| Literature DB >> 28679388 |
Michele Menotta1, Sara Biagiotti2, Chiara Spapperi2, Sara Orazi2, Luigia Rossi2, Luciana Chessa3, Vincenzo Leuzzi4, Daniela D'Agnano4, Annarosa Soresina5, Roberto Micheli5, Mauro Magnani2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ataxia Telangiectasia (AT) is a rare incurable genetic disease, caused by biallelic mutations in the Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated (ATM) gene. Treatment with glucocorticoid analogues has been shown to improve the neurological symptoms that characterize this syndrome. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism underlying the glucocorticoid action in AT patients is not yet understood. Recently, we have demonstrated that Dexamethasone treatment may partly restore ATM activity in AT lymphoblastoid cells by a new ATM transcript, namely ATMdexa1.Entities:
Keywords: ATM; ATMdexa1; Ataxia Telangiectasia; Dexamethasone; Intra-erythrocyte DEXA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28679388 PMCID: PMC5498894 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0669-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1ATMdexa1 expression levels in patients treated with EryDex. Two qPCR assays were set up for ATMdexa1 estimation in whole blood. AT, untreated patients with AT n = 6; AT Dexa, patients with AT and treated with EryDex n = 10; WT, healthy volunteers n = 6. The first qPCR assay is based on SYBR green chemistry PCR (panel a) while a second one is built on 5′ exonuclease qPCR (panel b). In both settings, ATMdexa1 expression levels were detectable only in AT patients treated with EryDex. The transcript was undetectable in untreated AT patients and in healthy volunteers
Fig. 2ATMdexa1 expression in responders and non-responders. In panel a, AT patients treated with EryDex were divided into two clusters (responders R n = 5 and non-responders NR n = 5, by average ICARS value decrement of at least 10 points, after six months of therapy). Responders showed higher levels of ATMdexa1 expression (p < 0.05) than did non-responders. In panel b, for one patient from each cluster, it was possible to evaluate the expression of ATMdexa1 also at +8 days from EryDex administration. In both cases, the extent of the target expression was time dependent
Fig. 3FKBP5 and DUSP1 mRNA expression. Gene expression levels of the two evaluated prototypic targets. AT, untreated patients with AT n = 6; AT Dexa, patients with AT and treated with EryDex n = 10; WT, healthy volunteers n = 6. As predicted, in treated AT patients an improvement in gene expression was observed
Fig. 4ATMdexa1 transcript family. Amplicons obtained by 5′ nuclease qPCR of the compassionate EryDex samples analysed by electrophoretic gel. Lane M, DNA ladder. Lanes 1–16 contain the qPCR products from five patient samples collected at different time points. The white arrows show the ATMdexa1 PCR product, while the amplicon in all lanes at 115 bp is the HPRT1 PCR product. The other PCR products, with the exception of non-specific amplicons, represent ATMdexa1 splicing variants: green arrow splicing SDR 4–51; yellow arrows splicing 4–53; red arrows splicing 3–52; cyan arrow splicing SDR 3–52 and magenta arrow splicing 2–52
Fig. 5Schematic of the ATMdaxa1 transcripts family. Five ATMdexa1 variants were characterised. Three components of the family derived from canonical splicing while two were from an SDR mediated splicing