Marie-Luise Berres; Poulikos I Poulikakos; Miriam Merad; Kenneth L McClain; David A Wheeler; Carl E Allen; D Williams Parsons
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Langerhans-Cell Histiocytosis.

Authors:  Carl E Allen; Miriam Merad; Kenneth L McClain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Systemic Histiocytosis (Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, Erdheim-Chester Disease, Destombes-Rosai-Dorfman Disease): from Oncogenic Mutations to Inflammatory Disorders.

Authors:  Matthias Papo; Fleur Cohen-Aubart; Ludovic Trefond; Adeline Bauvois; Zahir Amoura; Jean-François Emile; Julien Haroche
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  The medical necessity of advanced molecular testing in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Craig Horbinski; Keith L Ligon; Priscilla Brastianos; Jason T Huse; Monica Venere; Susan Chang; Jan Buckner; Timothy Cloughesy; Robert B Jenkins; Caterina Giannini; Roger Stupp; L Burt Nabors; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth J Aldape; Rimas V Lukas; Evanthia Galanis; Charles G Eberhart; Daniel J Brat; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Drug resistance in targeted cancer therapies with RAF inhibitors.

Authors:  Ufuk Degirmenci; Jiajun Yap; Yuen Rong M Sim; Shiru Qin; Jiancheng Hu
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2021-06-17

Review 5.  MAP-Kinase-Driven Hematopoietic Neoplasms: A Decade of Progress in the Molecular Age.

Authors:  Rikhia Chakraborty; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Benjamin H Durham
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  The stability of R-spine defines RAF inhibitor resistance: A comprehensive analysis of oncogenic BRAF mutants with in-frame insertion of αC-β4 loop.

Authors:  Jiajun Yap; R N V Krishna Deepak; Zizi Tian; Wan Hwa Ng; Kah Chun Goh; Alicia Foo; Zi Heng Tee; Manju Payini Mohanam; Yuen Rong M Sim; Ufuk Degirmenci; Paula Lam; Zhongzhou Chen; Hao Fan; Jiancheng Hu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Histiocytosis.

Authors:  Jean-François Emile; Fleur Cohen-Aubart; Matthew Collin; Sylvie Fraitag; Ahmed Idbaih; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Barrett J Rollins; Jean Donadieu; Julien Haroche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 202.731

8.  KRAS mutation in secondary malignant histiocytosis arising from low grade follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Sarah M Choi; Aleodor A Andea; Min Wang; Amir Behdad; Lina Shao; Yanming Zhang; Xinyan Lu; David Dittmann; Juan Castro; Yi-Hua Chen; Juehua Gao
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 9.  Hepatic Langerhans cell histiocytosis: A review.

Authors:  Zhiyan Fu; Hua Li; Mustafa Erdem Arslan; Peter F Ells; Hwajeong Lee
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 10.  Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults: Advances in pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Masayuki Kobayashi; Arinobu Tojo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.